IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v35y2015i3d10.1007_s10669-015-9536-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of a territorial soft system approach for conceptual modeling of an agroecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-François Guay

    (Direction régionale de la Chaudière-Appalache)

  • Jean-Philippe Waaub

    (Université du Québec à Montréal)

Abstract

In the province of Québec in Canada, in accordance with the Land Use Planning and Development Act of 1987, every regional county municipality must maintain in force, at all times, an RCM plan applicable to its whole territory. An RCM plan must, regarding the territory of a regional county municipality, determine the general aims of land development policy for the region and identify the public policies on land use of the territory for the different parts of it. Along with the baseline information and the interlinking of the environmental components of the territory, one of the most significant operations involved in planning is the identification of best scenarios or options that involve, very early in the process, conceptualization and formalization of the system under study. However, in accordance with the systemic nature of this problem, several methodological questions have to be addressed before entering the procedure. Among these, how does one gather intelligence on a complex geographical system in an integrated and systematic approach? How can we formalize environmental, social and political interactions and feedback running within these complex systems? How can we point out the fundamental challenges of these interactions? For the specialist in regional planning, these questions can be difficult to manage in an operational context, mainly because of efficiency reasons. The main objectives of this contribution are to show the relevance of an adapted soft system methodology to gather intelligence on the overall functioning and structure of a geographical system at the subregional level scale. The case study is part of a wider academic research project. Thus, the participative process, very particular to Checkland’s SSM, has been partially simulated for the purpose of our demonstration, as we postulated that the stakeholders shared the same views about the problem. In that, we saw the SSM as an adaptable methodology, and with the problems experienced individually by regional planners, we add some of our ideas to the method as we adapted it to this particular context.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-François Guay & Jean-Philippe Waaub, 2015. "Application of a territorial soft system approach for conceptual modeling of an agroecosystem," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 363-374, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:35:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-015-9536-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-015-9536-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-015-9536-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-015-9536-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bev Wilson & Arnab Chakraborty, 2013. "The Environmental Impacts of Sprawl: Emergent Themes from the Past Decade of Planning Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-26, August.
    2. T. Hopkins & Denis Bailly & R. Elmgren & Gillian Glegg & Audun Sandberg & Josianne G. Stottrup, 2012. "A Systems Approach Framework for the Transition to Sustainable Development: Potential Value Based on Coastal Experiments," Post-Print hal-00816077, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tanh T. N. Nguyen & Daniel G. Scognamillo & Christopher E. Comer, 2019. "Revealing Community Perceptions for Ecological Restoration Using a Soft System Methodology," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 429-442, August.
    2. Payam Hanafizadeh & Mohammad Mehrabioun, 2018. "Application of SSM in tackling problematical situations from academicians’ viewpoints," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 179-220, April.
    3. Z. A. Collier & J. H. Lambert & I. Linkov, 2015. "Editorial," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 315-316, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zambon, Ilaria & Serra, Pere & Grigoriadis, Efstathios & Carlucci, Margherita & Salvati, Luca, 2017. "Emerging urban centrality: An entropy-based indicator of polycentric development and economic growth," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 365-371.
    2. Luca Salvati & Ilaria Tombolini & Achille Ippolito & Margherita Carlucci, 2018. "Land quality and the city: Monitoring urban growth and land take in 76 Southern European metropolitan areas," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(4), pages 691-712, July.
    3. Alessandro Venerandi & Hal Mellen & Ombretta Romice & Sergio Porta, 2024. "Walkability Indices—The State of the Art and Future Directions: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Reis, Jeanette, 2014. "Introduction to systems approaches in coastal management—The legacy of the SPICOSA project," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-2.
    5. Chester Arnold & Emily Wilson & James Hurd & Daniel Civco, 2020. "30 Years of Land Cover Change in Connecticut, USA: A Case Study of Long-Term Research, Dissemination of Results, and Their Use in Land Use Planning and Natural Resource Conservation," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Robert H W Boyer, 2015. "Grassroots Innovation for Urban Sustainability: Comparing the Diffusion Pathways of Three Ecovillage Projects," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(2), pages 320-337, February.
    7. Mörtberg, Ulla & Goldenberg, Romain & Kalantari, Zahra & Kordas, Olga & Deal, Brian & Balfors, Berit & Cvetkovic, Vladimir, 2017. "Integrating ecosystem services in the assessment of urban energy trajectories – A study of the Stockholm Region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 338-349.
    8. Cartone, Alfredo & Díaz-Dapena, Alberto & Langarita, Raquel & Rubiera-Morollón, Fernando, 2021. "Where the city lights shine? Measuring the effect of sprawl on electricity consumption in Spain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Radu-Matei Cocheci & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor, 2023. "Assessing the Negative Effects of Suburbanization: The Urban Sprawl Restrictiveness Index in Romania’s Metropolitan Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Gianni Guastella & Walid Oueslati & Stefano Pareglio, 2019. "Patterns of Urban Spatial Expansion in European Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Jacopo Klaus, 2020. "Do municipal autonomy and institutional fragmentation stand in the way of antisprawl policies? A qualitative comparative analysis of Swiss cantons," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(9), pages 1622-1638, November.
    12. Eric Gielen & Gabriel Riutort-Mayol & José Sergio Palencia-Jiménez & Isidro Cantarino, 2018. "An urban sprawl index based on multivariate and Bayesian factor analysis with application at the municipality level in Valencia," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(5), pages 888-914, September.
    13. Chaopeng Li & Guoyin Cai & Zhongchang Sun, 2021. "Urban Land-Use Efficiency Analysis by Integrating LCRPGR and Additional Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Qixuan Li & Ying Xu & Xu Yang & Ke Chen, 2023. "Unveiling the Regional Differences and Convergence of Urban Sprawl in China, 2006–2019," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Zhonghua Cheng & Xiaowen Hu, 2023. "The effects of urbanization and urban sprawl on CO2 emissions in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1792-1808, February.
    16. Shiqin Liu & Carl Higgs & Jonathan Arundel & Geoff Boeing & Nicholas Cerdera & David Moctezuma & Ester Cerin & Deepti Adlakha & Melanie Lowe & Billie Giles-Corti, 2021. "A Generalized Framework for Measuring Pedestrian Accessibility around the World Using Open Data," Papers 2105.08814, arXiv.org.
    17. József Lennert & Jenő Zsolt Farkas & András Donát Kovács & András Molnár & Rita Módos & Dorián Baka & Zoltán Kovács, 2020. "Measuring and Predicting Long-Term Land Cover Changes in the Functional Urban Area of Budapest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Benedetto Manganelli & Beniamino Murgante & Lucia Saganeiti, 2020. "The Social Cost of Urban Sprinkling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Donalda Karnauskaitė & Gerald Schernewski & Josianne G. Støttrup & Marija Kataržytė, 2019. "Indicator-Based Sustainability Assessment Tool to Support Coastal and Marine Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, June.
    20. Emilia Janeczko & Radosław Dąbrowski & Joanna Budnicka-Kosior & Małgorzata Woźnicka, 2019. "Influence of Urbanization Processes on the Dynamics and Scale of Spatial Transformations in the Mazowiecki Landscape Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:35:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-015-9536-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.