IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v17y2008i2d10.1007_s10726-007-9079-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

You can’t shake hands with clenched fists: potential effects of trust assessments on the adoption of e-negotiation services

Author

Listed:
  • Ofir Turel

    (California State University, Fullerton)

  • Yufei Yuan

    (McMaster University)

Abstract

Trust in the context of e-negotiation is a multifaceted cognition about various trustees, including the e-negotiation website, the e-negotiation service provider, the other negotiator, and the neutral third party (if it exists). This set of trust cognitions is important because it can facilitate the adoption of e-negotiation services. As such, this manuscript presents a review of relevant trust-related literature streams, and integrates them into two models: (1) trust relations in e-negotiations, and (2) potential effects of trust assessments on the adoption of e-negotiation services. The trust relations model identifies and distinguishes between various facets of trust that are relevant in e-negotiations. This model facilitates a clear conceptualization and communication of trust issues in e-negotiation research. The trust effects model conceptualizes the roles of the different trust facets in predicting e-negotiation adoption behavior. Overall, these theory-based models advance the field and can serve as the basis for future investigations of trust in e-negotiations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ofir Turel & Yufei Yuan, 2008. "You can’t shake hands with clenched fists: potential effects of trust assessments on the adoption of e-negotiation services," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 141-155, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:17:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s10726-007-9079-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-007-9079-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-007-9079-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-007-9079-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert W. Kee & Robert E. Knox, 1970. "Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 14(3), pages 357-366, September.
    2. Craig D. Parks & Lorne G. Hulbert, 1995. "High And Low Trusters' Responses To Fear in a Payoff Matrix," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(4), pages 718-730, December.
    3. Ofir Turel & Yufei Yuan, 2007. "User Acceptance of Web-Based Negotiation Support Systems: The Role of Perceived Intention of the Negotiating Partner to Negotiate Online," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 451-468, September.
    4. Yufei Yuan & Milena Head & Mei Du, 2003. "The Effects of Multimedia Communication on Web-Based Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 89-109, March.
    5. Paul A. Pavlou & David Gefen, 2004. "Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 37-59, March.
    6. Katherine J. Stewart, 2003. "Trust Transfer on the World Wide Web," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 5-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gert Jan Hofstede & Catholijn M. Jonker & Tim Verwaart & Neil Yorke-Smith, 2019. "The Lemon Car Game Across Cultures: Evidence of Relational Rationality," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 849-877, October.
    2. Claude Alavoine, 2014. "Gender Issues About Negotiation: A different perception of the most important driving forces?," Working Papers 2014-407, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    3. Claude Alavoine & Ferkan Kaplanseren & Frédéric Teulon, 2014. "Teaching (and learning) negotiation: is there still room for innovation ?," Working Papers 2014-227, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    4. Bo Yu & Gregory E. Kersten & Rustam Vahidov, 2022. "An experimental examination of credible information disclosure, perception of fairness, and intention to do business in online multi-bilateral negotiations," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 217-237, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenbo Guo & Jing Betty Feng & Brad McKenna & Pengzhu Zhang, 2017. "Inter-organizational governance and trilateral trust building: a case study of crowdsourcing-based open innovation in China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(3), pages 187-207, July.
    2. Meents, S. & Verhagen, T. & Vlaar, P.W.L., 2011. "How sellers can stimulate purchasing in electronic marketplaces: Using information as a risk reduction signal," Serie Research Memoranda 0014, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    3. Suk-Joo Lee & Cheolhwi Ahn & Kelly Minjung Song & Hyunchul Ahn, 2018. "Trust and Distrust in E-Commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Shi, Yani & Sia, Choon Ling & Chen, Huaping, 2013. "Leveraging social grouping for trust building in foreign electronic commerce firms: An exploratory study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 419-428.
    5. Ben Q. Liu & Dale L. Goodhue, 2012. "Two Worlds of Trust for Potential E-Commerce Users: Humans as Cognitive Misers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1246-1262, December.
    6. Liu, Linlin & Lee, Matthew K.O. & Liu, Renjing & Chen, Jiawen, 2018. "Trust transfer in social media brand communities: The role of consumer engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-13.
    7. Stephen C. Wingreen & Natasha C. H. L. Mazey & Stephen L. Baglione & Gordon R. Storholm, 2019. "Transfer of electronic commerce trust between physical and virtual environments: experimental effects of structural assurance and situational normality," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 339-371, June.
    8. Grüner, Alina & Postel, Lea & Schumann, Jan H., 2024. "Sharing is caring? The effect of negative peer-to-peer experiences on loyalty intentions in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    9. Rajković, Borislav & Đurić, Ivan & Zarić, Vlade & Glauben, Thomas, 2021. "Gaining trust in the digital age: The potential of social media for increasing the competitiveness of small and medium enterprises," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(4).
    10. Dongmin Kim & Izak Benbasat, 2006. "The Effects of Trust-Assuring Arguments on Consumer Trust in Internet Stores: Application of Toulmin's Model of Argumentation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 286-300, September.
    11. Vitaly Skirnevskiy & David Bendig & Malte Brettel, 2017. "The Influence of Internal Social Capital on Serial Creators’ Success in Crowdfunding," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(2), pages 209-236, March.
    12. Mohammed Alharbey & Stefan Van Hemmen, 2021. "Investor Intention in Equity Crowdfunding. Does Trust Matter?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Paul A. Pavlou & Angelika Dimoka, 2006. "The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 392-414, December.
    14. Alisa Frik & Luigi Mittone, 2016. "Factors Influencing the Perceived Websites' Privacy Trustworthiness and Users' Purchase Intentions," CEEL Working Papers 1609, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    15. Friend, Scott B. & Johnson, Jeff S. & Sohi, Ravipreet S., 2018. "Propensity to trust salespeople: A contingent multilevel-multisource examination," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-9.
    16. Xiao, Lin & Zhang, Yucheng & Fu, Bin, 2019. "Exploring the moderators and causal process of trust transfer in online-to-offline commerce," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 214-226.
    17. Xusen Cheng & Fei Guo & Jin Chen & Kejiang Li & Yihui Zhang & Peng Gao, 2019. "Exploring the Trust Influencing Mechanism of Robo-Advisor Service: A Mixed Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Wen-Kuei Wu & Shu-Chin Huang & Hsiao-Chung Wu & Maw-Liann Shyu, 2021. "The Effects of the Social Influence Approach on Swift Guanxi, Trust and Repurchase Intention When Considering Buyer Dependence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Hong, Ilyoo B. & Cho, Hwihyung, 2011. "The impact of consumer trust on attitudinal loyalty and purchase intentions in B2C e-marketplaces: Intermediary trust vs. seller trust," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 469-479.
    20. Verhagen, T., 2008. "Investigating the impact of C2C electronic marketplace quality on trust," Serie Research Memoranda 0008, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:17:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s10726-007-9079-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.