IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/gjofsm/v25y2024i4d10.1007_s40171-024-00413-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexibility in the WTO: Navigating the Dynamics of Multilateralism Using Grounded Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Pushkar Pushp

    (FORE School of Management)

  • Arbuda Sharma

    (FORE School of Management)

  • Faisal Ahmed

    (FORE School of Management)

Abstract

This paper explores conflicting national perspectives and evolution of World Trade Organisation (WTO) through a flexible systems approach. It explores international trade system’s conflicting thesis antithesis of global trade regimes/regional trade agreements vis-a-vis national perspective/interest. The multilateral trade framework acts as a facilitator for equal trade norms for all, accidentally creating a barrier for several developing and less developed nations to participate in the “free trade regime”. Literary evidence suggests these nations participate in the regional trade agreements (RTAs) which may not be very beneficial for the nations participating in it. Adding to the damage, these countries distance themselves from WTO, heading for another dent on their economy. In the era of globalisation appearing like a “Zero Sum Game” for economies and therefore, a system in an institutional framework essentially desires “flexibility” and change with changing times. When an organisation gets nudged by the diverse views of its members and detects belligerence and discontent among member nations, it is time for organisational change, a change in the current institutional paradigm towards organisational flexibility. To explore these conflicting perspectives, the grounded theory methodology has been used in this study. The research design is exploratory in nature. Using judgemental and snowball sampling of international experts in the area of multilateral trade and international trade negotiations, the thematic coding paradigm has been drawn. The process has been iterated, and cross-validation has been done with the literature after deploying grounded theory methodology. Subsequent, open, axial, and selective coding has been performed and data triangulation for validation of themes has been done. In addressing the dominant theme evolved from the study, the institutional crevice within the global trading system requires a comprehensive approach. This begins with reinstating conducive conditions for negotiating global trade liberalisation and facilitating consensus among WTO member countries with modernised regulatory framework and augments its global decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Pushkar Pushp & Arbuda Sharma & Faisal Ahmed, 2024. "Flexibility in the WTO: Navigating the Dynamics of Multilateralism Using Grounded Theory," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(4), pages 805-823, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:25:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40171-024-00413-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40171-024-00413-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40171-024-00413-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40171-024-00413-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David S. Jacks & Dennis Novy, 2020. "Trade Blocs and Trade Wars during the Interwar Period," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 15(1), pages 119-136, January.
    2. Eichengreen, Barry & Irwin, Douglas A., 1995. "Trade blocs, currency blocs and the reorientation of world trade in the 1930s," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1-2), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Peter A. Petri & Michael G. Plummer, 2016. "The Economic Effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Estimates," Working Paper Series WP16-2, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    4. Arbuda Sharma & Sanjay Patro & Harish Chaudhry, 2021. "Brand identity and culture interaction in the Indian context: a grounded approach," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 31-54, March.
    5. Richard Baldwin, 2010. "Unilateral Tariff Liberalisation," NBER Working Papers 16600, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Bhagwati, Jagdish, 2008. "Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195331653.
    7. Mohammad Asim & Saboohi Nasim, 2022. "Modeling Enterprise Flexibility and Competitiveness for Indian Pharmaceutical Firms: A Qualitative Study," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 551-571, December.
    8. Jagdish Bhagwati, 1992. "Regionalism versus Multilateralism," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 535-556, September.
    9. Kent Jones, 2023. "Populism, Globalization, and the Prospects for Restoring the WTO," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 181-192.
    10. Jason H. Grant & Dayton M. Lambert, 2008. "Do Regional Trade Agreements Increase Members' Agricultural Trade?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(3), pages 765-782.
    11. Goodrich, Leland M., 1947. "From League of Nations to United Nations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 3-21, February.
    12. Richard Baldwin, 2016. "The World Trade Organization and the Future of Multilateralism," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 95-116, Winter.
    13. Patrick Low, 2014. "Preferentialism in Trade Relations : Challenges for the World Trade Organization," Trade Working Papers 24161, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    14. Richard Pomfret, 2021. "‘Regionalism’ and the global trade system," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(9), pages 2496-2514, September.
    15. Bijoy Chandra Das & Fakhrul Hasan & Soma Rani Sutradhar & Sujana Shafique, 2023. "Ukraine–Russia Conflict and Stock Markets Reactions in Europe," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 395-407, September.
    16. Chad P. Bown, 2017. "Mega-Regional Trade Agreements and the Future of the WTO," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(1), pages 107-112, February.
    17. Barry Eichengreen, 1986. "The Political Economy of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff," NBER Working Papers 2001, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Gary Hufbauer & Cathleen Cimino, 2013. "What Future for the WTO?," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 394-410, December.
    19. Davis, Lewis S., 2010. "Institutional flexibility and economic growth," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 306-320, September.
    20. Patrick Low, 2014. "Preferentialism in Trade Relations : Challenges for the World Trade Organization," Governance Working Papers 24161, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    21. Sun, Kejuan & Xiao, Hao & Jia, Zhen & Tang, Bin, 2023. "Estimating the effects of regional value chains of the RCEP in a GVC-CGE model," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    22. Low, Patrick, 2014. "Preferentialism in Trade Relations: Challenges for the World Trade Organization," ADBI Working Papers 478, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Faude, 2020. "Breaking Gridlock: How Path Dependent Layering Enhances Resilience in Global Trade Governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(4), pages 448-457, September.
    2. Sheldon, Ian M. & Chow, Daniel C.K. & McGuire, William, 2017. "Trade Liberalization and Institutional Constraints on Moves to Protectionism: Multilateralism vs. Regionalism," 2018 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 5-7, 2018, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 266305, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Zakaria Sorgho, 2016. "RTAs' Proliferation and Trade-diversion Effects: Evidence of the ‘Spaghetti Bowl’ Phenomenon," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 285-300, February.
    4. Sorgho, Zakaria, 2014. "RTAs’ Proliferation and Trade-diversion effects: Evidence of the “Spaghetti Bowl” Phenomenon," MPRA Paper 60503, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. David M Higgins & Brian D Varian, 2021. "Britain’s Empire Marketing Board and the failure of soft trade policy, 1926–33 [Bringing another empire alive? The Empire Marketing Board and the construction of Dominion identity, 1926–1933]," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 25(4), pages 780-805.
    6. Choong, Pai Wei & khalifah, noor & Mohd Nor, Abu Hassan Shaari & Ismail, Mohd Adib, 2018. "Free Trade Agreements and Production Sharing in Malaysian Manufacturing Industries," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 52(3), pages 91-106.
    7. Kris James Mitchener Author e-mail: kmitchener@scu.edu & Kirsten Wandschneider Author e-mail: kirsten.wandschneider@univie.ac.at & Kevin Hjortshøj O’Rourke Author e-mail: akevin.orourke@nyu.edu, 2021. "The Smoot-Hawley Trade War," Working Papers 20210061, New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Social Science, revised Mar 2021.
    8. Kris James Mitchener & Kevin Hjortshøj O'Rourke & Kirsten Wandschneider, 2022. "The Smoot-Hawley Trade War," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(647), pages 2500-2533.
    9. Sorgho, Zakaria, 2015. "RTAs' Proliferation and Trade-Diversion Effects: Evidence of the "Spaghetti Bowl" Phenomenon," Working Papers 206223, University of Laval, Center for Research on the Economics of the Environment, Agri-food, Transports and Energy (CREATE).
    10. Campos, Rodolfo G. & Estefania-Flores, Julia & Furceri, Davide & Timini, Jacopo, 2023. "Geopolitical fragmentation and trade," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 1289-1315.
    11. Latorre, María C. & Yonezawa, Hidemichi, 2018. "Stopped TTIP? Its potential impact on the world and the role of neglected FDI," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 99-120.
    12. Xing Yao & Yongzhong Zhang & Rizwana Yasmeen & Zhen Cai, 2021. "The impact of preferential trade agreements on bilateral trade: A structural gravity model analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Faude, Benjamin, 2020. "Breaking gridlock: how path dependent layering enhances resilience in global trade governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103927, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Hoe Ee Khor & Diwa C. Guinigundo & Masahiro Kawai & Kimi Xu Jiang, 2022. "Introduction and Overview," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Hoe Ee Khor & Diwa C Guinigundo & Masahiro Kawai (ed.), Trauma to Triumph Rising from the Ashes of the Asian Financial Crisis, chapter 1, pages 3-43, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    15. Jovanović, Miroslav, 2016. "Emerging Mega International Blocs: Limits and Prospects," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 69(4), pages 271-316.
    16. Samuel Admassu, 2020. "The trade creation effects of Africa’s reciprocal vis-à-vis non-reciprocal trade agreements," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(6), pages 2717-2730, December.
    17. Tristan Kohl, 2014. "Do we really know that trade agreements increase trade?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 150(3), pages 443-469, August.
    18. Beckman, Jayson & Ivanic, Maros & Shaik, Saleem, 2022. "How Bilateral Trade Deals Get in the Way of Multilateral Agreements," Conference papers 333437, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Vollrath, Thomas L. & Hallahan, Charles B., 2011. "Reciprocal Trade Agreements: Impacts on Bilateral Trade Expansion and Contraction in the World Agricultural Marketplace," Economic Research Report 102755, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Thomas L. Vollrath & Mark J. Gehlhar & Charles B. Hallahan, 2009. "Bilateral Import Protection, Free Trade Agreements, and Other Factors Influencing Trade Flows in Agriculture and Clothing," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 298-317, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:25:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40171-024-00413-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.