IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v44y2024i4d10.1007_s10669-024-09973-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutions’ adaptability in reducing vulnerability: a study in the char lands of Assam

Author

Listed:
  • Mrinal Saikia

    (Nowgong College (Autonomous)
    Gauhati University)

  • Ratul Mahanta

    (Gauhati University)

Abstract

Institutions are crucial for shaping society and its values and behaviors, especially in the context of the global environmental crisis. Institutions can play a significant role in enhancing the adaptive capacity of society to climate change, as emphasized by the IPCC reports. Char is a land-form that is highly vulnerable to climate change and related events. Char is a land-form that is highly vulnerable to climate change and related events. According to the Human Development Report (Assam Human Development Report 2014. Government of Assam, 2014), char dwellers are the poorest and the most vulnerable communities in Assam. This paper aims to understand how the institutions of the char areas of Assam, including both formal and informal institutions can foster the adaptive capacity of the communities residing in these vulnerable locations. To achieve this goal, we apply the adaptive capacity wheel (ACW), a widely accepted approach to determine the quality of institutions in the literature of institutional economics. ACW is a normative economic study, based on value judgments, and we interviewed 49 stakeholders of a total of 16 char villages of Assam. Our study reveals the characteristics and challenges of institutions of the char areas in Assam. It emphasizes the fact that about certain dimensions, like the institutions' capacity to generate resources, support modifications to their structure and pattern, improve the ability to learn, and ensure fairness in the governance system, the char institutions of Assam's various regions require extra attention. These areas are crucial for the people’s resilience to severe climate impacts. In addition to identifying regional variations in institutional quality, our research makes recommendations for institutional enhancements aimed at boosting societal adaptability. It is also argued that the study can be extended to other sensitive areas of the world with similar characteristics to char.

Suggested Citation

  • Mrinal Saikia & Ratul Mahanta, 2024. "Institutions’ adaptability in reducing vulnerability: a study in the char lands of Assam," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 810-835, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:44:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10669-024-09973-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-024-09973-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-024-09973-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-024-09973-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corinne Moser & Michael Stauffacher & Yann B. Blumer & Roland W. Scholz, 2015. "From risk to vulnerability: the role of perceived adaptive capacity for the acceptance of contested infrastructure," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 622-636, May.
    2. Hameeda A. AlMalki & Christopher M. Durugbo, 2023. "Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 731-785, June.
    3. Jin Zhao & Ghulam Rasool Madni, 2021. "The impact of economic and political reforms on environmental performance in developing countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Fidelman, Pedro & Van Tuyen, Truong & Nong, Kim & Nursey-Bray, Melissa, 2017. "The institutions-adaptive capacity nexus: Insights from coastal resources co-management in Cambodia and Vietnam," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 103-112.
    5. Jorge Salas & Víctor Yepes, 2020. "Enhancing Sustainability and Resilience through Multi-Level Infrastructure Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Brett A Bryan & Jianjun Huai & Jeff Connor & Lei Gao & Darran King & John Kandulu & Gang Zhao, 2015. "What Actually Confers Adaptive Capacity? Insights from Agro-Climatic Vulnerability of Australian Wheat," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    7. James Ford & Diana King, 2015. "A framework for examining adaptation readiness," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 505-526, April.
    8. Luis Alfonso Dau & Jiatao Li & Marjorie A. Lyles & Aya S. Chacar, 2022. "Informal institutions and the international strategy of MNEs: Effects of institutional effectiveness, convergence, and distance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1257-1281, August.
    9. Jonathan R. Barton, 2013. "Climate Change Adaptive Capacity in Santiago de Chile: Creating a Governance Regime for Sustainability Planning," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1916-1933, November.
    10. Balram Kumar & Debarshi Das, 2019. "Livelihood of the Char Dwellers of Western Assam," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 13(1), pages 90-101, April.
    11. Louis Lebel & Torsten Grothmann & Bernd Siebenhüner, 2010. "The role of social learning in adaptiveness: insights from water management," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 333-353, December.
    12. José Antonio Alonso & Carlos Garcimartin & Virmantas Kvedaras, 2020. "Determinants of institutional quality: an empirical exploration," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 229-247, July.
    13. Jin Zhao & Ghulam Rasool Madni & Muhammad Awais Anwar & Syeda Masooma Zahra, 2021. "Institutional Reforms and Their Impact on Economic Growth and Investment in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    14. Maxim Voronov & Klaus Weber, 2020. "People, Actors, and the Humanizing of Institutional Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 873-884, June.
    15. Ghulam Rasool Madni, 2019. "Probing Institutional Quality Through Ethnic Diversity, Income Inequality and Public Spending," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 581-595, April.
    16. Ahmed, Zobaer & Guha, Gauri S. & Shew, Aaron M. & Alam, G.M. Monirul, 2021. "Climate change risk perceptions and agricultural adaptation strategies in vulnerable riverine char islands of Bangladesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie L. Barr & Christopher J. Lemieux, 2021. "Assessing organizational readiness to adapt to climate change in a regional protected areas context: lessons learned from Canada," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Hyun Kim & David W. Marcouiller & Kyle Maurice Woosnam, 2021. "Multilevel Climate Governance, Anticipatory Adaptation, and the Vulnerability‐Readiness Nexus," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(2), pages 222-242, March.
    3. Juita-Elena (Wie) Yusuf & Burton St. John & Pragati Rawat & Michelle Covi & Janet Gail Nicula & Carol Considine, 2019. "The Action-oriented Stakeholder Engagement for a Resilient Tomorrow (ASERT) framework: an effective, field-tested approach for engaging stakeholders," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 409-418, December.
    4. D. Santillán & L. Garrote & A. Iglesias & V. Sotes, 2020. "Climate change risks and adaptation: new indicators for Mediterranean viticulture," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 881-899, May.
    5. Ichaou Mounirou, 2022. "Do climatic factors induce rural migration? Empirical evidence from cotton farmers in Benin," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(4), pages 393-409, November.
    6. Ella Furness & Harry Nelson, 2016. "Are human values and community participation key to climate adaptation? The case of community forest organisations in British Columbia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 243-259, March.
    7. Maxim Voronov & Mary Ann Glynn & Klaus Weber, 2022. "Under the Radar: Institutional Drift and Non‐Strategic Institutional Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 819-842, May.
    8. Jianjun Huai, 2016. "Role of Livelihood Capital in Reducing Climatic Vulnerability: Insights of Australian Wheat from 1990–2010," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Dirk Heinrichs & Kerstin Krellenberg & Michail Fragkias, 2013. "Urban Responses to Climate Change: Theories and Governance Practice in Cities of the Global South," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1865-1878, November.
    10. Hak Yeung & Jürgen Huber, 2022. "Further Evidence on China’s B&R Impact on Host Countries’ Quality of Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Koirala, Pankaj & Kotani, Koji & Managi, Shunsuke, 2022. "How do farm size and perceptions matter for farmers’ adaptation responses to climate change in a developing country? Evidence from Nepal," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 188-204.
    12. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    13. Valentina Costa & Federico Campanini, 2024. "Community-Centred Energy Planning: Within and beyond Administrative Borders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, March.
    14. Calvo-Mendieta, Iratxe & Petit, Olivier & Vivien, Franck-Dominique, 2017. "Common Patrimony: A Concept to Analyze Collective Natural Resource Management. The Case of Water Management in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 126-132.
    15. Heidi K. Edmonds & C. A. Knox Lovell & Julie E. Lovell, 2022. "The Inequities of National Adaptation to Climate Change," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    16. Alex Bitektine & Patrick Haack & Joel Bothello & Johanna Mair, 2020. "Inhabited Actors: Internalizing Institutions through Communication and Actorhood Models," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 885-897, June.
    17. Chong Wang & Peter W Cardon & Jing Liu & Ghulam Rasool Madni, 2020. "Social and economic factors responsible for environmental performance: A global analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, August.
    18. Dana Salpina & Francesco Pagliacci, 2022. "Are We Adapting to Climate Change? Evidence from the High-Quality Agri-Food Sector in the Veneto Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Naho Mirumachi & Margot Hurlbert, 2022. "Reflecting on twenty years of international agreements concerning water governance: insights and key learning," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 317-332, June.
    20. Sarah Feron & Raúl R. Cordero & Fernando Labbe, 2017. "Rural Electrification Efforts Based on Off-Grid Photovoltaic Systems in the Andean Region: Comparative Assessment of Their Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-23, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:44:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10669-024-09973-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.