IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcini0/v7y2013i1p1-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Peldszus

    (Applied Computational Linguistics, EB Cognitive Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany)

  • Manfred Stede

    (Applied Computational Linguistics, EB Cognitive Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany)

Abstract

In this paper, the authors consider argument mining as the task of building a formal representation for an argumentative piece of text. Their goal is to provide a critical survey of the literature on both the resulting representations (i.e., argument diagramming techniques) and on the various aspects of the automatic analysis process. For representation, the authors also provide a synthesized proposal of a scheme that combines advantages from several of the earlier approaches; in addition, the authors discuss the relationship between representing argument structure and the rhetorical structure of texts in the sense of Mann and Thompsons (1988) RST. Then, for the argument mining problem, the authors also cover the literature on closely-related tasks that have been tackled in Computational Linguistics, because they think that these can contribute to more powerful argument mining systems than the first prototypes that were built in recent years. The paper concludes with the authors’ suggestions for the major challenges that should be addressed in the field of argument mining.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Peldszus & Manfred Stede, 2013. "From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey," International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), IGI Global, vol. 7(1), pages 1-31, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcini0:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:1-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jcini.2013010101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu Xiao & Jennifer Stromer-Galley & Ágnes Sándor, 2017. "Toward the Automated Detection of Individuals’ Rationales in Large-Scale Online Open Participative Activities: A Conceptual Framework," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 891-910, September.
    2. Lu Xiao & Nadia K. Conroy, 2017. "Discourse relations in rationale‐containing text‐segments," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2783-2794, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcini0:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:1-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.