IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v17y2008i6d10.1007_s10726-008-9110-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying Clinical Methods for Assessing Patterns of Functioning in Negotiation Processes: The Rorschach Reality-Fantasy Scale (RFS)

Author

Listed:
  • Shira Tibon

    (Bar-Ilan University
    The Academic College of Tel-Aviv Yaffo)

Abstract

This clinical paper suggests applying a new Rorschach measure, the Reality-Fantasy Scale (RFS; Tibon et al. 2005, Int J Appl Psychoanal Stud 2:40–57) for evaluating patterns of functioning in negotiation processes. The RFS is a psychoanalytically oriented diagnostic tool, designed to operationalize Winnicott’s (Playing and reality. Basic Books, New York, 1971) construct of potential or transitional space by using a paradigm that conceptualizes the Rorschach task as inviting the respondent to enter the intermediate transitional space between inner and outer reality. The RFS ranges from − 5, representing extreme reliance on fantasy (reality collapse) to + 5 representing extreme reliance on reality (fantasy collapse). A score approximating zero indicates adaptive and functional use of potential space, pointing out high level of negotiator effectiveness. A case example is presented, demonstrating the utility of the RFS in evaluating negotiator effectiveness in an encounter aimed at achieving peace agreement. Although not itself a report of a lab or field experiment the paper illustrates the potential usefulness of psychoanalytically oriented conceptualization and clinical assessment methods in negotiation research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Shira Tibon, 2008. "Applying Clinical Methods for Assessing Patterns of Functioning in Negotiation Processes: The Rorschach Reality-Fantasy Scale (RFS)," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 541-552, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:17:y:2008:i:6:d:10.1007_s10726-008-9110-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-008-9110-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-008-9110-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-008-9110-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guy Oliver Faure, 1999. "The Cultural Dimensions of Negotiation: The Chinese Case," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 187-215, May.
    2. Susan E. Brodt, 1997. "Innovative Approaches to Research on Group Decision and Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 283-287, July.
    3. Leonard Greenhalgh & Roderick Gilkey, 1997. "Clinical Assessment Methods in Negotiation Research: The Study of Narcissism and Negotiator Effectiveness," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 289-316, July.
    4. Shira Tibon, 2000. "Personality Traits and Peace Negotiations: Integrative Complexity and Attitudes toward the Middle East Peace Process," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shira Tibon Czopp & Liat Appel & Ruth Zeligman, 2014. "Relational Psychoanalytic Perspective on the Negotiation Dialogue: Using the Rorschach Inkblot Method for Assessing Integrative Complexity," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1177-1189, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shira Tibon Czopp & Liat Appel & Ruth Zeligman, 2014. "Relational Psychoanalytic Perspective on the Negotiation Dialogue: Using the Rorschach Inkblot Method for Assessing Integrative Complexity," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1177-1189, September.
    2. Melvin F. Shakun, 1999. "An ESD Computer Culture for Intercultural Problem Solving and Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 237-249, May.
    3. Marc Buelens & Mieke Woestyne & Steven Mestdagh & Dave Bouckenooghe, 2008. "Methodological Issues in Negotiation Research: A State-of-the-Art-Review," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 321-345, July.
    4. M. Buelens & M. Van De Woestyne & S. Mestdagh & D. Bouckenooghe, 2007. "Research Methods in Negotiation: 1965-2004," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/449, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    5. Julián Arévalo, editor., 2020. "Negociación y cooperación : teoría y experiencias en resolución de conflictos," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Economía, number 81, August.
    6. Kjell Hausken & John F. Moxnes, 2005. "The Dynamics Of Bilateral Exchange And Division Of Labor," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 117-137.
    7. Zhenzhong Ma & Weiwei Dong & Jie Wu & Dapeng Liang & Xiaopeng Yin, 2015. "Confucian Ideal Personality and Chinese Business Negotiation Styles: An Indigenous Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 383-400, May.
    8. S. Tibon-Czopp & L. Appel & R. Zeligman, 2016. "Assessing Personality Patterns of Functioning in a Decision-Making Ambiguous Task: The Rorschach Reality–Fantasy Scale (RFS-2)," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 65-75, January.
    9. Zhenzhong Ma & Alfred Jaeger, 2005. "Getting to Yes in China: Exploring Personality Effects in Chinese Negotiation Styles," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 415-437, September.
    10. Stephen Chen & Ronald Geluykens & Chong Ju Choi, 2006. "The importance of language in global teams: A linguistic perspective," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 679-696, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:17:y:2008:i:6:d:10.1007_s10726-008-9110-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.