IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v24y2015i4d10.1007_s10726-014-9402-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Transferable ThinkLet Based Process Design for Integrity Risk Assessment in Government Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten

    (Delft University of Technology)

  • Jur Kosterbok

    (Het Buitenhuis, Furturecenter of the Dutch Government)

  • Alain Hoekstra

    (CAOP)

Abstract

Integrity of government organizations and institutions is one of the key pillars of successful democracy. In this paper we present an approach to perform an integrity assessment in a group setting. We present a case study in which we trained two groups of practitioners to execute the integrity risk assessment according to the Collaboration Engineering approach to collaboration support. We compared their effort and results with the assessment executed by professional facilitators. For this comparison we collected data mainly from a participant perspective. The preliminary results show that there is no significant difference between the performance of the practitioners and the professional facilitators.

Suggested Citation

  • Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten & Jur Kosterbok & Alain Hoekstra, 2015. "A Transferable ThinkLet Based Process Design for Integrity Risk Assessment in Government Organizations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 595-611, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:24:y:2015:i:4:d:10.1007_s10726-014-9402-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-014-9402-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-014-9402-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-014-9402-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten & Gert-Jan Vreede & Leah R. Pietron, 2011. "A Training Approach for the Transition of Repeatable Collaboration Processes to Practitioners," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 347-371, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Kocsis & Triparna Vreede & Abdulrahman Alothaim, 2022. "Happy to Continue: Satisfaction, Commitment, and Persistence to Use Technology-Supported Collaborative Work Practices," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1235-1262, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valerie L. Bartelt & Alan R. Dennis & Lingyao Yuan & Jordan B. Barlow, 2013. "Individual Priming in Virtual Team Decision-Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 873-896, September.
    2. David Kocsis & Triparna Vreede & Abdulrahman Alothaim, 2022. "Happy to Continue: Satisfaction, Commitment, and Persistence to Use Technology-Supported Collaborative Work Practices," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1235-1262, December.
    3. L. Alberto Franco & Mie Femø Nielsen, 2018. "Examining Group Facilitation In Situ: The Use of Formulations in Facilitation Practice," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 735-756, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:24:y:2015:i:4:d:10.1007_s10726-014-9402-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.