IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/futbus/v9y2023i1d10.1186_s43093-023-00231-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors determining internal auditors’ behavioral intention to use computer-assisted auditing techniques: an extension of the UTAUT model and an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Almagrashi

    (Jazan University)

  • Abdulwahab Mujalli

    (Jazan University)

  • Tehmina Khan

    (RMIT University)

  • Osama Attia

    (Jazan University
    Port Said University)

Abstract

Purpose Computer-assisted audit techniques (CAATs) are used by auditors to automate some of their tasks. Since most transactions in accounting are computerized, auditing of accounting data follows this process as well. During the last two decades, many studies on technology acceptance have been published, and several new models proposed. This study aims to develop and empirically test a model to predict the factors affecting internal auditors’ behavioral intentions regarding CAATs. Design/methodology/approach This study explored the behavioral intention to use CAATs from the perspective of internal auditors by applying the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. Added to this were satisfaction, trust, and organizational influence to understand people’s usage traits. Through an online survey the data were gathered from internal auditors in all Saudi public sector agencies. Structural equation modeling helped to analyze the data and support hypotheses or otherwise. Findings Effort expectancy, performance expectancy, social and organizational influences, facilitating conditions, trust, satisfaction, and behavioral intention are the main drivers of CAATs. Practical implications This study contributes to existing technology theory by expanding our understanding of the factors influencing CAATs adoption. Moreover, comprehending those determinants is extremely important to legislators. regulators and policymakers in the public sector. This study increases our knowledge about the adoption of CAATs by addressing it at the individual level instead of the organizational level. The results are consistent with the UTAUT model and deliver a practical reference for public sector officials and decision-makers involved in designing CAATs for government departments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Almagrashi & Abdulwahab Mujalli & Tehmina Khan & Osama Attia, 2023. "Factors determining internal auditors’ behavioral intention to use computer-assisted auditing techniques: an extension of the UTAUT model and an empirical study," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:futbus:v:9:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1186_s43093-023-00231-2
    DOI: 10.1186/s43093-023-00231-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s43093-023-00231-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s43093-023-00231-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-10-2015-0079 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Carlos Tam & Diogo Santos & Tiago Oliveira, 2020. "Exploring the influential factors of continuance intention to use mobile Apps: Extending the expectation confirmation model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 243-257, February.
    3. Gonzalez, George C. & Sharma, Pratyush N. & Galletta, Dennis F., 2012. "The antecedents of the use of continuous auditing in the internal auditing context," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 248-262.
    4. Anol Bhattacherjee & Chieh-Peng Lin, 2015. "A unified model of IT continuance: three complementary perspectives and crossover effects," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 364-373, July.
    5. Gefen, David, 2000. "E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 725-737, December.
    6. Aidi Ahmi & Simon Kent, 2013. "The utilisation of generalized audit software (GAS) by external auditors," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(2), pages 88-113, January.
    7. Pizzi, Simone & Venturelli, Andrea & Variale, Michele & Macario, Giuseppe Pio, 2021. "Assessing the impacts of digital transformation on internal auditing: A bibliometric analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Robert L. Braun & Harold E. Davis, 2003. "Computer‐assisted audit tools and techniques: analysis and perspectives," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(9), pages 725-731, December.
    9. Hyo-Jeong Kim & Amr Kotb & Mohamed Khaled Eldaly, 2016. "The use of generalized audit software by Egyptian external auditors," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(4), pages 456-478, November.
    10. repec:eme:maj000:02686901311284522 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. DeLone, William H. & McLean, Ephraim R., 2016. "Information Systems Success Measurement," Foundations and Trends(R) in Information Systems, now publishers, vol. 2(1), pages 1-116, August.
    12. Curtis, Mary B. & Payne, Elizabeth A., 2008. "An examination of contextual factors and individual characteristics affecting technology implementation decisions in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 104-121.
    13. Mousa Albashrawi & Luvai Motiwalla, 2019. "Privacy and Personalization in Continued Usage Intention of Mobile Banking: An Integrative Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1031-1043, October.
    14. Vanessa Ratten, 2014. "Behavioral Intentions to Adopt Technological Innovations: The Role of Trust, Innovation and Performance," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, July.
    15. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    16. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    17. Siew, Eu-Gene & Rosli, Khairina & Yeow, Paul H.P., 2020. "Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    18. Mary B. Curtis & Elizabeth A. Payne, 2014. "Modeling voluntary CAAT utilization decisions in auditing," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(4), pages 304-326, April.
    19. Yueh-Ying Tsai & Cheng-Min Chao & Hong-Mau Lin & Bor-Wen Cheng, 2018. "Nursing staff intentions to continuously use a blended e-learning system from an integrative perspective," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2495-2513, November.
    20. Kim, Hyo-Jeong & Mannino, Michael & Nieschwietz, Robert J., 2009. "Information technology acceptance in the internal audit profession: Impact of technology features and complexity," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 214-228.
    21. repec:eme:maj000:maj-07-2013-0903 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Ravi Seethamraju & Krishna Sundar Diatha & Shashank Garg, 2018. "Erratum to: Intention to Use a Mobile-Based Information Technology Solution for Tuberculosis Treatment Monitoring – Applying a UTAUT Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 183-183, February.
    23. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    24. Bierstaker, James & Janvrin, Diane & Lowe, D. Jordan, 2014. "What factors influence auditors' use of computer-assisted audit techniques?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 67-74.
    25. Sheppard, Blair H & Hartwick, Jon & Warshaw, Paul R, 1988. "The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(3), pages 325-343, December.
    26. Taylor, David G. & Strutton, David, 2010. "Has e-marketing come of age? Modeling historical influences on post-adoption era Internet consumer behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 950-956, September.
    27. repec:eme:maj000:02686900310500488 is not listed on IDEAS
    28. repec:eme:ijlma0:ijlma-12-2017-0304 is not listed on IDEAS
    29. Mary B. Curtis & Elizabeth A. Payne, 2014. "Modeling voluntary CAAT utilization decisions in auditing," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 29(4), pages 304-326, April.
    30. Diah Isnaini Asiati & Wibowo & Husein Umar & Tony Sitinjak, 2019. "The Effects of Service Quality, Image and Trust on Satisfaction and Its Impact on Syari¡¯ah Bank Customer Loyalty in Palembang," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 295-316, March.
    31. Ravi Seethamraju & Krishna Sundar Diatha & Shashank Garg, 2018. "Intention to Use a Mobile-Based Information Technology Solution for Tuberculosis Treatment Monitoring – Applying a UTAUT Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 163-181, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed Almgrashi & Abdulwahab Mujalli, 2024. "The Influence of Sustainable Risk Management on the Implementation of Risk-Based Internal Auditing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Afsay, Akram & Tahriri, Arash & Rezaee, Zabihollah, 2023. "A meta-analysis of factors affecting acceptance of information technology in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Abdalwali Lutfi & Hamza Alqudah, 2023. "The Influence of Technological Factors on the Computer-Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques Usage during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Kamal Abubker Abrahim Sleiman & Wang Jin & Lan Juanli & Hong Zhen Lei & Jingyi Cheng & Yuanxin Ouyang & Wenge Rong, 2022. "The Factors of Continuance Intention to Use Mobile Payments in Sudan," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    4. Abdalwali Lutfi, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Continuance Intention to Use Accounting Information System in Jordanian SMEs from the Perspectives of UTAUT: Top Management Support and Self-Efficacy as Predictor Factors," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Siew, Eu-Gene & Rosli, Khairina & Yeow, Paul H.P., 2020. "Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    6. Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2013. "Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English E-Learning Websites in Taiwan," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    7. Bierstaker, James & Janvrin, Diane & Lowe, D. Jordan, 2014. "What factors influence auditors' use of computer-assisted audit techniques?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 67-74.
    8. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    9. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    10. Kamal Abubker Abrahim Sleiman & Lan Juanli & Hongzhen Lei & Ru Liu & Yuanxin Ouyang & Wenge Rong, 2021. "User Trust levels and Adoption of Mobile Payment Systems in China: An Empirical Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    11. Banu Demirel & Ayça Kübra Hızarcı Payne, 2018. "Social Innovation Adoption Behavior: The Case of Zumbara," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Cao, XinYu & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2005. "The Intended and Actual Adoption of Online Purchasing: A Brief Review of Recent Literature," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt095934s0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    13. Mariani, Marcello M. & Ek Styven, Maria & Teulon, Fréderic, 2021. "Explaining the intention to use digital personal data stores: An empirical study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    14. Arif Hasan & S. K. Gupta, 2020. "Exploring Tourists’ Behavioural Intentions Towards Use of Select Mobile Wallets for Digital Payments," Paradigm, , vol. 24(2), pages 177-194, December.
    15. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Banita Lal & Michael D. Williams & Marc Clement, 2017. "Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 549-568, June.
    16. Zeleke Siraye Asnakew, 2020. "Customers’ Continuance Intention to Use Mobile Banking: Development and Testing of an Integrated Model," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 123-146, April.
    17. D. Harrison McKnight & Vivek Choudhury & Charles Kacmar, 2002. "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 334-359, September.
    18. Jasmine A. L. Yeap & T. Ramayah & Pedro Soto-Acosta, 2016. "Factors propelling the adoption of m-learning among students in higher education," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(4), pages 323-338, November.
    19. Mălăescu, Irina & Sutton, Steve G., 2015. "The effects of decision aid structural restrictiveness on cognitive load, perceived usefulness, and reuse intentions," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 16-36.
    20. Giang-Do Nguyen & Thu-Hien Thi Dao, 2024. "Factors influencing continuance intention to use mobile banking: an extended expectation-confirmation model with moderating role of trust," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:futbus:v:9:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1186_s43093-023-00231-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.