IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v26y2017i5d10.1007_s10726-016-9516-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward the Automated Detection of Individuals’ Rationales in Large-Scale Online Open Participative Activities: A Conceptual Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Xiao

    (Syracuse University)

  • Jennifer Stromer-Galley

    (Syracuse University)

  • Ágnes Sándor

    (Xerox Research Centre Europe)

Abstract

In large-scale online open participative (LSOOP) activities, participants can join and leave at any time, and they often do not have a history of working together. Although the communication history is usually accessible to the participants in the environment, it is time consuming for them to process the communication data because of the large volume of messages. These characteristics make it difficult for one to keep track of, identify, and interpret the others’ ideas, opinions, and their rationales in LSOOP activities. We argue for a computational approach that automatically identifies and extracts the rationales from LSOOP communication data and presents them to the participants through rationale-based awareness tools. In this paper we bring together different and hitherto independent lines of research, and propose to use them in a conceptual framework integrating three analytical aspects related to the detection of rationales: linguistic, informational, and argumentative and communicative. We also review the design effort on offering rationale-based awareness in the LSOOP activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Xiao & Jennifer Stromer-Galley & Ágnes Sándor, 2017. "Toward the Automated Detection of Individuals’ Rationales in Large-Scale Online Open Participative Activities: A Conceptual Framework," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 891-910, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:26:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-016-9516-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-016-9516-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-016-9516-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-016-9516-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu Xiao, 2014. "Effects of rationale awareness in online ideation crowdsourcing tasks," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(8), pages 1707-1720, August.
    2. Lu Xiao & Nicole Askin, 2014. "What influences online deliberation? A wikipedia study," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(5), pages 898-910, May.
    3. Andreas Peldszus & Manfred Stede, 2013. "From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey," International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), IGI Global, vol. 7(1), pages 1-31, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu Xiao & Nadia K. Conroy, 2017. "Discourse relations in rationale‐containing text‐segments," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2783-2794, December.
    2. Emmanuel W. Ayaburi & Jaeung Lee & Michele Maasberg, 0. "Understanding Crowdsourcing Contest Fitness Strategic Decision Factors and Performance: An Expectation-Confirmation Theory Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    3. Emmanuel W. Ayaburi & Jaeung Lee & Michele Maasberg, 2020. "Understanding Crowdsourcing Contest Fitness Strategic Decision Factors and Performance: An Expectation-Confirmation Theory Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1227-1240, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:26:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-016-9516-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.