IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/flsman/v33y2021i3d10.1007_s10696-020-09389-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating shifting bottleneck identification in assembly line balancing problem using an artificial immune system approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Nor Akmal Khalid

    (Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Umi Kalsom Yusof

    (Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM))

Abstract

The manufacturing industry has evolved in the past few years due to the competitive global economy where the performance of its assembly line operations is primarily dependent upon optimum resource utilization. The assembly line operations are balanced among the available resources to obtain an equal amount of workload to achieve optimum resource utilization, called the assembly line balancing (ALB) problem. Various approaches have been proposed to solve the ALB problem, which is broadly categorized as exact, heuristic, and meta-heuristic approaches. Although solving the ALB problem is crucial, a bottleneck may still occur over the next operation stages. By using problem-specific information (bottleneck identification), it is expected to improve the solution quality of the ALB problem. As such, the contribution of this study is the computational method, namely as the swarm of immune cells with bottleneck identification (SIC+) approach, where both the ALB and bottleneck identification problems are addressed. In addition to the flexible problem representation, the SIC+ approach is equipped with a discrete bottleneck simulator to simulate the bottleneck scenario and bottleneck-specific operators to redistribute the machine workload of the identified bottleneck machine. The approach was tested on 24 benchmark data sets of the ALB problem, and the impact of incorporating bottleneck identification was illustrated. The experimental results show that the proposed SIC+ approach has achieved a total of 66.12% optimal solution over all instances of the benchmark data sets and has been compared with approaches from the literature where high-quality solutions were statistically justified.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Nor Akmal Khalid & Umi Kalsom Yusof, 2021. "Incorporating shifting bottleneck identification in assembly line balancing problem using an artificial immune system approach," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 717-749, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:33:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10696-020-09389-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10696-020-09389-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10696-020-09389-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10696-020-09389-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scholl, Armin & Becker, Christian, 2006. "State-of-the-art exact and heuristic solution procedures for simple assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(3), pages 666-693, February.
    2. Scholl, Armin, 1995. "Balancing and sequencing of assembly lines," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 9690, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Glock, C. H. & Jaber, M. Y., 2013. "Learning effects and the phenomenon of moving bottlenecks in a two-stage production system," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 62486, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Iwona Paprocka & Bożena Skołud, 2017. "A hybrid multi-objective immune algorithm for predictive and reactive scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 165-182, April.
    5. Ruiz, Rubén & Maroto, Concepciøn & Alcaraz, Javier, 2006. "Two new robust genetic algorithms for the flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 461-476, October.
    6. Audrey Cerqueus & Xavier Delorme, 2019. "A branch-and-bound method for the bi-objective simple line assembly balancing problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(18), pages 5640-5659, September.
    7. Yaping Ren & Daoyuan Yu & Chaoyong Zhang & Guangdong Tian & Leilei Meng & Xiaoqiang Zhou, 2017. "An improved gravitational search algorithm for profit-oriented partial disassembly line balancing problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(24), pages 7302-7316, December.
    8. Morrison, David R. & Sewell, Edward C. & Jacobson, Sheldon H., 2014. "An application of the branch, bound, and remember algorithm to a new simple assembly line balancing dataset," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 403-409.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. H. Alavidoost & M. H. Fazel Zarandi & Mosahar Tarimoradi & Yaser Nemati, 2017. "Modified genetic algorithm for simple straight and U-shaped assembly line balancing with fuzzy processing times," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 313-336, February.
    2. Bukchin, Yossi & Raviv, Tal, 2018. "Constraint programming for solving various assembly line balancing problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 57-68.
    3. Shibasaki, Rui S. & Rossi, André & Gurevsky, Evgeny, 2024. "A new upper bound based on Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition to maximize the stability radius of a simple assembly line under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 1015-1030.
    4. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    5. Eduardo Álvarez-Miranda & Jordi Pereira & Harold Torrez-Meruvia & Mariona Vilà, 2021. "A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for the Simple Assembly Line Balancing Problem with a Fixed Number of Workstations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Scholl, Armin & Fliedner, Malte & Boysen, Nils, 2010. "Absalom: Balancing assembly lines with assignment restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 688-701, February.
    7. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2013. "A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solutionapproaches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 259-277.
    8. Walter, Rico & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2021. "SALSA: Combining branch-and-bound with dynamic programming to smoothen workloads in simple assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 857-873.
    9. Moreira, Mayron César O. & Costa, Alysson M., 2013. "Hybrid heuristics for planning job rotation schedules in assembly lines with heterogeneous workers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 552-560.
    10. García-Villoria, Alberto & Corominas, Albert & Nadal, Adrià & Pastor, Rafael, 2018. "Solving the accessibility windows assembly line problem level 1 and variant 1 (AWALBP-L1-1) with precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 882-895.
    11. Raphael Kramer & Mauro Dell’Amico & Manuel Iori, 2017. "A batching-move iterated local search algorithm for the bin packing problem with generalized precedence constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(21), pages 6288-6304, November.
    12. Borba, Leonardo & Ritt, Marcus & Miralles, Cristóbal, 2018. "Exact and heuristic methods for solving the Robotic Assembly Line Balancing Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 146-156.
    13. Pereira, Jordi, 2016. "Procedures for the bin packing problem with precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 794-806.
    14. Chica, Manuel & Bautista, Joaquín & Cordón, Óscar & Damas, Sergio, 2016. "A multiobjective model and evolutionary algorithms for robust time and space assembly line balancing under uncertain demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 55-68.
    15. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte, 2008. "A versatile algorithm for assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 39-56, January.
    16. Pereira, Jordi & Ritt, Marcus, 2023. "Exact and heuristic methods for a workload allocation problem with chain precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 387-398.
    17. Otto, Alena & Otto, Christian & Scholl, Armin, 2013. "Systematic data generation and test design for solution algorithms on the example of SALBPGen for assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 33-45.
    18. Lopes, Thiago Cantos & Pastre, Giuliano Vidal & Michels, Adalberto Sato & Magatão, Leandro, 2020. "Flexible multi-manned assembly line balancing problem: Model, heuristic procedure, and lower bounds for line length minimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    19. Vilà, Mariona & Pereira, Jordi, 2013. "An enumeration procedure for the assembly line balancing problem based on branching by non-decreasing idle time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 106-113.
    20. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Scholl, Armin, 2008. "Assembly line balancing: Which model to use when," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 509-528, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:33:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10696-020-09389-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.