IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v21y2019i3d10.1007_s10668-018-0096-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermal performance of three improved biomass-fired cookstoves using fuel wood, wood pellets and coconut shell

Author

Listed:
  • Pravin R. Sonarkar

    (Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology)

  • Ashish S. Chaurasia

    (Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology)

Abstract

India produces 500 million metric tones of renewable agricultural biomass every year, primarily used as a cooking fuel. Inefficient combustion of biomass is one of the major hindrances for the effective utilization of this vast reserve of energy. Inefficient combustion may occur due to several factors such as lack of proper air circulation, improper packing of fuel and excess moisture content in the fuel. This paper describes the performance evaluation of three improved stoves; natural draft TLUD stove and forced draft Purti and Mpurti stove using three kinds of biomass fuel as wood chips, wood pellets and coconut shell. It was found that the thermal efficiency of the natural draft TLUD stove was 26–27%, electric fan operated Purti stove was 44–45%, and solar fan operated Mpurti stove was 46–48%. This performance was assessed by the standard laboratory-based water boiling test method (WBT) to get thermal efficiency, burning rate, boiling point, specific fuel consumption and firepower. The economic analysis study was carried out to get an idea about the approximate cost that would be incurred per month on the fuel. All these desirable parameters are maximized for the efficient combustion of fuel. The gaseous components like CO and CO2 obtained over the fuel bed are analyzed using gas chromatography. Particulate matter (PM2.5) was measured by the fine particulate sampler. PM2.5 concentration for traditional cookstoves was much higher than studied forced draft Mpurti (510 ± 45 μg/m3) and Purti stove (677 ± 40 μg/m3). The reduction in the indoor concentration of PM2.5 for Mpurti is about 60–63% as compared to traditional stove. Mean CO emissions on a volumetric basis during the cold start and hot start phase were lowest for Mpurti forced draft stove (2.41%). The study reveals that clean cooking can be achieved using the forced draft Mpurti stove.

Suggested Citation

  • Pravin R. Sonarkar & Ashish S. Chaurasia, 2019. "Thermal performance of three improved biomass-fired cookstoves using fuel wood, wood pellets and coconut shell," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1429-1449, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:21:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-018-0096-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-018-0096-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-018-0096-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-018-0096-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 2016. "Energy for Sustainable Development," Conference Proceedings 253270, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    2. Arora, Pooja & Jain, Suresh, 2016. "A review of chronological development in cookstove assessment methods: Challenges and way forward," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 203-220.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ekaterina A. Syrtsova & Ekaterina D. Ivantsova & Alexandra S. Miskiv & Evgeniya V. Zander & Anton I. Pyzhev, 2024. "Costs of Coal Abatement for Residential Heating to Reduce Urban Air Pollution in Asian Russia: Evidence from Krasnoyarsk," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Nikolaos Savvakis & Stavroula Tournaki & Dimitra Tarasi & Nikos Kallergis & Tryfon Daras & Theocharis Tsoutsos, 2022. "Environmental effects from the use of traditional biomass for heating in rural areas: a case study of Anogeia, Crete," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5473-5495, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yohannes Biru Aemro & Pedro Moura & Aníbal T. Almeida, 2021. "Inefficient cooking systems a challenge for sustainable development: a case of rural areas of Sub-Saharan Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14697-14721, October.
    2. Villanthenkodath, Muhammed Ashiq & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar, 2021. "Does economic growth respond to electricity consumption asymmetrically in Bangladesh? The implication for environmental sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hoang, Thi Hong Van & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 199-212.
    4. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.
    5. Mollik, Sazib & Rashid, M.M. & Hasanuzzaman, M. & Karim, M.E. & Hosenuzzaman, M., 2016. "Prospects, progress, policies, and effects of rural electrification in Bangladesh," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 553-567.
    6. Obsatar Sinaga & Mohd Haizam Mohd Saudi & Djoko Roespinoedji & Mohd Shahril Ahmad Razimi, 2019. "The Dynamic Relationship between Natural Gas and Economic Growth: Evidence from Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 388-394.
    7. Asongu, Simplice A. & Odhiambo, Nicholas M., 2021. "Inequality, finance and renewable energy consumption in Sub-Saharan Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 678-688.
    8. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    9. Teng, Meixuan & Burke, Paul J. & Liao, Hua, 2019. "The demand for coal among China's rural households: Estimates of price and income elasticities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 928-936.
    10. Wan-Lin Yong & Jerome Kueh & Yong Sze Wei & Jang-Haw Tiang, 2020. "Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in China: Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL)," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 194212-1942, December.
    11. Ruqayya Ibraheem & Ismat Nasim, 2021. "Globalization, Energy Use and Environmental Degradation in Thailand," iRASD Journal of Energy and Environment, International Research Association for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 2(1), pages 01-11, June.
    12. Wenxiao Chu & Maria Vicidomini & Francesco Calise & Neven Duić & Poul Alborg Østergaard & Qiuwang Wang & Maria da Graça Carvalho, 2022. "Recent Advances in Low-Carbon and Sustainable, Efficient Technology: Strategies and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, April.
    13. Sadeq Hooshmand Zaferani & Mehdi Jafarian & Daryoosh Vashaee & Reza Ghomashchi, 2021. "Thermal Management Systems and Waste Heat Recycling by Thermoelectric Generators—An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Setterberg, Hanna & Sjöström, Emma, 2021. "Action Lab: Integrated Communications on Financial and ESG Performance in the Earnings Call," Misum Working Paper Series 2021-1, Stockholm School of Economics, Mistra Center for Sustainable Markets (Misum).
    15. Ouyang, Yaofu & Li, Peng, 2018. "On the nexus of financial development, economic growth, and energy consumption in China: New perspective from a GMM panel VAR approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 238-252.
    16. Muhammad Shahbaz & Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad & Mantu Kumar Mahalik & Perry Sadorsky, 2018. "How strong is the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption in developed economies? A country-specific time-series and panel analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(13), pages 1479-1494, March.
    17. Anandkumar Balasubramaniam & Anand Paul & Won-Hwa Hong & HyunCheol Seo & Jeong Hong Kim, 2017. "Comparative Analysis of Intelligent Transportation Systems for Sustainable Environment in Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-12, June.
    18. Sinha, Avik & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2018. "Estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emission: Role of renewable energy generation in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 703-711.
    19. Miriam Müller & Oscar Reutter, 2017. "Vision Development towards a Sustainable North Rhine-Westphalia 2030 in a Science-Practice-Dialogue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-27, June.
    20. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:21:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-018-0096-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.