IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i3d10.1007_s10668-021-01562-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of national park tourism sites: a perceptual analysis from residents of three spatial levels of local communities in Banff national park

Author

Listed:
  • Fangbing Hu

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Zhongjun Wang

    (University of British Columbia
    Beijing Forestry University)

  • Gonghan Sheng

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Xia Lia

    (University of British Columbia
    Fujian Forestry Vocational and Technical College)

  • Can Chen

    (University of British Columbia
    Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University)

  • Dehui Geng

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Xinchen Hong

    (University of British Columbia
    Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University)

  • Nuo Xu

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Zhipeng Zhu

    (University of British Columbia
    Fujian University of Technology)

  • Zuofang Zhang

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Liying Zhu

    (Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University)

  • Guangyu Wang

    (University of British Columbia)

Abstract

Communities next to national parks, known as gateway communities, can benefit from national park development. Gateway communities are unique and limited in the degree to which, and direction in which, they can be developed. In this research, Banff National Park was used as a case study to explore residents' perceptions of the impact of national park tourism via a survey questionnaire distributed in communities at three different spatial levels (core, intermediate, and remote portal). The data analyses were based on a sample of 231 respondents and were processed using factor analysis and linear regression models for different communities. The results identified six impact factors, and the differences in each community were analyzed. The findings indicated that residents' perceptions of the impacts of tourism in the town of Canmore rank first, followed by those of Banff and Golden. The regression analysis revealed that Banff was found to have the most supportive residents, and their support for tourism was found to be significantly affected by community natural environmental factors and cultural development factors. Canmore residents were mainly affected by cultural factors. Golden residents were least supportive due to through natural environmental factors and quality of life factors. An adaptive analysis revealed that Banff has the closest economic relationship with national park tourism, and Golden the weakest. Balancing the positive and negative impacts of tourism, exploring more cultural service functions of the communities, seeking a more diverse industrial structure, planning year-round tourism, and cooperating with other communities to ensure local benefits are recommended. The findings may provide an additional understanding of the local perceptions of tourism impacts and local support from a spatial perspective and can help sustainable tourism management by assisting communities to optimize the tourism industry structure and local management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Fangbing Hu & Zhongjun Wang & Gonghan Sheng & Xia Lia & Can Chen & Dehui Geng & Xinchen Hong & Nuo Xu & Zhipeng Zhu & Zuofang Zhang & Liying Zhu & Guangyu Wang, 2022. "Impacts of national park tourism sites: a perceptual analysis from residents of three spatial levels of local communities in Banff national park," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3126-3145, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01562-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01562-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01562-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01562-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ezebilo, Eugene E. & Mattsson, Leif, 2010. "Socio-economic benefits of protected areas as perceived by local people around Cross River National Park, Nigeria," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 189-193, March.
    2. Jennifer Strickland-Munro & Susan Moore & Stefanie Freitag-Ronaldson, 2010. "The impacts of tourism on two communities adjacent to the Kruger National Park, South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 663-678.
    3. Leah Joyner & N. Qwynne Lackey & Kelly S. Bricker, 2019. "Community Engagement: An Appreciative Inquiry Case Study with Theodore Roosevelt National Park Gateway Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Frauman, Eric & Banks, Sarah, 2011. "Gateway community resident perceptions of tourism development: Incorporating Importance-Performance Analysis into a Limits of Acceptable Change framework," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 128-140.
    5. Sharpley, Richard, 2014. "Host perceptions of tourism: A review of the research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 37-49.
    6. Deery, Margaret & Jago, Leo & Fredline, Liz, 2012. "Rethinking social impacts of tourism research: A new research agenda," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 64-73.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao Luo & Zijing Zhang & Xinchen Hong & Yanyun Wang & Xuewei Zhang, 2022. "Evaluating Spatial Identity Based on Climate Adaptation in Small Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Sanja Obradović & Aleksandra Tešin, 2023. "Local Communities’ Perceptions of Tourism Planning in Natural Areas," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suess, Courtney & Mody, Makarand, 2016. "Gaming can be sustainable too! Using Social Representation Theory to examine the moderating effects of tourism diversification on residents' tax paying behavior," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 20-39.
    2. Chen, Xiaoqing & Zhang, Carol Xiaoyue & Stone, Timothy & Lamb, John, 2020. "Existentially understanding tourism in locale: A dwelling perspective," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Rasoolimanesh, S. Mostafa & Ringle, Christian M. & Jaafar, Mastura & Ramayah, T., 2017. "Urban vs. rural destinations: Residents’ perceptions, community participation and support for tourism development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 147-158.
    4. Bimonte, Salvatore & Faralla, Valeria, 2016. "Does residents' perceived life satisfaction vary with tourist season? A two-step survey in a Mediterranean destination," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 199-208.
    5. Hjalager, Anne-Mette, 2020. "Land-use conflicts in coastal tourism and the quest for governance innovations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Almeida-García, Fernando & Peláez-Fernández, María Ángeles & Balbuena-Vázquez, Antonia & Cortés-Macias, Rafael, 2016. "Residents' perceptions of tourism development in Benalmádena (Spain)," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 259-274.
    7. Rasoolimanesh, S. Mostafa & Jaafar, Mastura & Ahmad, A. Ghafar & Barghi, Rabeeh, 2017. "Community participation in World Heritage Site conservation and tourism development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 142-153.
    8. Ivlevs, Artjoms, 2016. "Happy Hosts? International Tourist Arrivals and Residents' Subjective Well-being in Europe," IZA Discussion Papers 10087, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Tomas Gorner & Klara Najmanova & Martin Cihar, 2012. "Changes in Local People’s Perceptions of the Sumava National Park in the Czech Republic over a Ten Year Period (1998–2008)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Gianna Moscardo, 2021. "Using Systems Thinking to Improve Tourism and Hospitality Research Quality and Relevance: A Critical Review and Conceptual Analysis," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Daisy XF Fan & Anyu Liu & Richard TR Qiu, 2019. "Revisiting the relationship between host attitudes and tourism development: A utility maximization approach," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(2), pages 171-188, March.
    12. María Ángeles Plaza-Mejía & Nuria Porras-Bueno & David Flores-Ruiz, 2020. "The Jungle of Support: What Do We Really Mean When We Say “Residents’ Support”?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    13. Selvina Aliyeva & Xi Chen & Degang Yang & Kanat Samarkhanov & Ordenbek Mazbayev & Aday Sekenuly & Gulnura Issanova & Sadyrbek Kozhokulov, 2019. "The Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism in East Kazakhstan Region: Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Koseoglu, Mehmet Ali & Rahimi, Roya & Okumus, Fevzi & Liu, Jingyan, 2016. "Bibliometric studies in tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 180-198.
    15. Yuting An & Jang-Won Moon & William C. Norman, 2021. "Investigating Residents’ Attitudes towards Tourism Growth in Downtown Greenville, SC: The Effect of Demographic Variables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    16. José María Martín Martín & Jose Manuel Guaita Martínez & José Antonio Salinas Fernández, 2018. "An Analysis of the Factors behind the Citizen’s Attitude of Rejection towards Tourism in a Context of Overtourism and Economic Dependence on This Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Xiaoping Gu & Carter A. Hunt & Michael L. Lengieza & Lijun Niu & Huiwen Wu & Yue Wang & Xiang Jia, 2020. "Evaluating Residents’ Perceptions of Nature-Based Tourism with a Factor-Cluster Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Leask, Anna, 2016. "Visitor attraction management: A critical review of research 2009–2014," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 334-361.
    19. Chen, Fangying & Tian, Lichao, 2015. "Comparative study on residents' perceptions of follow-up impacts of the 2008 Olympics," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 263-281.
    20. Zhang, J.J. & Kwong, Y.M., 2017. "Reconceptualising host-guest relations at border towns," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 196-199.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01562-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.