IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijlaec/v67y2024i1d10.1007_s41027-024-00478-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Degree of Monopoly and Distribution of Income in India’s Organised Manufacturing Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Paramjit Singh

    (Panjab University
    York University)

  • Kriti Sharma

    (University of Toronto)

Abstract

The present study is an attempt to examine the development of monopoly capitalism in India through industry-level analysis of the change in the degree of monopoly and distribution of income. To this end, the Kaleckian approach has been applied to all the 56 three-digit Indian organised manufacturing industries listed in the Annual Survey of Industries covering the period 1998–2018. The data have been examined at four levels: the aggregate sectoral level, the aggregate of the top 25 per cent industries, the aggregate of the top 10 per cent and disaggregate analysis of the top 6 industries. The study finds strong evidence of the growth of monopoly power in the manufacturing sector with the rising growth rate of the economy, indicating the rise of monopoly capitalism in India. It also brings out the dominance of the top 25 and top 10 per cent (in terms of gross value added [GVA] share and employment) manufacturing industries) in the determination of aggregate monopoly power and the wage share in the organised manufacturing sector. The study finds that under monopoly capitalism, the rise of profits of the larger industries in India’s organised manufacturing sector primarily comes from the deduction of wages of production workers and the flow of surplus from smaller to larger industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Paramjit Singh & Kriti Sharma, 2024. "Degree of Monopoly and Distribution of Income in India’s Organised Manufacturing Sector," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 67(1), pages 129-155, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijlaec:v:67:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s41027-024-00478-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s41027-024-00478-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41027-024-00478-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41027-024-00478-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Kaldor, 1955. "Alternative Theories of Distribution," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 23(2), pages 83-100.
    2. Paul M. Sweezy, 1939. "Demand Under Conditions of Oligopoly," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(4), pages 568-568.
    3. Pant, Manoj & Pattanayak, Manoranjan, 2005. "Does Openness Promote Competition? A Case Study of Indian Manufacturing," MPRA Paper 2871, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Roberto Veneziani & Luca Zamparelli & Amitava Krishna Dutt, 2017. "Heterodox Theories Of Economic Growth And Income Distribution: A Partial Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1240-1271, December.
    5. Jan De Loecker & Jan Eeckhout & Gabriel Unger, 2020. "The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications [“Econometric Tools for Analyzing Market Outcomes”]," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(2), pages 561-644.
    6. Nair, Anoopa S, 2012. "Monopoly Power and Firm Dominance in Indian Manufacturing Sector: An Empirical Analysis," Indian Economic Review, Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics, vol. 47(1), pages 109-141.
    7. Myron J. Gordon, 1998. "Monopoly Power in the United States Manufacturing Sector, 1899 to 1994," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 323-335, March.
    8. J. Branston & Keith Cowling & Philip Tomlinson, 2014. "Profiteering and the degree of monopoly in the Great Recession: recent evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 135-162.
    9. Sawyer, Malcolm C, 1988. "Theories of Monopoly Capitalism," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 47-76.
    10. Suma Athreye & Sandeep Kapur, 2006. "Industrial concentration in a liberalising economy: A study of Indian manufacturing," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 981-999.
    11. Ghosh, Arabinda, 1975. "Concentration and Growth of Indian Industries, 1948-68," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 203-222, March.
    12. A. P. Lerner, 1934. "The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 157-175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jatinder Singh, 2011. "Inward Investment and Market Structure in an Open Developing Economy: A Case of India’s Manufacturing Sector," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 2(6), pages 286-297.
    2. Matteo G. Richiardi & Luis Valenzuela, 2024. "Firm heterogeneity and the aggregate labour share," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 38(1), pages 66-101, March.
    3. Kadner-Graziano, Alessandro S., 2023. "Mergers of Complements: On the Absence of Consumer Benefits," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. A. Douglas Melamed & Nicolas Petit, 2019. "The Misguided Assault on the Consumer Welfare Standard in the Age of Platform Markets," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 54(4), pages 741-774, June.
    5. Kaku Attah Damoah & Giorgia Giovannetti & Marco Sanfilippo, 2021. "Markup Dispersion and Firm Entry: Evidence from Ethiopia," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 83(2), pages 299-327, April.
    6. Thiago Christiano Silva & Sergio Rubens Stancato de Souza & Solange Maria Guerra, 2022. "Covid-19 and market power in local credit markets: the role of digitalization," BIS Working Papers 1017, Bank for International Settlements.
    7. Matthew Rognlie & Adrien Auclert, 2016. "Inequality and Aggregate Demand," 2016 Meeting Papers 1353, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    8. Mydland, Ørjan & Størdal, Ståle & Kumbhakar, Subal C. & Lien, Gudbrand, 2022. "Modeling markups and its determinants: The case of Norwegian industries and regions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 252-262.
    9. Silva, Thiago & Souza, Sérgio & Guerra, Solange & Tabak, Benjamin, 2022. "Decentralized Market Power in Credit Markets," MPRA Paper 114766, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Adrián Rodríguez Valle & Esteban Fernández-Vázquez, 2023. "Estimating market power for the European manufacturing industry between 2000 and 2014," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 141-172, February.
    11. Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira, 1999. "La relations salaire-emploi sous l'éclairage de la concurrence imparfaite," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(1), pages 15-40.
    12. Mertens, Matthias, 2022. "Micro-mechanisms behind declining labor shares: Rising market power and changing modes of production," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Budzinski, Oliver & Stöhr, Annika, 2024. "Perfect competition, market power, and contestability," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 189, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    14. Axelle Arquié & Malte Thie, 2023. "Energy, Inflation and Market Power: Excess Pass-Through in France," Working Papers 2023-16, CEPII research center.
    15. Rahaman, Mohammad M. & Zhang, Michael & Feng, Jiejian, 2022. "Two-sided market power and firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 585-605.
    16. Nishi, Hiroshi, 2022. "Income distribution, technical change, and economic growth: A two-sector Kalecki–Kaldor approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 418-432.
    17. Gu, Jing & Shi, Xinyu & Wang, Junyao & Xu, Xun, 2024. "Examining the impact of market power discrepancy between supply chain partners on firm financial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    18. Ashish Kumar Sedai, 2019. "Wages in Imperfect Markets: A Post-reforms Study of Indian Manufacturing," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 14(3), pages 257-280, December.
    19. Rolf Färe & Giannis Karagiannis, 2024. "The denominator rule with unit ratio difference," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 183-190, April.
    20. Yue Li & Kuo,Ryan Chia & Pinzon Latorre,Mauricio Alejandro & Albertson,Mark Peter, 2022. "FDI, Market Power, and Markups : Evidence from Vietnam," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9998, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Degree of monopoly; Kalecki; Labour share; Capitalist share; India; Monopoly Capitalism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D3 - Microeconomics - - Distribution
    • E11 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Marxian; Sraffian; Kaleckian
    • L12 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
    • L6 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijlaec:v:67:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s41027-024-00478-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.