IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v25y2024i7d10.1007_s10198-023-01649-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-effectiveness of two online interventions supporting self-care for eczema for parents/carers and young people

Author

Listed:
  • Tracey H. Sach

    (University of East Anglia
    University of Southampton)

  • Mary Onoja

    (University of East Anglia)

  • Holly Clarke

    (University of East Anglia)

  • Miriam Santer

    (University of Southampton)

  • Ingrid Muller

    (University of Southampton)

  • Taeko Becque

    (University of Southampton)

  • Beth Stuart

    (University of Southampton
    Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London)

  • Julie Hooper

    (University of Southampton)

  • Mary Steele

    (University of Southampton)

  • Sylvia Wilczynska

    (King’s Clinical Trial Unit, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience)

  • Matthew J. Ridd

    (Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol)

  • Amanda Roberts

    (University of Nottingham)

  • Amina Ahmed

    (University of Nottingham)

  • Lucy Yardley

    (University of Southampton)

  • Paul Little

    (University of Southampton)

  • Kate Greenwell

    (University of Southampton
    University of Southampton
    University of Bristol)

  • Katy Sivyer

    (University of Southampton
    University of Bristol)

  • Jacqui Nuttall

    (University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Gareth Griffiths

    (University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Sandra Lawton

    (The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Sinéad M. Langan

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Laura Howells

    (University of Nottingham, Applied Health Services Research Building (Building Number 42), University Park)

  • Paul Leighton

    (University of Nottingham, Applied Health Services Research Building (Building Number 42), University Park)

  • Hywel C. Williams

    (University of Nottingham, Applied Health Services Research Building (Building Number 42), University Park)

  • Kim S. Thomas

    (University of Nottingham, Applied Health Services Research Building (Building Number 42), University Park)

Abstract

Objective To estimate the cost-effectiveness of online behavioral interventions (EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) designed to support eczema self-care management for parents/carers and young people from an NHS perspective. Methods Two within-trial economic evaluations, using regression-based approaches, adjusting for baseline and pre-specified confounder variables, were undertaken alongside two independent, pragmatic, parallel group, unmasked randomized controlled trials, recruiting through primary care. Trial 1 recruited 340 parents/carers of children aged 0–12 years and Trial 2 337 young people aged 13–25 years with eczema scored ≥ 5 on Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Participants were randomized (1:1) to online intervention plus usual care or usual care alone. Resource use, collected via medical notes review, was valued using published unit costs in UK £Sterling 2021. Quality-of-life was elicited using proxy CHU-9D in Trial 1 and self-report EQ-5D-5L in Trial 2. Results The intervention was dominant (cost saving and more effective) with a high probability of cost-effectiveness (> 68%) in most analyses. The exception was the complete case cost–utility analysis for Trial 1 (omitting participants with children aged

Suggested Citation

  • Tracey H. Sach & Mary Onoja & Holly Clarke & Miriam Santer & Ingrid Muller & Taeko Becque & Beth Stuart & Julie Hooper & Mary Steele & Sylvia Wilczynska & Matthew J. Ridd & Amanda Roberts & Amina Ahme, 2024. "Cost-effectiveness of two online interventions supporting self-care for eczema for parents/carers and young people," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(7), pages 1165-1176, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-023-01649-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine Stevens, 2012. "Valuation of the Child Health Utility 9D Index," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 729-747, August.
    2. Kamilla Koszorú & Krisztina Hajdu & Valentin Brodszky & Alex Bató & L. Hunor Gergely & Anikó Kovács & Zsuzsanna Beretzky & Miklós Sárdy & Andrea Szegedi & Fanni Rencz, 2023. "Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L descriptive systems and utilities in atopic dermatitis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(1), pages 139-152, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ratcliffe, Julie & Huynh, Elisabeth & Chen, Gang & Stevens, Katherine & Swait, Joffre & Brazier, John & Sawyer, Michael & Roberts, Rachel & Flynn, Terry, 2016. "Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 48-59.
    2. Ruvini M. Hettiarachchi & Peter Arrow & Sameera Senanayake & Hannah Carter & David Brain & Richard Norman & Utsana Tonmukayawul & Lisa Jamieson & Sanjeewa Kularatna, 2023. "Developing an Australian utility value set for the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale-4D (ECOHIS-4D) using a discrete choice experiment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(8), pages 1285-1296, November.
    3. Huang, Li & Devlin, Nancy & Chen, Gang & Dalziel, Kim, 2024. "A happiness approach to valuing health states for children," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    4. Rissanen, Elisa & Karjalainen, Piia & Kiviruusu, Olli & Kankaanpää, Eila & Aronen, Eeva T. & Haula, Taru & Sääksvuori, Lauri & Vornanen, Riitta & Linnosmaa, Ismo, 2024. "Cost-effectiveness of a parenting program to reduce children’s behavioral problems among families receiving child protection services and other family support services – A randomized controlled trial," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Jennifer Hafekost & Sarah Johnson & David Lawrence & Michael Sawyer & John Ainley & Cathrine Mihalopoulos & Stephen R. Zubrick, 2016. "Introducing ‘Young Minds Matter’," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 49(4), pages 503-514, December.
    6. Rachael Maree Hunter & Mark Isaac & Alessandra Frigiola & David Blundell & Kate Brown & Kate Bull, 2013. "Lifetime Costs and Outcomes of Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot Compared to Natural Progression of the Disease: Great Ormond Street Hospital Cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-7, March.
    7. Eve Wittenberg, 2012. "Valuing Children’s Health," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 633-635, August.
    8. Julio Gallego-Méndez & Jorge Perez-Gomez & José Ignacio Calzada-Rodríguez & Ángel Manuel Denche-Zamorano & María Mendoza-Muñoz & Jorge Carlos-Vivas & Miguel Ángel Garcia-Gordillo & Jose C. Adsuar, 2020. "Relationship between Health-Related Quality of Life and Physical Activity in Children with Hyperactivity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Ruslan Jabrayilov & Antoinette D I van Asselt & Karin M Vermeulen & Sheri Volger & Patrick Detzel & Livia Dainelli & Paul F M Krabbe & for the Pediatrics expert group, 2018. "A descriptive system for the Infant health-related Quality of life Instrument (IQI): Measuring health with a mobile app," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Benjamin M. Craig & Wolfgang Greiner & Derek S. Brown & Bryce B. Reeve, 2016. "Valuation of Child Health‐Related Quality of Life in the United States," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 768-777, June.
    11. Julie Ratcliffe & Elisabeth Huynh & Katherine Stevens & John Brazier & Michael Sawyer & Terry Flynn, 2016. "Nothing About Us Without Us? A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Health‐State Values for the Child Health Utility‐9D Using Profile Case Best–Worst Scaling," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(4), pages 486-496, April.
    12. Alastair Canaway & Emma Frew & Emma Lancashire & Miranda Pallan & Karla Hemming & Peymane Adab & on behalf of the WAVES trial investigators, 2019. "Economic evaluation of a childhood obesity prevention programme for children: Results from the WAVES cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in schools," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Russell Jago & Byron Tibbitts & Emily Sanderson & Emma L. Bird & Alice Porter & Chris Metcalfe & Jane E. Powell & Darren Gillett & Simon J. Sebire, 2019. "Action 3:30R: Results of a Cluster Randomised Feasibility Study of a Revised Teaching Assistant-Led Extracurricular Physical Activity Intervention for 8 to 10 Year Olds," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic evaluation; Cost-effectiveness; Atopic eczema; Atopic dermatitis; Online interventions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-023-01649-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.