IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i6d10.1007_s10668-021-01793-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relational pre-impact assessment of conventional housing features and carbon footprint for achieving sustainable built environment

Author

Listed:
  • Syed Shujaa Safdar Gardezi

    (Capital University of Science and Technology (CUST))

  • Nasir Shafiq

    (Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS)

  • Muhammad Waris Ali Khan

    (University Malaysia Pahang (UMP))

Abstract

Sustainable comfortable living requires comprehensive energy consumption planning for the housing habitat. Besides other energy planning considerations, the variations in physical features of built facilities, their environmental interaction, and resulting operational life cycle carbon footprint are an important focus in contemporary research. Therefore, this research aims to explore the relationship between the physical features of the built facility and the resulting carbon footprint for conventional housing designs. A combination of conventional Malaysian model housing units was developed in 3D virtual prototypes by building information modeling, and regression analysis was used to investigate the environmental impact paradigm of the built facility. Correspondingly, an operational CO2 pre-assessment was also examined by the partial life cycle assessment technique during the early stages of design and planning. The results of this study show a positive and statistically significant linear relation of carbon footprint with the area, volume, and power rating parameters. The outcome of this study is imperative for designing resource-efficient living facilities and achieving a sustainable built environment through a proactive life cycle assessment of housing construction projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Syed Shujaa Safdar Gardezi & Nasir Shafiq & Muhammad Waris Ali Khan, 2022. "Relational pre-impact assessment of conventional housing features and carbon footprint for achieving sustainable built environment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8441-8463, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01793-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01793-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01793-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01793-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Huanan & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2015. "Is it possible for China to reduce its total CO2 emissions?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 438-446.
    2. Maria Rosa Trovato & Francesco Nocera & Salvatore Giuffrida, 2020. "Life-Cycle Assessment and Monetary Measurements for the Carbon Footprint Reduction of Public Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif & Sathre, Roger, 2010. "Life cycle primary energy implication of retrofitting a wood-framed apartment building to passive house standard," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1152-1160.
    4. Roh, Seungjun & Tae, Sungho & Shin, Sungwoo, 2014. "Development of building materials embodied greenhouse gases assessment criteria and system (BEGAS) in the newly revised Korea Green Building Certification System (G-SEED)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 410-421.
    5. Chau, C.K. & Hui, W.K. & Ng, W.Y. & Powell, G., 2012. "Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in high-rise concrete office buildings using different material use options," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 22-34.
    6. Rauf, Abdul & Crawford, Robert H., 2015. "Building service life and its effect on the life cycle embodied energy of buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 140-148.
    7. Huang, Tao & Shi, Feng & Tanikawa, Hiroki & Fei, Jinling & Han, Ji, 2013. "Materials demand and environmental impact of buildings construction and demolition in China based on dynamic material flow analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 91-101.
    8. Kim, Sang-Chul & Shin, Hyun-Ik & Ahn, Jonghoon, 2020. "Energy performance analysis of airport terminal buildings by use of architectural, operational information and benchmark metrics," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fahlstedt, Oskar & Rasmussen, Freja Nygaard & Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka & Huang, Lizhen & Bohne, Rolf André, 2024. "Building renovations and life cycle assessment - A scoping literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Roh, Seungjun & Tae, Sungho & Suk, Sung Joon & Ford, George, 2017. "Evaluating the embodied environmental impacts of major building tasks and materials of apartment buildings in Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 135-144.
    3. Xie, Rui & Wang, Fangfang & Chevallier, Julien & Zhu, Bangzhu & Zhao, Guomei, 2018. "Supply-side structural effects of air pollutant emissions in China: A comparative analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 89-95.
    4. Chau, C.K. & Xu, J.M. & Leung, T.M. & Ng, W.Y., 2017. "Evaluation of the impacts of end-of-life management strategies for deconstruction of a high-rise concrete framed office building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1595-1603.
    5. Li, Wei & Sun, Wen & Li, Guomin & Cui, Pengfei & Wu, Wen & Jin, Baihui, 2017. "Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of carbon intensity in China's construction industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 162-173.
    6. Linda Giresini & Claudia Casapulla & Pietro Croce, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Impact of Retrofitting Techniques to Prevent Out-of-Plane Failure Modes of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Seungjun Roh & Sungho Tae & Rakhyun Kim, 2018. "Analysis of Embodied Environmental Impacts of Korean Apartment Buildings Considering Major Building Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Zura Kakushadze, 2015. "A Spectral Model of Turnover Reduction," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Jonghoon Ahn, 2020. "Improvement of the Performance Balance between Thermal Comfort and Energy Use for a Building Space in the Mid-Spring Season," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Kylili, Angeliki & Ilic, Milos & Fokaides, Paris A., 2017. "Whole-building Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a passive house of the sub-tropical climatic zone," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 169-177.
    11. Tae Hyoung Kim & Chang U Chae & Gil Hwan Kim & Hyoung Jae Jang, 2016. "Analysis of CO 2 Emission Characteristics of Concrete Used at Construction Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Vefago, Luiz H. Maccarini & Avellaneda, Jaume, 2013. "Recycling concepts and the index of recyclability for building materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 127-135.
    13. Berardi, Umberto, 2017. "A cross-country comparison of the building energy consumptions and their trends," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 230-241.
    14. Eleftheriadis, Stathis & Mumovic, Dejan & Greening, Paul, 2017. "Life cycle energy efficiency in building structures: A review of current developments and future outlooks based on BIM capabilities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 811-825.
    15. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Sustainability of Wood-Based Constructions’ Use from the Perspective of Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Michele La Noce & Alessandro Lo Faro & Gaetano Sciuto, 2021. "Clay-Based Products Sustainable Development: Some Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.
    17. Yuan Chen & Stephanie Gallardo, 2023. "A Multi-Objective Optimization Method for the Design of a Sustainable House in Ecuador by Assessing LCC and LCEI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Maurizio Detommaso & Antonio Gagliano & Luigi Marletta & Francesco Nocera, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Greening and Cooling Strategies for Thermal Comfort at Pedestrian Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Yi Bao & Zhou Huang & Han Wang & Ganmin Yin & Xiao Zhou & Yong Gao, 2023. "High‐resolution quantification of building stock using multi‐source remote sensing imagery and deep learning," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 350-361, February.
    20. Maria Rosa Trovato, 2020. "Human Capital Approach in the Economic Assessment of Interventions for the Reduction of Seismic Vulnerability in Historic Centres," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-33, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01793-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.