IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v22y2020i6d10.1007_s10668-019-00451-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable economic rural development system pattern in Ghaemshahr: an application of the developed TOP-MARD core model

Author

Listed:
  • Komeil Mahjori Karmozdi

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

  • Mohammad Reza Kohansal

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

  • Mohammad Ghorbani

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

Abstract

Attention to rural development is an important and undeniable necessity of regional and national development in any country. As a result, in this study, this issue has been assessed in the villages of Ghaemshahr city of Mazandaran Province in Iran. In this regard, the developed model of TOPMARD Core Model and 382 samples of villagers in Ghaemshahr city have been used. Vensim software has been used to analyze the information. Indicators used in this model include economic, social, environmental, physical, tourism and welfare indicators of villages. Three scenarios of agricultural support, non-agricultural support and environmental education were simulated. The model simulation results for existing conditions indicate that the welfare of villagers is declining over the coming years and the migration process from village to cities are increasing. The results of various policy simulations showed that the implementation of policies to increase the guaranteed price of purchases of agricultural products, increase the input support along with environmental education in order to understand the amount and manner of using fertilizer and pesticide and improvement in infrastructure and physical facilities such as creation, educational, health, cultural and rural infrastructure, including suitable roads for easier and less costly access to the market, as well as the presence of tourists to the villages, can play an important role in improving of the well-being of villagers, reducing poverty gap and reducing migration to the cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Komeil Mahjori Karmozdi & Mohammad Reza Kohansal & Mohammad Ghorbani, 2020. "Sustainable economic rural development system pattern in Ghaemshahr: an application of the developed TOP-MARD core model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5793-5817, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:22:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-019-00451-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-019-00451-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-019-00451-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-019-00451-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, K.M. & Singh, R.K.P. & Jha, A.K. & Kumar, Abhay, 2013. "Fodder Market in Bihar: An Exploratory Study," MPRA Paper 53597, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Apr 2013.
    2. Hashemi, Niloofar & Ghaffary, Gholamreza, 2017. "A Proposed Sustainable Rural Development Index (SRDI): Lessons from Hajij village, Iran," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 130-138.
    3. John H. Miller, 1998. "Active Nonlinear Tests (ANTs) of Complex Simulation Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 820-830, June.
    4. Bryden, John Marshall, 2010. "Using System Dynamics for Holistic Rural Policy Assessments and Data Envelopment Analysis for Evaluation of Comparative Policy Efficiency at Regional level," 118th Seminar, August 25-27, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia 94618, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Johnson, Thomas G. & Bryden, John Marshall & Refsgaard, Karen & Alva Lizarraga, Sara, 2008. "A System Dynamics Model Of Agriculture And Rural Development: The Topmard Core Model," 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain 6497, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Xiaohua Yu, 2018. "Engel curve, farmer welfare and food consumption in 40 years of rural China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 65-77, February.
    7. John Gowdy & Jon D. Erickson, 2005. "The approach of ecological economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 29(2), pages 207-222, March.
    8. Unknown, 2006. "Multifunctional Agriculture And Rural Development," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 53(01).
    9. Sylvester O. Ogutu & Matin Qaim, 2018. "Commercialization of the small farm sector and multidimensional poverty," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 269561, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goddard, Jessica J. & Kallis, Giorgos & Norgaard, Richard B., 2019. "Keeping multiple antennae up: Coevolutionary foundations for methodological pluralism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Miloš Ulman & Pavel Šimek & Jan Masner & Pavel Kogut & Tuula Löytty & Patrick Crehan & Karel Charvát & Antoni Oliva & Stein Runar Bergheim & Milan Kalaš & Denis Kolokol & Tommaso Sabbatini, 2020. "Towards Future Oriented Collaborative Policy Development for Rural Areas and People," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(01), March.
    3. Plumecocq, Gaël, 2014. "The second generation of ecological economics: How far has the apple fallen from the tree?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 457-468.
    4. Jan H. Kwakkel & Erik Pruyt, 2015. "Using System Dynamics for Grand Challenges: The ESDMA Approach," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 358-375, May.
    5. Szabó, Zoltán, 2011. "Reducing protest responses by deliberative monetary valuation: Improving the validity of biodiversity valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 37-44.
    6. Venkatachalam, L., 2008. "Behavioral economics for environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 640-645, November.
    7. Wang, Yahui & Li, Xiubin & He, Huiyan & Xin, Liangjie & Tan, Minghong, 2020. "How reliable are cultivated land assets as social security for Chinese farmers?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Ciprian Ionescu & Hélène Leriche & Michel Trommetter, 2016. "Biodiversité et Économie : nouvelles approches, outils et démarches de gestion et de comptabilité," Working Papers hal-01340214, HAL.
    9. Ferretti, Paola & Zolin, Maria Bruna & Ferraro, Giacomo, 2020. "Relationships among sustainability dimensions: evidence from an Alpine area case study using Dominance-based Rough Set Approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Anderson, Blake & M'Gonigle, Michael, 2012. "Does ecological economics have a future?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 37-48.
    11. Zhou, De & Yu, Xiaohua & Abler, David & Chen, Danhong, 2020. "Projecting meat and cereals demand for China based on a meta-analysis of income elasticities," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Sevilla Jiménez, Martín & Torregrosa, Teresa & Moreno, Luis, 2010. "Un Panorama sobre la Economía del Agua/An Overview on Water Economy," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 28, pages 265-304, Agosto.
    13. Sandra Waddock, 2020. "Reframing and Transforming Economics around Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Michael B. Wironen & Robert V. Bartlett & Jon D. Erickson, 2019. "Deliberation and the Promise of a Deeply Democratic Sustainability Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Armatas, Christopher A. & Borrie, William T., 2025. "A pragmatist ecological economics - Normative foundations and a framework for actionable knowledge," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Han, Xinru & Li, Guojing, 2021. "Shrinking Working-Age Population and Food Demand: Evidence from Rural China," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315000, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Benjamin L. Turner & Hector M. Menendez & Roger Gates & Luis O. Tedeschi & Alberto S. Atzori, 2016. "System Dynamics Modeling for Agricultural and Natural Resource Management Issues: Review of Some Past Cases and Forecasting Future Roles," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Martin Kniepert, 2014. "Die (Neue) Institutionenökonomik als Ansatz für einen erweiterten, offeneren Zugang zur Volkswirtschaftslehre," Working Papers 552014, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    19. Carles Manera & Eloi Serrano, 2022. "Management, Cooperatives and Sustainability: A New Methodological Proposal for a Holistic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Zheng, Hongyun & Ma, Wanglin, 2023. "Impact of agricultural commercialization on dietary diversity and vulnerability to poverty: Insights from Chinese rural households," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 558-569.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    System dynamic; Sustainable economic development; Ghaemshahr villages; Developed TOP-MARD core model; Physical index; Economic welfare of villagers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population
    • R28 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:22:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-019-00451-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.