IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i10d10.1007_s10668-023-03735-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-generation system based on geothermal driven: energy, exergy, economic and exergoenvironmental (4E) analysis for combined power, freshwater, hydrogen, oxygen, and heating production

Author

Listed:
  • Hassan Hajabdollahi

    (Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan)

  • Amin Saleh

    (Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan)

  • Mohammad Shafiey Dehaj

    (Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan)

Abstract

Renewable energy is one of environmentally friendly strategies to reduce the environmental pollution caused by energy generation from fossil fuels and reach sustainable development. In this current study, a geothermal driven multi-generation system to provide power, heating, freshwater, hydrogen and oxygen demands is investigated. The main components are encompassed single-pressure organic Rankine cycle, reverse osmosis desalination unit, domestic water heater and proton exchange membrane electrolyzer. For this purpose, energy, exergy, economic and exergoenvironmental (4E) evaluations are accomplished upon proposed system. Non-dominant sorting genetic algorithm has been considered as optimization method that leads to reveal the maximum and minimum of exergy efficiency and total annual cost (TAC) rate as two objective functions. In addition, sensitivity analysis is performed to reveal the roles of design parameters on the system performance and productivity from different standpoints. The optimal results showed that exergy efficiency and TAC increased, as operating temperature of PEM electrolyzer enhances. In terms of economic analysis, the most percentage of total investment cost is pertained to RO unit which was 58.05%. In addition, exergy efficiency and TAC of the proposed system were 30.42% and 255.96 $/h, respectively. As well, the mass flow rate of freshwater, hydrogen, oxygen, net power output and heating production were obtained 3146.7 m3/day, 0.42 m3/day, 3.35 m3/day, 1556.2 kW and 18,586 kW, respectively. Furthermore, by taking into account exergoenvironmental analysis, the environmental impact rate of power, heating, freshwater and hydrogen–oxygen production 2.331 × 10−5 pts/kJh, 3.668 × 10−3 pts/kJh, 1.45 pts/m3h and 11.42 pts/kgh, respectively. Eventually, the optimal outcomes from various perspectives were compared and argued.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassan Hajabdollahi & Amin Saleh & Mohammad Shafiey Dehaj, 2024. "A multi-generation system based on geothermal driven: energy, exergy, economic and exergoenvironmental (4E) analysis for combined power, freshwater, hydrogen, oxygen, and heating production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26415-26447, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03735-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03735-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03735-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03735-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    2. Blanco-Marigorta, Ana M. & Masi, Marco & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2014. "Exergo-environmental analysis of a reverse osmosis desalination plant in Gran Canaria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 223-232.
    3. Sina Abbasi & Babek Erdebilli, 2023. "Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks’ Response to Various Carbon Policies during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    4. Fragiacomo, Petronilla & Lucarelli, Giuseppe & Genovese, Matteo & Florio, Gaetano, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization model for fuel cell-based poly-generation energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Usama Awan & Robert Sroufe & Karoly Bozan, 2022. "Designing Value Chains for Industry 4.0 and a Circular Economy: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Bonamico, Eleonora, 2017. "Design guidelines for the choice between single and dual pressure layouts in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 413-431.
    7. Rašković, Predrag & Guzović, Zvonimir & Cvetković, Svetislav, 2013. "Performance analysis of electricity generation by the medium temperature geothermal resources: Velika Ciglena case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-31.
    8. Boyaghchi, Fateme Ahmadi & Chavoshi, Mansoure & Sabeti, Vajiheh, 2018. "Multi-generation system incorporated with PEM electrolyzer and dual ORC based on biomass gasification waste heat recovery: Exergetic, economic and environmental impact optimizations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 38-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    2. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    3. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    4. Rech, Sergio & Zandarin, Simone & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Frangopoulos, Christos A., 2017. "Design and off-design models of single and two-stage ORC systems on board a LNG carrier for the search of the optimal performance and control strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 221-241.
    5. Xinglin Yang & Qiang Lei & Junhu Zou & Xiaohui Lu & Zhenzhen Chen, 2023. "Green and Efficient Recovery and Optimization of Waste Heat and LNG Cold Energy in LNG-Powered Ship Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-32, December.
    6. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Toffolo, Andrea, 2018. "SYNTHSEP: A general methodology for the synthesis of energy system configurations beyond superstructures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 924-949.
    7. Wang, Zengli & Shao, Hua & Shao, Mingcheng & Dai, Zeyu & Zhang, Rao, 2024. "Thermodynamic analysis of a coupled system based on total flow cycle and partially evaporated organic Rankine cycle for hot dry rock utilization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    8. Li, Jian & Yang, Zhen & Shen, Jun & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2023. "Enhancement effects of adding internal heat exchanger on dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    9. Liu, Xiaoliang & Ma, Lianghua & Liu, Haoyang & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2024. "Assessment of a sustainable power generation system utilizing supercritical carbon dioxide working fluid: Thermodynamic, economic, and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    10. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Grispos, Victoras & Karellas, Sotirios, 2021. "Exergetic efficiency potential of double-stage ORCs with zeotropic mixtures of natural hydrocarbons and CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    11. Li, Jian & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Yang, Fubin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Thermo-economic analyses and evaluations of small-scale dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle system using pure fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    12. Hoang, Anh Tuan, 2018. "Waste heat recovery from diesel engines based on Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 138-166.
    13. Lee, Inkyu & Tester, Jefferson William & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-577.
    14. Qaisar Ali & Sulistya Rusgianto & Shazia Parveen & Hakimah Yaacob & Razali Mat Zin, 2024. "An empirical study of the effects of green Sukuk spur on economic growth, social development, and financial performance in Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21097-21123, August.
    15. Ghavami, Morteza & Gholizadeh, Mohammad & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi, 2023. "Parametric study and optimization analysis of a multi-generation system using waste heat in natural gas refinery- an energy and exergoeconomic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    16. Li, Jiaojiao & Zoghi, Mohammad & Zhao, Linfeng, 2022. "Thermo-economic assessment and optimization of a geothermal-driven tri-generation system for power, cooling, and hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    17. Ebrahimi-Moghadam, Amir & Farzaneh-Gord, Mahmood, 2022. "Optimal operation of a multi-generation district energy hub based on electrical, heating, and cooling demands and hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    18. Yan Shen & Tian Gao & Zizhao Song & Ji Ma, 2023. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision-Making and Coordination Considering Fairness Concerns under Carbon Neutral Rewards and Punishments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, April.
    19. Dou, Zhenhai & Zou, Yunhe & Mohebbi, Amir, 2024. "Design and multi-aspect analysis of a geothermal and biomass dual-source power, cooling, heating, and hybrid freshwater production system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    20. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03735-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.