IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v22y2020i8d10.1007_s10668-019-00546-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-criteria sustainability assessment approach for energy systems using sustainability triple bottom line attributes and linguistic preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Sepehr Hendiani

    (Iran University of Science and Technology)

  • Ebrahim Sharifi

    (Iran University of Science and Technology)

  • Morteza Bagherpour

    (Iran University of Science and Technology)

  • Seyed Farid Ghannadpour

    (Iran University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Regarding the high level of pollution in energy industries, evaluating the current sustainability level in energy systems in developed/developing countries remains a challenge. A sustainable energy system has to proceed simultaneously social, economic and environmental practices with the goal of enhancing the sustainability level in associated systems. The evaluation of sustainability plays an active role in implementation of short- and long-term sustainability practices. This study proposes a novel framework as a benchmark for evaluations of sustainability in energy systems by introducing sixty-five key attributes and thirteen criteria for three pillars of sustainability. Due to the existence of incomplete information and uncertainty in evaluations of sustainability, the linguistic terms are used for expressing the condition of weight and performance rate for every single attribute based on expert judgment in accordance with fuzzy logic. Triangular fuzzy membership functions are also deployed to assign those linguistic judgments with appropriate fuzzy sets. The outputs of the proposed methodology involve a three-level fuzzy computational approach for obtaining the overall energy system’s sustainability index, using Euclidean distance approach for determination of sustainability level, a sieve algorithm for identifying the obstacles of sustainability using fuzzy performance importance index and finally enhancing the overall sustainability level with optimizing the identified weak points. An illustrative case is also resolved using proposed approach to elucidate the wide application of proposed framework in diverse energy systems/companies. The validation of approach is clarified by crisp calculations. The findings of this study will contribute policymakers and practitioners to take appropriate steps toward improvement of energy corporations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sepehr Hendiani & Ebrahim Sharifi & Morteza Bagherpour & Seyed Farid Ghannadpour, 2020. "A multi-criteria sustainability assessment approach for energy systems using sustainability triple bottom line attributes and linguistic preferences," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7771-7805, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:22:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-019-00546-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-019-00546-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-019-00546-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-019-00546-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Economic vs non-material incentives for participation in an in-kind payments for ecosystem services program in Bolivia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 178-190.
    2. Kostevšek, Anja & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Papa, Gregor & Petek, Janez, 2016. "The concept of an ecosystem model to support the transformation to sustainable energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1460-1469.
    3. Lin, Ching-Torng & Chiu, Hero & Tseng, Yi-Hong, 2006. "Agility evaluation using fuzzy logic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 353-368, June.
    4. Krueger, Alan B., 1990. "Incentive effects of workers' compensation insurance," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 73-99, February.
    5. Gagliardi, Francesco & Roscia, Mariacristina & Lazaroiu, Gheorghe, 2007. "Evaluation of sustainability of a city through fuzzy logic," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 795-802.
    6. Paula Bustos, 2011. "Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(1), pages 304-340, February.
    7. Böckerman, Petri & Ilmakunnas, Pekka & Johansson, Edvard, 2011. "Job security and employee well-being: Evidence from matched survey and register data," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 547-554, August.
    8. Narula, Kapil & Sudhakara Reddy, B. & Pachauri, Shonali & Mahendra Dev, S., 2017. "Sustainable energy security for India: An assessment of the energy supply sub-system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 127-144.
    9. Unknown, 2016. "Energy for Sustainable Development," Conference Proceedings 253270, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    10. Groscurth, H.-M. & Bruckner, Th. & Kümmel, R., 1995. "Modeling of energy-services supply systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 20(9), pages 941-958.
    11. Hong, Jong Ho & Kim, Jitae & Son, Wonik & Shin, Heeyoung & Kim, Nahyun & Lee, Woong Ki & Kim, Jintae, 2019. "Long-term energy strategy scenarios for South Korea: Transition to a sustainable energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 425-437.
    12. Mani, Venkatesh & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Delgado, Catarina, 2018. "Supply chain social sustainability: Standard adoption practices in Portuguese manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 149-164.
    13. Vera, Ivan & Langlois, Lucille, 2007. "Energy indicators for sustainable development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 875-882.
    14. Nie, S. & Huang, Charley Z. & Huang, G.H. & Li, Y.P. & Chen, J.P. & Fan, Y.R. & Cheng, G.H., 2016. "Planning renewable energy in electric power system for sustainable development under uncertainty – A case study of Beijing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 772-786.
    15. Narula, Kapil & Sudhakara Reddy, B. & Pachauri, Shonali, 2017. "Sustainable Energy Security for India: An assessment of energy demand sub-system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P2), pages 126-139.
    16. Moslehi, Salim & Reddy, T. Agami, 2019. "A new quantitative life cycle sustainability assessment framework: Application to integrated energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 482-493.
    17. Joseph Sarkis & Marilyn Michelle Helms & Aref A. Hervani, 2010. "Reverse logistics and social sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(6), pages 337-354, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Zhou & Miao Yu & Shen Tian & Chengju Gong, 2024. "Evaluation of urban environmental sustainability based on the integration of multi-improvement demands: a case study of Liaoning Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 18761-18783, July.
    2. Monireh Jahani Sayyad Noveiri & Sohrab Kordrostami & Alireza Amirteimoori, 2022. "Performance analysis of sustainable supply networks with bounded, discrete, and joint factors," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 238-270, January.
    3. N. Aktaş & N. Demirel, 2021. "A hybrid framework for evaluating corporate sustainability using multi-criteria decision making," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15591-15618, October.
    4. Rivero-Iglesias, Jose M. & Puente, Javier & Fernandez, Isabel & León, Omar, 2023. "Integrated model for the assessment of power generation alternatives through analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy inference system. Case study of Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 563-581.
    5. Selçuk Perçin, 2022. "Circular supplier selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5551-5581, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koray Altintas & Ozalp Vayvay & Sinan Apak & Emine Cobanoglu, 2020. "An Extended GRA Method Integrated with Fuzzy AHP to Construct a Multidimensional Index for Ranking Overall Energy Sustainability Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Fahad Bin Abdullah & Rizwan Iqbal & Sadique Ahmad & Mohammed A. El-Affendi & Maria Abdullah, 2022. "An Empirical Analysis of Sustainable Energy Security for Energy Policy Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, May.
    3. Wang, Deqing & Tian, Sihua & Fang, Lei & Xu, Yan, 2020. "A functional index model for dynamically evaluating China's energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Aleksei V. Bogoviz & Yulia V. Ragulina & Svetlana V. Lobova & Alexander N. Alekseev, 2019. "A quantitative Analysis of Energy Security Performance by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa in 1990-2015," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 244-250.
    5. Debin Fang & Shanshan Shi & Qian Yu, 2018. "Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Security and an Empirical Analysis of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Gill-Wiehl, A. & Ray, I. & Kammen, D., 2021. "Is clean cooking affordable? A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    8. Kirchhoff, Hannes & Strunz, Kai, 2019. "Key drivers for successful development of peer-to-peer microgrids for swarm electrification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 46-62.
    9. Yuan, Mei-Hua & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2020. "Developing indicators for the monitoring of the sustainability of food, energy, and water," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Changyu Zhou & Guohe Huang & Jiapei Chen, 2019. "A Type-2 Fuzzy Chance-Constrained Fractional Integrated Modeling Method for Energy System Management of Uncertainties and Risks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Abbas, Khizar & Li, Shixiang & Xu, Deyi & Baz, Khan & Rakhmetova, Aigerim, 2020. "Do socioeconomic factors determine household multidimensional energy poverty? Empirical evidence from South Asia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    12. Abdullah Yıldızbaşı & Cihat Öztürk & Deniz Efendioğlu & Serol Bulkan, 2021. "Assessing the social sustainable supply chain indicators using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods: a case study of Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4285-4320, March.
    13. Berjawi, A.E.H. & Walker, S.L. & Patsios, C. & Hosseini, S.H.R., 2021. "An evaluation framework for future integrated energy systems: A whole energy systems approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    14. Abdulrasheed Zakari & Jurij Toplak & Luka Martin Tomažič, 2022. "Exploring the Relationship between Energy and Food Security in Africa with Instrumental Variables Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Ifaei, Pouya & Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yang, Rebecca Jing & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "A data-driven analytical roadmap to a sustainable 2030 in South Korea based on optimal renewable microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Matsumoto, Ken’ichi & Shiraki, Hiroto, 2018. "Energy security performance in Japan under different socioeconomic and energy conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 391-401.
    17. Ebrahimi, Mehri & Rahmani, Donya, 2019. "A five-dimensional approach to sustainability for prioritizing energy production systems using a revised GRA method: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 345-354.
    18. Mariana Toussaint & Pablo Cabanelas & Alicia Blanco‐González, 2021. "Social sustainability in the food value chain: An integrative approach beyond corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 103-115, January.
    19. Augutis, Juozas & Krikštolaitis, Ričardas & Martišauskas, Linas & Pečiulytė, Sigita & Žutautaitė, Inga, 2017. "Integrated energy security assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 890-901.
    20. Yupei Du & Wenju Wang & Qian Lu & Ziyang Li, 2020. "A DPSIR-TODIM Model Security Evaluation of China’s Rare Earth Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:22:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-019-00546-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.