IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v23y2021i9d10.1007_s10668-020-01190-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The motivation and development impact of energy saving to sustainability in the construction of green campus: a case study of the Zhejiang University, China

Author

Listed:
  • Bifeng Zhu

    (Zhijiang College of Zhejiang University of Technology
    Kitakyushu University)

  • Zhekai Wang

    (Zhijiang College of Zhejiang University of Technology)

  • Chaoyang Sun

    (Zhijiang College of Zhejiang University of Technology)

  • Bart Dewancker

    (Kitakyushu University)

Abstract

The construction of green campus is related to the global sustainable development. Under the guidance of campus energy-saving policy, China’s green campus mainly focuses on campus’ energy saving. In contrast, the green campus in the USA pays more attention to environmental problems. This study focuses on the impact of “energy saving” on the sustainable development of green campus. On the one hand, it puts forward targeted optimization suggestions for the Chinese universities. On the other hand, it provides the experience reference and new development ideas for the global campus sustainability. Based on the characteristics of the development mode of green campus in China and the USA, this paper studies the motivation of “energy saving” to “sustainability” in the construction of green campus in China. In terms of research methods, this paper selects Zhejiang University a typical representative of China’s green campus that combined with the comparative group of four American universities and conducts a quantitative analysis of G-value and S-value that represented energy consumption and sustainability, respectively. Zhejiang University’s G-value (0.019) in 2016 is one-sixth of that of the comparative group in the same period, indicating that the implementation effect of the energy-saving monitoring platform is remarkable. From 2014 to 2017, the G-values are basically stable at 0.02, indicating that its future development potential is insufficient. Zhejiang University’s scores in the four categories of S-value are significantly lower than those in the comparative group, showing that there are great differences in the construction achievements of the five universities. According to the score rate of 17 sub-items of S-value, the five universities have different advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, the green campus construction of China’s case university is too one-sided and only stays at the level of energy conservation. The diversification of construction and the balanced development of all aspects should be paid more attention in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Bifeng Zhu & Zhekai Wang & Chaoyang Sun & Bart Dewancker, 2021. "The motivation and development impact of energy saving to sustainability in the construction of green campus: a case study of the Zhejiang University, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 14068-14089, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-020-01190-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-01190-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-020-01190-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-020-01190-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoon Jung Choi & Minjung Oh & Jihye Kang & Loren Lutzenhiser, 2017. "Plans and Living Practices for the Green Campus of Portland State University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guorui Chen & Li Cheng & Foyuan Li, 2022. "Integrating Sustainability and Users’ Demands in the Retrofit of a University Campus in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Ming Zhang & XueJiao Wei & Aidi Xu, 2023. "Impact of investment in quality language education on green economic growth: case study of 23 Chinese provinces," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Bifeng Zhu & Manqi Ding & Xingwei Xiang & Chaoyang Sun & Xiaoqian Tian & Junfeng Yin, 2023. "Factors driving the implementation of the ‘Local New Year’ policy to prevent COVID-19 in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Bifeng Zhu & Jing Feng & Chaoyang Sun & Zhekai Wang, 2024. "Characteristics and affordability of American universities with a willingness to invest in sustainability," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyoik Choi & Jangwon Suh, 2023. "Fault Detection and Power Loss Assessment for Rooftop Photovoltaics Installed in a University Campus, by Use of UAV-Based Infrared Thermography," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Paula M. Castro & Ana Ares-Pernas & Adriana Dapena, 2020. "Service-Learning Projects in University Degrees Based on Sustainable Development Goals: Proposals and Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-020-01190-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.