IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v14y2024i1d10.1186_s13561-024-00535-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socio-economic inequalities in the use of flu vaccination in Europe: a multilevel approach

Author

Listed:
  • Dănuț-Vasile Jemna

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi)

  • Mihaela David

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi)

  • Liliane Bonnal

    (University of Poitiers)

  • Cornel Oros

    (University of Poitiers)

Abstract

Background The European-wide statistics show that the use of flu vaccination remains low and the differences between countries are significant, as are those between different population groups within each country. Considerable research has focused on explaining vaccination uptake in relation to socio-economic and demographic characteristics, health promotion and health behavior factors. Nevertheless, few studies have aimed to analyze between-country differences in the use of flu vaccination for the EU population. To address this gap, this study examines the socio-economic inequalities in the use of influenza vaccination for the population aged 15 years and over in all 27 EU Member States and two other non-EU countries (Iceland and Norway). Methods Using data from the third wave of European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) 2019, we employed a multilevel logistic model with a random intercept for country, which allows controlling simultaneously the variations in individuals’ characteristics and macro-contextual factors which could influence the use of flu vaccination. In addition, the analysis considers the population stratified into four age groups, namely adolescents, young adults, adults and elderly, to better capture heterogeneities in flu vaccination uptake. Results The main findings confirm the existence of socio-economic inequalities between individuals in different age groups, but also of significant variation between European countries, particularly for older people, in the use of influenza vaccination. In this respect, income and education are strong proxy of socio-economic status associated with flu vaccination uptake. Moreover, these disparities within each population group are also explained by area of residence and occupational status. Particularly for the elderly, the differences between individuals in vaccine utilization are also explained by country-level factors, such as the type of healthcare system adopted in each country, public funding, personal health expenditure burden, or the availability of generalist practitioners. Conclusions Overall, our findings reveal that vaccination against seasonal influenza remains a critical public health intervention and bring attention to the relevance of conceiving and implementing context-specific strategies to ensure equitable access to vaccines for all EU citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • Dănuț-Vasile Jemna & Mihaela David & Liliane Bonnal & Cornel Oros, 2024. "Socio-economic inequalities in the use of flu vaccination in Europe: a multilevel approach," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-024-00535-1
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00535-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-024-00535-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-024-00535-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Miller & Yuriy Pylypchuk, 2014. "Marital Status, Spousal Characteristics, and the Use of Preventive Care," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 323-338, September.
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:5511 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Ming-Jye Wang & Yi-Ting Lo, 2022. "Strategies for Improving the Utilization of Preventive Care Services: Application of Importance–Performance Gap Analysis Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Jørgen Lauridsen & Jalandhar Pradhan, 2011. "Socio-economic inequality of immunization coverage in India," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-6, December.
    5. Chad D. Meyerhoefer & Samuel H. Zuvekas & Bita Fayaz Farkhad & John F. Moeller & Richard J. Manski, 2019. "The demand for preventive and restorative dental services among older adults," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(9), pages 1151-1158, September.
    6. Terraneo, Marco, 2015. "Inequities in health care utilization by people aged 50+: Evidence from 12 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 154-163.
    7. repec:mpr:mprres:5512 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hal:journl:hal-04773956 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. dos Santos, Anderson Moreira Aristides & Triaca, Lívia Madeira & Tejada, Cesar Augusto Oviedo, 2021. "Evolution of inequalities in health care use among older people in Brazil: Evidence for the period 1998–2019," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    3. Chen, Yuanyuan & Wang, Haining & Cheng, Zhiming & Smyth, Russell, 2023. "Education and Migrant Health in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. Alisson Fernandes Bolina & Nayara Cândida Gomes & Gianna Fiori Marchiori & Maycon Sousa Pegorari & Darlene Mara dos Santos Tavares, 2019. "Potentially inappropriate medication use and frailty phenotype among community‐dwelling older adults: A population‐based study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3914-3922, November.
    5. Wolfgang Frimmel & Felix Glaser, 2024. "Socio-Economic Inequality in Mortality and Healthcare Utilization: Evidence from Cancer Patients," Economics working papers 2024-14, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    6. Evan Borkum & Dana Rotz & Anu Rangarajan & Swetha Sridharan & Sukhmani Sethi & Mercy Manoranjini & Lakshmi Ramakrishnan & Lalit Dandona & Rakhi Dandona & Priyanka S. Kochar & G. Anil Kumar & Priyanka , "undated". "Midline Findings from the Evaluation of the Ananya Program in Bihar," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 74ef56ababd9412b82ef906fc, Mathematica Policy Research.
    7. David Cantarero-Prieto & Marta Pascual-Sáez & Carla Blázquez-Fernández, 2021. "Does Social Isolation Affect Medical Doctor Visits? New Evidence Among European Older Adults," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(2), pages 787-804, April.
    8. Davillas, Apostolos & Pudney, Stephen, 2020. "Biomarkers, disability and health care demand," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    9. Sabah T Alharbi & Muneeb M Alzghool, 2019. "Factors Associated With Access, Utilization, and Level of Satisfaction With Primary Health Care Services in Hafar Al-batain City of Saudi Arabia," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(13), pages 1-34, December.
    10. Olufunke A. Alaba & Charles Hongoro & Aquina Thulare & Akim Tafadzwa Lukwa, 2021. "Leaving No Child Behind: Decomposing Socioeconomic Inequalities in Child Health for India and South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Aimée Hartford Kvæl, Linda & Gautun, Heidi, 2023. "Social inequality in navigating the healthcare maze: Care trajectories from hospital to home via intermediate care for older people in Norway," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    12. Singh, Prashant Kumar & Parasuraman, Sulabha, 2014. "‘Looking beyond the male–female dichotomy’ – Sibling composition and child immunization in India, 1992–2006," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 145-153.
    13. Joy Agner & Katharine Elizabeth Bau & Dirk Bruland, 2024. "An Introduction to Health Literacy and Social Contexts with Recommendations for Health Professionals and Researchers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Tiken Das, 2024. "Unveiling Spatial Heterogeneity: A Study of Diverse Child Immunization Indicators Across Indian Districts," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(4), pages 1615-1659, August.
    15. David Cantarero-Prieto & Marta Pascual-Sáez & Carla Blázquez-Fernández, 2018. "Does social isolation affect medical doctor visits? New evidence among European older adults," Working Papers. Collection B: Regional and sectoral economics 1805, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
    16. Thomas Leoni & Martin Spielauer & Peter Reschenhofer, 2020. "Soziale Unterschiede, Lebenserwartung und Gesundheitsausgaben im Lebensverlauf," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66626, January.
    17. Alan Monheit & Jessica Vistnes, 2015. "Does Public Health Insurance for Children Improve Single Mothers’ Health Care Use?," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 581-592, December.
    18. Pulok, Mohammad Habibullah & Hajizadeh, Mohammad, 2022. "Equity in the use of physician services in Canada's universal health system: A longitudinal analysis of older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    19. Jens Hoebel & Alexander Rommel & Sara Lena Schröder & Judith Fuchs & Enno Nowossadeck & Thomas Lampert, 2017. "Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health and Perceived Unmet Needs for Healthcare among the Elderly in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Alinda George & Pritee Sharma, 2023. "Spatial disparities in health status and access to health-related interventions in Madhya Pradesh," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 865-902, September.
    21. Vincens, Natalia & Emmelin, Maria & Stafström, Martin, 2018. "Social capital, income inequality and the social gradient in self-rated health in Latin America: A fixed effects analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 115-122.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-024-00535-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.