IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v33y2023i1d10.1007_s12525-023-00630-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-ownership business models in the manufacturing industry: Uncertainty-exploiting versus uncertainty-mitigating designs and the role of context factors

Author

Listed:
  • Maximilian Bock

    (Bayern Innovativ GmbH)

  • Martin Wiener

    (TU Dresden)

  • Carol Saunders

    (University of Pretoria
    University of Central Florida)

Abstract

With the emergence of the Industrial Internet of Things, a growing number of manufacturing firms has started to adopt non-ownership business models (NOBMs). NOBM providers maintain ownership of offered machinery and sell only the machine use and/or performance as a service to their clients. While the adoption of NOBMs is found to be associated with novel business opportunities related to client-side uncertainties, it is also found to result in a considerable increase in provider-side uncertainties. Drawing on a multiple-case study with three leading manufacturers, we find notable differences in terms of NOBM designs, ranging from a primary focus on exploiting client-side uncertainties to a primary focus on mitigating provider-side uncertainties. Moreover, our study uncovers four context factors that help explain key differences in NOBM designs. In particular, we identify two machine attributes (human dependency and energy efficiency) and two market attributes (average client size and antitrust regulations) that “push” providers toward either uncertainty-exploiting or uncertainty-mitigating NOBM designs. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Maximilian Bock & Martin Wiener & Carol Saunders, 2023. "Non-ownership business models in the manufacturing industry: Uncertainty-exploiting versus uncertainty-mitigating designs and the role of context factors," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:33:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-023-00630-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-023-00630-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-023-00630-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-023-00630-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Garcia Martin, Patricia Carolina & Schroeder, Andreas & Ziaee Bigdeli, Ali, 2019. "The value architecture of servitization: Expanding the research scope," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 438-449.
    2. repec:dar:wpaper:63687 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Vandermerwe, Sandra & Rada, Juan, 1988. "Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 314-324, December.
    4. Visnjic, Ivanka & Neely, Andy & Jovanovic, Marin, 2018. "The path to outcome delivery: Interplay of service market strategy and open business models," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 72, pages 46-59.
    5. Grubic, Tonci & Jennions, Ian, 2018. "Do outcome-based contracts exist? The investigation of power-by-the-hour and similar result-oriented cases," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 209-219.
    6. Raphael Amit & Christoph Zott, 2001. "Value creation in E‐business," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 493-520, June.
    7. Federico Adrodegari & Nicola Saccani, 2017. "Business models for the service transformation of industrial firms," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 57-83, January.
    8. Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2019. "Relational governance strategies for advanced service provision: Multiple paths to superior financial performance in servitization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 906-915.
    9. Veit, Daniel J. & Clemons, Eric K. & Benlian, Alexander & Buxmann, Peter & Hess, Thomas & Kundisch, D. & Leimeister, Jan Marco & Loos, Peter & Spann, Martin, 2014. "Business Models – an Information Systems Research Agenda," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 62747, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    10. Weking, Jörg & Stöcker, Maria & Kowalkiewicz, Marek & Böhm, Markus & Krcmar, Helmut, 2020. "Leveraging industry 4.0 – A business model pattern framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    11. Henry Chesbrough & Richard S. Rosenbloom, 2002. "The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(3), pages 529-555, June.
    12. Stefan Worm & Sundar G. Bharadwaj & Wolfgang Ulaga & Werner J. Reinartz, 2017. "When and why do customer solutions pay off in business markets?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 490-512, July.
    13. repec:dar:wpaper:64420 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Ng, Irene C.L. & Maull, Roger & Yip, Nick, 2009. "Outcome-based contracts as a driver for systems thinking and service-dominant logic in service science: Evidence from the defence industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 377-387, December.
    15. Oktay Turetken & Paul Grefen & Rick Gilsing & O. Ege Adali, 2019. "Service-Dominant Business Model Design for Digital Innovation in Smart Mobility," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(1), pages 9-29, February.
    16. Turunen, Taija & Finne, Max, 2014. "The organisational environment’s impact on the servitization of manufacturers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 603-615.
    17. Kostas Selviaridis & Finn Wynstra, 2015. "Performance-based contracting: a literature review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(12), pages 3505-3540, June.
    18. Wei, Zelong & Song, Xi & Wang, Donghan, 2017. "Manufacturing flexibility, business model design, and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 87-97.
    19. Gebauer, Heiko & Fleisch, Elgar & Friedli, Thomas, 2005. "Overcoming the Service Paradox in Manufacturing Companies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 14-26, February.
    20. A. Bikfalvi & G. Lay & S. Maloca & B. Waser, 2013. "Servitization and networking: large-scale survey findings on product-related services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(1), pages 61-82, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Ai Qiang & Kumar, Maneesh & Claes, Björn & Found, Pauline, 2020. "The state-of-the-art of the theory on Product-Service Systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Tian, Jiamian & Coreynen, Wim & Matthyssens, Paul & Shen, Lei, 2022. "Platform-based servitization and business model adaptation by established manufacturers," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Palo, Teea & Åkesson, Maria & Löfberg, Nina, 2019. "Servitization as business model contestation: A practice approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 486-496.
    4. Marko Kohtamäki & Stephan C. Henneberg & Veronica Martinez & Koji Kimita & Heiko Gebauer, 2019. "A Configurational Approach to Servitization: Review and Research Directions," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 213-240, October.
    5. Koppe, Timo & Islam, Nihal, 2021. "Digital Service Innovation in Plant and Mechanical Engineering: Exploring Contextual Factors in the Innovation Process," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 126914, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    6. Korkeamäki, Lauri & Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit, 2021. "Worth the risk? The profit impact of outcome-based service offerings for manufacturing firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 92-102.
    7. Datta, Partha Priya, 2020. "Hidden costs in different stages of advanced services – A multi-actor perspective of performance based contracts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 667-685.
    8. Koppe, Timo & Wahl-Islam, Nihal, 2021. "Digital Service Innovation in Plant and Mechanical Engineering: Exploring Contextual Factors in the Innovation Process," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 124695, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Wim Coreynen & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Johanna Vanderstraeten, 2021. "Toward Servitized Research: An Integrated Approach for Sustainable Product-Service Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Mar’atus Sholihah & Tatsuru Maezono & Yuya Mitake & Yoshiki Shimomura, 2019. "PSS Strategic Alignment: Linking Service Transition Strategy with PSS Business Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-30, November.
    11. Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit & Oghazi, Pejvak & Gebauer, Heiko & Baines, Tim, 2019. "Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 380-392.
    12. Coreynen, Wim & Vanderstraeten, Johanna & van Witteloostuijn, Arjen & Cannaerts, Nele & Loots, Ellen & Slabbinck, Hendrik, 2020. "What drives product-service integration? An abductive study of decision-makers’ motives and value strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 189-200.
    13. Grubic, Tonci & Jennions, Ian, 2018. "Do outcome-based contracts exist? The investigation of power-by-the-hour and similar result-oriented cases," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 209-219.
    14. Budler, Marko & Župič, Ivan & Trkman, Peter, 2021. "The development of business model research: A bibliometric review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 480-495.
    15. Green, Maxwell H. & Davies, Philip & Ng, Irene C.L., 2017. "Two strands of servitization: A thematic analysis of traditional and customer co-created servitization and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 40-53.
    16. Jieun Lee & Hyung-Deok Shin & Saehwa Hong, 2021. "Servitization of Global Manufacturing Business," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 565-584, December.
    17. Helms, Thorsten, 2016. "Asset transformation and the challenges to servitize a utility business model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 98-112.
    18. Zhou, Dan & Yan, Tingting & Dai, Weiqi & Feng, Junzheng, 2021. "Disentangling the interactions within and between servitization and digitalization strategies: A service-dominant logic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    19. Cenamor, J. & Rönnberg Sjödin, D. & Parida, V., 2017. "Adopting a platform approach in servitization: Leveraging the value of digitalization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 54-65.
    20. Paiola, Marco & Schiavone, Francesco & Khvatova, Tatiana & Grandinetti, Roberto, 2021. "Prior knowledge, industry 4.0 and digital servitization. An inductive framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Non-ownership business models (NOBMs); NOBM designs; Uncertainty exploitation vs. mitigation; Context factors; Manufacturing industry; Multiple-case study;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure
    • L64 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Other Machinery; Business Equipment; Armaments
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:33:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-023-00630-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.