IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v31y2021i1d10.1007_s12525-019-00344-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving business process and functionality using IoT based E3-value business model

Author

Listed:
  • Alaa Shoukry

    (King Saud University
    Workers University)

  • Jameel Khader

    (King Saud University)

  • Showkat Gani

    (King Saud University)

Abstract

The rapid development of the internet and its technologies helps enhance business models, product lifecycles, and services, etc. In addition, the Internet of Things (IoT) manages platforms for e-business and functionality. Even though the IoT-based e-business model improves overall business possibilities, it has several issues such as exact information on business assets and difficulties in the requirements analysis as well as in managing the large volume of business data. This paper introduces the E3-value business model for examining each requirement that successfully predicts the core elements of business, distribution channels, company propositions, and so on. The E3-value model examines the business processes, business segments, interfaces, value objects, and value offerings that successfully defines business and the related business functionality used to improve the overall performance of the business process. The developed method successfully overcomes the abovementioned issues, and the excellence of the IoT-based e-commerce system is evaluated using a relevant medical e-business process case study. Further, the efficiency of the system is evaluated using business process accuracy, end-user satisfaction, the Magnitude Relative Error, and the Pearson Correlation Coefficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaa Shoukry & Jameel Khader & Showkat Gani, 2021. "Improving business process and functionality using IoT based E3-value business model," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 17-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:31:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-019-00344-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-019-00344-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-019-00344-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-019-00344-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jun Zhang & Yan Hu & Zhaolong Ning & Amr Tolba & Elsayed Elashkar & Feng Xia, 2018. "AIRank: Author Impact Ranking through Positions in Collaboration Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-16, June.
    2. Paul Benjamin Lowry & Anthony Vance & Greg Moody & Bryan Beckman & Aaron Read, 2008. "Explaining and Predicting the Impact of Branding Alliances and Web Site Quality on Initial Consumer Trust of E-Commerce Web Sites," Post-Print halshs-00684347, HAL.
    3. Xiaopu Shang & Runtong Zhang & Ying Chen, 2012. "Internet of Things (IoT) Service Architecture and its Application in E-Commerce," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 10(3), pages 44-55, July.
    4. Henry Chesbrough & Richard S. Rosenbloom, 2002. "The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(3), pages 529-555, June.
    5. Jiaying Liu & Tao Tang & Xiangjie Kong & Amr Tolba & Zafer AL-Makhadmeh & Feng Xia, 2018. "Understanding the advisor–advisee relationship via scholarly data analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 161-180, July.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12465 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Wei Wang & Xiaomei Bai & Feng Xia & Teshome Megersa Bekele & Xiaoyan Su & Amr Tolba, 2017. "From triadic closure to conference closure: the role of academic conferences in promoting scientific collaborations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 177-193, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gunasekaran Manogaran & Naveen Chilamkurti & Ching-Hsien Hsu, 2021. "Internet of Things for Electronic Markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 13-15, March.
    2. Serhiienko Olena & Mashchenko Maryna & Samorodov Borys & Babichev Anatoliy & Klimenko Olena, 2024. "Simulation and Optimisation of Business Process Management: Case Study of IT Company," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 67-90.
    3. Graziela Molling & Amarolinda Zanela Klein, 2022. "Value proposition of IoT-based products and services: a framework proposal," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 899-926, June.
    4. Sunil Mithas & Zhi‐Long Chen & Terence J.V. Saldanha & Alysson De Oliveira Silveira, 2022. "How will artificial intelligence and Industry 4.0 emerging technologies transform operations management?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4475-4487, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    2. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Yuliya Snihur & Llewellyn D. W. Thomas & Robert A. Burgelman, 2018. "An Ecosystem‐Level Process Model of Business Model Disruption: The Disruptor's Gambit," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1278-1316, November.
    4. Richard Hunt & Lauren Ortiz-Hunt, 2018. "Deinstitutionalization through Business Model Evolution: Women Entrepreneurs in the Middle East and North Africa," Chapters, in: Ladislav Mura (ed.), Entrepreneurship - Development Tendencies and Empirical Approach, IntechOpen.
    5. Hudson Pacifico Silva & Pascale Lehoux & Renata Pozelli Sabio, 2024. "Challenges to Responsible Value Creation During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Multiple Case Study on SMEs’ Transformative Responses," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14012-14035, September.
    6. Nitin Walia & Mark Srite & Wendy Huddleston, 2016. "Eyeing the web interface: the influence of price, product, and personal involvement," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 297-333, September.
    7. Chang, Yuan-Chieh & Chen, Min-Nan, 2016. "Service regime and innovation clusters: An empirical study from service firms in Taiwan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1845-1857.
    8. Daniele Schiliro, 2015. "Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises in the United Arab Emirates," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 3(5), pages 148-160, September.
    9. Laya, Andrés & Sundquist, Mårten & Markendahl, Jan, 2015. "Motivation, Regulation And Actor Constellations - Experiences From A Multidisciplinary Research Project On Health And Wellbeing As Part Of The Internet Of Things," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127160, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    10. Livio Cricelli & Michele Grimaldi & Silvia Vermicelli, 2022. "Crowdsourcing and open innovation: a systematic literature review, an integrated framework and a research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1269-1310, July.
    11. Nyangon, Joseph & Byrne, John, 2018. "Diversifying Electricity Customer Choice: REVing Up the New York Energy Vision for Polycentric Innovation," MPRA Paper 91486, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    13. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Fredrich, Viktor, 2016. "Good fences make good neighbors? Directions and safeguards in alliances on business model innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5196-5202.
    14. Aladwani, Adel M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Towards a theory of SocioCitizenry: Quality anticipation, trust configuration, and approved adaptation of governmental social media," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 261-272.
    15. Sebastian Schroedel, 2023. "The Sustainable Business Model Database: 92 Patterns That Enable Sustainability in Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    16. Sabyasachi Sinha, 2015. "The Exploration–Exploitation Dilemma: A Review in the Context of Managing Growth of New Ventures," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 40(3), pages 313-323, September.
    17. Gerrit Remane & Andre Hanelt & Jan F. Tesch & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2017. "The Business Model Pattern Database — A Tool For Systematic Business Model Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-61, January.
    18. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    19. Laura McNamee & Fred Ledley, 2013. "Translational Science by Public Biotechnology Companies in the IPO“Class of 2000”: The Impact of Technological Maturity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-7, December.
    20. Hall, Stephen & Roelich, Katy, 2016. "Business model innovation in electricity supply markets: The role of complex value in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 286-298.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:31:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-019-00344-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.