IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v14y1970i3p357-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion

Author

Listed:
  • Herbert W. Kee

    (Department of Psychology, Northwestern University)

  • Robert E. Knox

    (Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Herbert W. Kee & Robert E. Knox, 1970. "Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 14(3), pages 357-366, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:14:y:1970:i:3:p:357-366
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277001400307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277001400307
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277001400307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles G. McClintock & Steven P. McNeel, 1966. "Reward level and game playing behavior1," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 10(1), pages 98-102, March.
    2. Stuart Oskamp & Daniel Perlman, 1965. "Factors affecting cooperation in a Prisoner's Dilemma game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 9(3), pages 359-374, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Friend, Scott B. & Johnson, Jeff S. & Sohi, Ravipreet S., 2018. "Propensity to trust salespeople: A contingent multilevel-multisource examination," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-9.
    2. F. David Schoorman & Roger C. Mayer & James H. Davis, 2016. "Empowerment in veterinary clinics: the role of trust in delegation," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 76-90, April.
    3. Yang, Jinbi & Sia, Choon Ling & Ou, Carol, 2015. "Identify the antecedents of distrust in a website," Other publications TiSEM 27db9390-f2e0-4006-ab0c-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Eunyoung Choi & Kun Chang Lee, 2019. "Effect of Trust in Domain-Specific Information of Safety, Brand Loyalty, and Perceived Value for Cosmetics on Purchase Intentions in Mobile E-Commerce Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Ofir Turel & Yufei Yuan, 2008. "You can’t shake hands with clenched fists: potential effects of trust assessments on the adoption of e-negotiation services," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 141-155, March.
    6. C. E. Jager, 2017. "A Question of Trust: the Pursuit of Consumer Trust in the Financial Sector by Means of EU Legislation," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 25-49, March.
    7. D. Harrison McKnight & Vivek Choudhury & Charles Kacmar, 2002. "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 334-359, September.
    8. Bülbül, Dilek, 2013. "Determinants of trust in banking networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 236-248.
    9. Xusen Cheng & Guopeng Yin & Aida Azadegan & Gwendolyn Kolfschoten, 2016. "Trust Evolvement in Hybrid Team Collaboration: A Longitudinal Case Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 267-288, March.
    10. Olsen, Carmen & Gold, Anna, 2018. "Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 127-141.
    11. Bahbouhi, Jalal Eddine & Moussa, Najem, 2017. "Prisoner’s dilemma game model for e-commerce," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 292(C), pages 128-144.
    12. Helena Bulińska-Stangrecka & Anna Bagieńska, 2018. "Investigating the Links of Interpersonal Trust in Telecommunications Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Grace Ibe-enwo & Nicholas Igbudu & Zanete Garanti & Temitope Popoola, 2019. "Assessing the Relevance of Green Banking Practice on Bank Loyalty: The Mediating Effect of Green Image and Bank Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Wenbo Guo & Jing Betty Feng & Brad McKenna & Pengzhu Zhang, 2017. "Inter-organizational governance and trilateral trust building: a case study of crowdsourcing-based open innovation in China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(3), pages 187-207, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jack E. Vincent & James O. Tindell, 1969. "Alternative cooperative strategies in a bargaining game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 13(4), pages 494-510, December.
    2. Jack E. Vincent & Edward W. Schwerin, 1971. "Ratios of force and escalation in a game situation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 15(4), pages 489-511, December.
    3. Carol J. Orwant & Jack E. Orwant, 1970. "A comparison of interpreted and abstract versions of mixed-motive games," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 14(1), pages 91-97, March.
    4. Chen-Bo Zhong & Jeffrey Loewenstein & J. Keith Murnighan, 2007. "Speaking the Same Language," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 51(3), pages 431-456, June.
    5. E. Alan Hartman, 1980. "Motivational Bases of Sex Differences in Choice Behavior," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(3), pages 455-475, September.
    6. Vi Cao, 2022. "An epistemic approach to explaining cooperation in the finitely repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 51(1), pages 53-85, March.
    7. Jinkwon Lee, 2007. "Repetition And Financial Incentives In Economics Experiments," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 628-681, July.
    8. Robert Axelrod, 1967. "Conflict of interest: an axiomatic approach," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 11(1), pages 87-99, March.
    9. Donnel Wallace & Paul Rothaus, 1969. "Communication, group loyalty, and trust in the PD game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 13(3), pages 370-380, September.
    10. Barbara Lichner Ingram & Stephen E. Berger, 1977. "Sex-Role Orientation, Defensiveness, and Competitiveness in Women," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(3), pages 501-518, September.
    11. Stuart Oskamp & Daniel Perlman, 1966. "Effects of friendship and disliking on cooperation in a mixed-motive game1," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 10(2), pages 221-226, June.
    12. Chester A. Insko & John Schopler & Stephen M. Drigotas & Kenneth A. Graetz & James Kennedy & Chante Cox & Garry Bornstein, 1993. "The Role of Communication in Interindividual-Intergroup Discontinuity," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(1), pages 108-138, March.
    13. Anatol Rapoport, 1975. "Comments on “When Martyrdom Paysâ€," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 19(4), pages 663-664, December.
    14. Vincent Skotko & Daniel Langmeyer & David Lundgren, 1974. "Sex Differences as Artifact in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 18(4), pages 707-713, December.
    15. Kenneth W. Terhune, 1974. ""Wash-In," "Wash-Out," and Systemic Effects in Extended Prisoner's Dilemma," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 18(4), pages 656-685, December.
    16. William M. Knapp & Jerome E. Podell, 1968. "Mental patients, prisoners, and students with simulated partners in a mixed-motive game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 12(2), pages 235-241, June.
    17. Matthew W. Steele & James T. Tedeschi, 1967. "Matrix indices and strategy choices in mixed-motive games," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 11(2), pages 198-205, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:14:y:1970:i:3:p:357-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.