IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v31y2021i2d10.1007_s12525-019-00366-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data quality in recommender systems: the impact of completeness of item content data on prediction accuracy of recommender systems

Author

Listed:
  • Bernd Heinrich

    (University of Regensburg)

  • Marcus Hopf

    (University of Regensburg)

  • Daniel Lohninger

    (University of Regensburg)

  • Alexander Schiller

    (University of Regensburg)

  • Michael Szubartowicz

    (University of Regensburg)

Abstract

Recommender systems strive to guide users, especially in the field of e-commerce, to their individually best choice when a large number of alternatives is available. In general, literature suggests that the quality of data which a recommender system is based on may have important impact on recommendation quality. In this paper, we focus on the data quality dimension completeness of item content data (i.e., features of items and their feature values) and investigate its impact on the prediction accuracy of recommender systems. In particular, we examine the increase in completeness per item, per user and per feature as moderators for this impact. To this end, we present a theoretical model based on the literature and derive ten hypotheses. We test these hypotheses on two real-world data sets, one from two leading web portals for restaurant reviews and another one from a movie review portal. The results strongly support that, in general, the prediction accuracy is positively influenced by increased completeness. However, the results also reveal, contrary to existing literature, that among others increasing completeness by adding features which differ significantly from already existing features (i.e., a high diversity) does not positively influence the prediction accuracy of recommender systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernd Heinrich & Marcus Hopf & Daniel Lohninger & Alexander Schiller & Michael Szubartowicz, 2021. "Data quality in recommender systems: the impact of completeness of item content data on prediction accuracy of recommender systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 389-409, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:31:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12525-019-00366-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-019-00366-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-019-00366-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-019-00366-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald P. Ballou & Harold L. Pazer, 1985. "Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 150-162, February.
    2. Gediminas Adomavicius & Jingjing Zhang, 2016. "Classification, Ranking, and Top-K Stability of Recommendation Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 129-147, February.
    3. Geuens, Stijn & Coussement, Kristof & De Bock, Koen W., 2018. "A framework for configuring collaborative filtering-based recommendations derived from purchase data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 208-218.
    4. Stijn Geuens & Kristof Coussement & Koen W. de Bock, 2018. "A framework for configuring collaborative filtering-based recommendations derived from purchase data," Post-Print hal-01662029, HAL.
    5. Chong Ju Choi & Carla C. J. M. Millar & Caroline Y. L. Wong, 2005. "Knowledge and the State," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Knowledge Entanglements, chapter 0, pages 19-38, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Michael Feldman & Adir Even & Yisrael Parmet, 2018. "A methodology for quantifying the effect of missing data on decision quality in classification problems," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(11), pages 2643-2663, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rainer Alt, 2021. "Electronic Markets on digital platforms and AI," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 233-241, June.
    2. Markus Binder & Bernd Heinrich & Marcus Hopf & Alexander Schiller, 2022. "Global reconstruction of language models with linguistic rules – Explainable AI for online consumer reviews," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2123-2138, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huosong Xia & Xiang Wei & Wuyue An & Zuopeng Justin Zhang & Zelin Sun, 2021. "Design of electronic-commerce recommendation systems based on outlier mining," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 295-311, June.
    2. Gupta, Mukul & Kumar, Pradeep, 2020. "Recommendation generation using personalized weight of meta-paths in heterogeneous information networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 660-674.
    3. Bogaert, Matthias & Lootens, Justine & Van den Poel, Dirk & Ballings, Michel, 2019. "Evaluating multi-label classifiers and recommender systems in the financial service sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 620-634.
    4. Park, YoungSoo & Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bosung, 2022. "Online retail operations with “Try-Before-You-Buy”," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 987-1002.
    5. T. Venkatesan & K. Saravanan & T. Ramkumar, 2019. "A Big Data Recommendation Engine Framework Based on Local Pattern Analytics Strategy for Mining Multi-Sourced Big Data," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Junmei Feng & Xiaoyi Fengs & Ning Zhang & Jinye Peng, 2018. "An improved collaborative filtering method based on similarity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Hana Kim & Daeho Lee & Min Ho Ryu, 2018. "An Optimal Strategic Business Model for Small Businesses Using Online Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Behera, Rajat Kumar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Gupta, Shivam & Kamboj, Shampy & Bala, Pradip Kumar, 2020. "Personalized digital marketing recommender engine," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    9. Fan, Zhi-Ping & Sun, Minghe, 2016. "A multi-kernel support tensor machine for classification with multitype multiway data and an application to cross-selling recommendationsAuthor-Name: Chen, Zhen-Yu," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 110-120.
    10. Bernd Heinrich & Marcus Hopf & Daniel Lohninger & Alexander Schiller & Michael Szubartowicz, 2022. "Something’s Missing? A Procedure for Extending Item Content Data Sets in the Context of Recommender Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 267-286, February.
    11. Liang Xiao & Qibei Lu & Feipeng Guo, 2020. "Mobile Personalized Recommendation Model based on Privacy Concerns and Context Analysis for the Sustainable Development of M-commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    12. K. Coussement & K. W. Bock & S. Geuens, 2022. "A decision-analytic framework for interpretable recommendation systems with multiple input data sources: a case study for a European e-tailer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 671-694, August.
    13. Xiong, Yingqiu & Liu, Yezheng & Qian, Yang & Jiang, Yuanchun & Chai, Yidong & Ling, Haifeng, 2024. "Review-based recommendation under preference uncertainty: An asymmetric deep learning framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1044-1057.
    14. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    15. Joanna Sokolowska & Patrycja Sleboda, 2015. "The Inverse Relation Between Risks and Benefits: The Role of Affect and Expertise," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(7), pages 1252-1267, July.
    16. Donald R. Haurin & Stuart S. Rosenthal, 2009. "Language, Agglomeration and Hispanic Homeownership," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 37(2), pages 155-183, June.
    17. Jong Won Min, 2019. "The Influence of Stigma and Views on Mental Health Treatment Effectiveness on Service Use by Age and Ethnicity: Evidence From the CDC BRFSS 2007, 2009, and 2012," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    18. Alwang, Jeffrey & Larochelle, Catherine & Barrera, Victor, 2017. "Farm Decision Making and Gender: Results from a Randomized Experiment in Ecuador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 117-129.
    19. Yanina Welp & Ferran Urgell & Eduard Aibar, 2007. "From Bureaucratic Administration to Network Administration? An Empirical Study on E-Government Focus on Catalonia," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 299-316, December.
    20. Brent Hammer & Helen Vallianatos & Candace Nykiforuk & Laura Nieuwendyk, 2015. "Perceptions of healthy eating in four Alberta communities: a photovoice project," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(4), pages 649-662, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Completeness; Data quality; Prediction accuracy; Recommender systems;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C80 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:31:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12525-019-00366-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.