IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v18y2018i4d10.1007_s10660-018-9287-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving sparsity and new user problems in collaborative filtering by clustering the personality factors

Author

Listed:
  • Zahra Yusefi Hafshejani

    (University of Isfahan)

  • Marjan Kaedi

    (University of Isfahan)

  • Afsaneh Fatemi

    (University of Isfahan)

Abstract

In collaborative filtering recommender systems, items recommended to an active user are selected based on the interests of users similar to him/her. Collaborative filtering systems suffer from the ‘sparsity’ and ‘new user’ problems. The former refers to the insufficiency of data about users’ preferences and the latter addresses the lack of enough information about the new-coming user. Clustering users is an effective way to improve the performance of collaborative filtering systems in facing the aforementioned problems. In previous studies, users were clustered based on characteristics such as ratings given by them as well as their age, gender, occupation, and geographical location. On the other hand, studies show that there is a significant relationship between users’ personality traits and their interests. To alleviate the sparsity and new user problems, this paper presents a new collaborative filtering system in which users are clustered based on their ‘personality traits’. In the proposed method, the personality of each user is described according to the big-5 personality model and users with similar personality are placed in the same cluster using K-means algorithm. The unknown ratings of the sparse user-item matrix are then estimated based on the clustered users, and recommendations are found for a new user according to a user-based approach which relays on the interests of the users with similar personality to him/her. In addition, for an existing user in the system, recommendations are offered in an item-based approach in which the similarity of items is estimated based on the ratings of users similar to him/her in personality. The proposed method is compared to some former collaborative filtering systems. The results demonstrate that in facing the data sparsity and new user problems, this method reduces the mean absolute error and improves the precision of the recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Zahra Yusefi Hafshejani & Marjan Kaedi & Afsaneh Fatemi, 2018. "Improving sparsity and new user problems in collaborative filtering by clustering the personality factors," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 813-836, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:18:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-018-9287-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-018-9287-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-018-9287-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-018-9287-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chong Ju Choi & Carla C. J. M. Millar & Caroline Y. L. Wong, 2005. "Knowledge and the State," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Knowledge Entanglements, chapter 0, pages 19-38, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qian Wang & Jijun Yu & Weiwei Deng, 2019. "An adjustable re-ranking approach for improving the individual and aggregate diversities of product recommendations," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 59-79, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Hinz & Jochen Eckert, 2010. "The Impact of Search and Recommendation Systems on Sales in Electronic Commerce," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(2), pages 67-77, April.
    2. Xiao-Bai Li & Jialun Qin, 2017. "Anonymizing and Sharing Medical Text Records," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 332-352, June.
    3. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    4. Martinovici, A., 2019. "Revealing attention - how eye movements predict brand choice and moment of choice," Other publications TiSEM 7dca38a5-9f78-4aee-bd81-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Joanna Sokolowska & Patrycja Sleboda, 2015. "The Inverse Relation Between Risks and Benefits: The Role of Affect and Expertise," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(7), pages 1252-1267, July.
    6. Donald R. Haurin & Stuart S. Rosenthal, 2009. "Language, Agglomeration and Hispanic Homeownership," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 37(2), pages 155-183, June.
    7. Jong Won Min, 2019. "The Influence of Stigma and Views on Mental Health Treatment Effectiveness on Service Use by Age and Ethnicity: Evidence From the CDC BRFSS 2007, 2009, and 2012," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    8. Zhan (Michael) Shi & T. S. Raghu, 2020. "An Economic Analysis of Product Recommendation in the Presence of Quality and Taste-Match Heterogeneity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 399-411, June.
    9. Voxi Amavilah & Antonio R. Andrés, 2014. "Globalization, Peace & Stability, Governance, and Knowledge Economy," Research Africa Network Working Papers 14/012, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    10. Alwang, Jeffrey & Larochelle, Catherine & Barrera, Victor, 2017. "Farm Decision Making and Gender: Results from a Randomized Experiment in Ecuador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 117-129.
    11. Yanina Welp & Ferran Urgell & Eduard Aibar, 2007. "From Bureaucratic Administration to Network Administration? An Empirical Study on E-Government Focus on Catalonia," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 299-316, December.
    12. Brent Hammer & Helen Vallianatos & Candace Nykiforuk & Laura Nieuwendyk, 2015. "Perceptions of healthy eating in four Alberta communities: a photovoice project," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(4), pages 649-662, December.
    13. Amine Dadoun & Michael Defoin-Platel & Thomas Fiig & Corinne Landra & Raphaël Troncy, 2021. "How recommender systems can transform airline offer construction and retailing," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 301-315, June.
    14. Parag, Yael & Darby, Sarah, 2009. "Consumer-supplier-government triangular relations: Rethinking the UK policy path for carbon emissions reduction from the UK residential sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 3984-3992, October.
    15. Umberto Panniello & Michele Gorgoglione & Alexander Tuzhilin, 2016. "Research Note—In CARSs We Trust: How Context-Aware Recommendations Affect Customers’ Trust and Other Business Performance Measures of Recommender Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 182-196, March.
    16. Shiau, Wen-Lung & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Yang, Han Suan, 2017. "Co-citation and cluster analyses of extant literature on social networks," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 390-399.
    17. Kim, Jae Kyeong & Kim, Hyea Kyeong & Oh, Hee Young & Ryu, Young U., 2010. "A group recommendation system for online communities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 212-219.
    18. Quentin Plantec & Benjamin Cabanes & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2021. "Market-Pull Or Research Push? Effects Of Research Orientations On University-Industry Collaborative Ph.D. Projects' Performances," Post-Print halshs-03190142, HAL.
    19. Gupta, Mukul & Kumar, Pradeep, 2020. "Recommendation generation using personalized weight of meta-paths in heterogeneous information networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 660-674.
    20. Mikko Jauho & Johanna Mäkelä & Mari Niva, 2016. "Demarcating Social Practices: The Case of Weight Management," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(2), pages 10-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:18:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-018-9287-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.