IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v22y2022i2d10.1007_s10660-020-09433-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the efficiency of electronic reverse auction settings: big data evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Radovan Dráb

    (Technical University of Košice)

  • Tomáš Štofa

    (Technical University of Košice)

  • Radoslav Delina

    (Technical University of Košice)

Abstract

Despite the existence of research in the field of electronic reverse auctions (eRAs), there is still a limited understanding of the determinants of auction savings that exist in this process, especially factors that can change information asymmetry during auctions. In comparison with other studies, attempts have been made to test the effects of various levels of information asymmetry through the prolongation of auctions and through changes to minimum bid amounts on auction results, as well as other modifiable variables. More than 11,000 eRAs were analysedusing data from a leading auction platform in Central Europe. The application of the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test on data divided by medians of analyzed variables has been confirmed as a valid method for verifying the significance of the developed conceptual model relationships. While confirming several relations indicated by laboratory experiments and other studies, several findings to the contrary of the expected relationships were also confirmed.

Suggested Citation

  • Radovan Dráb & Tomáš Štofa & Radoslav Delina, 2022. "Analysis of the efficiency of electronic reverse auction settings: big data evidence," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 427-450, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:22:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10660-020-09433-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-020-09433-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-020-09433-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-020-09433-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pham, Long & Teich, Jeffrey & Wallenius, Hannele & Wallenius, Jyrki, 2015. "Multi-attribute online reverse auctions: Recent research trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 1-9.
    2. Jan Pavel & Emilia Sičáková-Beblavá, 2013. "Do E-Auctions Realy Improve the Efficiency of Public Procurement? The Case of the Slovak Municipalities," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(1), pages 111-124.
    3. Schoenherr, Tobias & Mabert, Vincent A., 2007. "Online reverse auctions: Common myths versus evolving reality," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(5), pages 373-384.
    4. Oktay Karabağ & Barış Tan, 2019. "An empirical analysis of the main drivers affecting the buyer surplus in E-auctions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(11), pages 3435-3465, June.
    5. Alan D. Smith, 2009. "The impact of e-procurement systems on customer relationship management: a multiple case study," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 314-338.
    6. Raventós, Pedro & Zolezzi, Sandro, 2015. "Electronic tendering of pharmaceuticals and medical devices in Chile," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2569-2578.
    7. Smeltzer, Larry R. & Carr, Amelia, 2002. "Reverse auctions in industrial marketing and buying," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 47-52.
    8. Yili Hong & Chong (Alex) Wang & Paul A. Pavlou, 2016. "Comparing Open and Sealed Bid Auctions: Evidence from Online Labor Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 49-69, March.
    9. Ido Millet & Diane H. Parente & John L. Fizel & Ray R. Venkataraman, 2004. "Metrics for Managing Online Procurement Auctions," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 171-179, June.
    10. Wedad J. Elmaghraby & Elena Katok & Natalia Santamaría, 2012. "A Laboratory Investigation of Rank Feedback in Procurement Auctions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 128-144, January.
    11. Sebastian Stoll & Gregor Zöttl, 2017. "Transparency in Buyer-Determined Auctions: Should Quality be Private or Public?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(11), pages 2006-2032, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radoslav Delina & Renata Olejarova & Petr Doucek, 2023. "Effect of a new potential supplier on business to business negotiations performance: evidence-based analysis," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1941-1970, September.
    2. Yili Hong & Chong (Alex) Wang & Paul A. Pavlou, 2016. "Comparing Open and Sealed Bid Auctions: Evidence from Online Labor Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 49-69, March.
    3. Alok Gupta & Stephen Parente & Pallab Sanyal, 2012. "Competitive bidding for health insurance contracts: lessons from the online HMO auctions," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 303-322, December.
    4. Raventós, Pedro & Zolezzi, Sandro, 2015. "Electronic tendering of pharmaceuticals and medical devices in Chile," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2569-2578.
    5. Jie Xiang & Juliang Zhang & T. C. E. Cheng & Jose Maria Sallan & Guowei Hua, 2019. "Efficient Multi-Attribute Auctions Considering Supply Disruption," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(03), pages 1-28, June.
    6. Hur, Daesik & Mabert, Vincent A. & Hartley, Janet L., 2007. "Getting the most out of reverse e-auction investment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 403-416, August.
    7. Li, Zhipeng & Zhou, Xiaoyu & Huang, Shoujun, 2021. "Managing skill certification in online outsourcing platforms: A perspective of buyer-determined reverse auctions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    8. Qian, Cheng & Anderson, Edward, 2020. "Buyer’s optimal information revelation strategy in procurement auctions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1011-1025.
    9. Chen Liang & Yili Hong & Pei-Yu Chen & Benjamin B. M. Shao, 2022. "The Screening Role of Design Parameters for Service Procurement Auctions in Online Service Outsourcing Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1324-1343, December.
    10. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    11. Pham, Long & Teich, Jeffrey & Wallenius, Hannele & Wallenius, Jyrki, 2015. "Multi-attribute online reverse auctions: Recent research trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 1-9.
    12. Yu, Ya-wen & Yu, Hsiao-Cheng & Itoga, Holly & Lin, Tyng-Ruu, 2008. "Decision-making factors for effective industrial e-procurement," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 163-169.
    13. Cheng, Meng & Xu, Su Xiu & Huang, George Q., 2016. "Truthful multi-unit multi-attribute double auctions for perishable supply chain trading," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 21-37.
    14. Ernan Haruvy & Peter Popkowski Leszczyc & Octavian Carare & James Cox & Eric Greenleaf & Wolfgang Jank & Sandy Jap & Young-Hoon Park & Michael Rothkopf, 2008. "Competition between auctions," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 431-448, December.
    15. Niklas Klarnskou & Philippos Louis & Wouter Passtoors, 2024. "Feedback and Competition in Procurement e-Auctions," University of Cyprus Working Papers in Economics 04-2024, University of Cyprus Department of Economics.
    16. Aijun Liu & Yaxuan Xiao & Zengxian Li & Ruiyao Wang, 2022. "An agent‐based multiattribute reverse auction approach for online secondhand commodities," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 129-145, January.
    17. Nicola Bellantuono & Donatella Ettorre & Gregory E. Kersten & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2014. "Multi-attribute Auction and Negotiation for e-Procurement of Logistics," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 421-441, May.
    18. Irfan Kanat & Yili Hong & T. S. Raghu, 2018. "Surviving in Global Online Labor Markets for IT Services: A Geo-Economic Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 893-909, December.
    19. Joel O. Wooten & Joan M. Donohue & Timothy D. Fry & Kathleen M. Whitcomb, 2020. "To Thine Own Self Be True: Asymmetric Information in Procurement Auctions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1679-1701, July.
    20. Tunay I. Tunca & D. J. Wu & Fang (Vivian) Zhong, 2014. "An Empirical Analysis of Price, Quality, and Incumbency in Procurement Auctions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 346-364, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:22:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10660-020-09433-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.