IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v17y2017i4d10.1007_s10660-016-9238-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the operation of cloud supply chain: adoption barriers and business model

Author

Listed:
  • Jhih-Hua Jhang-Li

    (Hsing Wu University)

  • Cheng-Wei Chang

    (Hsing Wu University)

Abstract

Although on-demand cloud services are considered to be cost-saving solution for small and medium-sized enterprises, data security and cloud interoperability remain the major barriers for the adoption of cloud services. In addition, the operation of a cloud supply chain consisting of an independent software vendor (ISV) and Software-as-a-service provider may be inefficient without an automatic centralized platform for bundling and delivering ISVs’ applications to subscribers. In fact, these concerns can be resolved if all applications follow the same procedures to work together. Therefore, this study examines the operation of a cloud supply chain in which an intermediary offers a packaging service. The service helps ISVs wrap their applications according to a specific industry standard. This can reduce cost and time needed for deploying and updating applications. By examining an ISV’s channel selection and an intermediary’s pricing offer, our approach helps identify the conditions under which the selling channel is more profitable for the ISV. In addition, the importance of dual channel is highlighted when the intermediary becomes the ISV’s cloud partner. However, the adoption of dual channel does not lead to the highest profit if the quality of the software product is inadequate. We also find that the intermediary has to lower the service fee when there are lots of barriers to cloud adoption, even if the importance of the packaging service increases with the adoption cost. Finally, we find that the R&D for reducing adoption barriers implemented by the ISV may increase or damage the profit of the intermediary, which depends upon the benefits gained from its packaging service.

Suggested Citation

  • Jhih-Hua Jhang-Li & Cheng-Wei Chang, 2017. "Analyzing the operation of cloud supply chain: adoption barriers and business model," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 627-660, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:17:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-016-9238-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-016-9238-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-016-9238-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-016-9238-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juthasit Rohitratana & Jorn Altmann, 2012. "Impact of Pricing Schemes on a Market for Software-as-a-Service and Perpetual Software," TEMEP Discussion Papers 201288, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Mar 2012.
    2. Nadège Marchand & Arno Jacobsen, 2001. "An Economic Model to Study Dependencies Between Application Software Vendors and Application Service Providers," Post-Print halshs-00150751, HAL.
    3. Dumrongsiri, Aussadavut & Fan, Ming & Jain, Apurva & Moinzadeh, Kamran, 2008. "A supply chain model with direct and retail channels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 691-718, June.
    4. Wei-yu Kevin Chiang & Dilip Chhajed & James D. Hess, 2003. "Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Debabrata Dey & Ming Fan & Conglei Zhang, 2010. "Design and Analysis of Contracts for Software Outsourcing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 93-114, March.
    6. Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
    7. Derrick Huang, C. & Hu, Qing & Behara, Ravi S., 2008. "An economic analysis of the optimal information security investment in the case of a risk-averse firm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 793-804, August.
    8. Yasin Ceran & Milind Dawande & Dengpan Liu & Vijay Mookerjee, 2014. "Optimal Software Reuse in Incremental Software Development: A Transfer Pricing Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 541-559, March.
    9. Parente, Stephen L & Prescott, Edward C, 1994. "Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(2), pages 298-321, April.
    10. Fan, Ming & Kumar, Subodha & Whinston, Andrew B., 2009. "Short-term and long-term competition between providers of shrink-wrap software and software as a service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 661-671, July.
    11. Sonja Lehmann & Peter Buxmann, 2009. "Pricing Strategies of Software Vendors," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(6), pages 452-462, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Zhao, 2022. "Will the community O2O service supply channel benefit the elderly healthcare service supply chain?," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1617-1650, December.
    2. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin) & McHaney, Roger & Sheu, Chwen, 2020. "Exploring social media use in B2B supply chain operations," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 73-84.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matsui, Kenji, 2020. "Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 225-236.
    2. Zhisong Chen & Li Fang & Shong-Iee Ivan Su, 2021. "The value of offline channel subsidy in bricks and clicks: an O2O supply chain coordination perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 599-643, June.
    3. Yang, Huixiao & Luo, Jianwen & Zhang, Qinhong, 2018. "Supplier encroachment under nonlinear pricing with imperfect substitutes: Bargaining power versus revenue-sharing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1089-1101.
    4. Matsui, Kenji, 2022. "Should a retailer bargain over a wholesale price with a manufacturer using a dual-channel supply chain?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 1050-1066.
    5. Ciwei Dong & Liu Yang & Chi To Ng, 2020. "Quantity Leadership for a Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Retail Service," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 37(02), pages 1-32, March.
    6. Jiali Qu & Benyong Hu & Chao Meng, 2021. "Joint Innovation Investment and Pricing Decisions in Retail Supply Chains with Customer Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Yan, Ruiliang & Wang, John & Zhou, Bin, 2010. "Channel integration and profit sharing in the dynamics of multi-channel firms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 430-440.
    8. Frank Bodendorf & Manuel Lutz & Jörg Franke, 2021. "Valuation and pricing of software licenses to support supplier–buyer negotiations: A case study in the automotive industry," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1686-1702, October.
    9. Modak, Nikunja Mohan & Kelle, Peter, 2019. "Managing a dual-channel supply chain under price and delivery-time dependent stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 147-161.
    10. Xiao, Tiaojun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2014. "Product variety and channel structure strategy for a retailer-Stackelberg supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 114-124.
    11. Haitao Chen & Zhaohui Dong & Gendao Li, 2020. "Government Reward-Penalty Mechanism in Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Lijing Zhu & Xiaohang Ren & Chulung Lee & Yumeng Zhang, 2017. "Coordination Contracts in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain with a Risk-Averse Retailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Zhang, Peng & He, Yong & Shi, Chunming (Victor), 2017. "Retailer's channel structure choice: Online channel, offline channel, or dual channels?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 37-50.
    14. Li, Mengmeng & Mizuno, Shinji, 2022. "Comparison of dynamic and static pricing strategies in a dual-channel supply chain with inventory control," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    15. Yang, Wenjuan & Zhang, Jiantong & Yan, Hong, 2021. "Impacts of online consumer reviews on a dual-channel supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Shao, Xiaofeng, 2021. "Omnichannel retail move in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 936-950.
    17. Shao, Jing & Yang, Hangjun & Xing, Xiaoqiang & Yang, Liu, 2016. "E-commerce and traffic congestion: An economic and policy analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 91-103.
    18. Matsui, Kenji, 2016. "Asymmetric product distribution between symmetric manufacturers using dual-channel supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 646-657.
    19. Elahi, Hamid & Pun, Hubert & Ghamat, Salar, 2023. "The Impact of Capacity Information on Supplier Encroachment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    20. Qing, Qiankai & Deng, Tianhu & Wang, Hongwei, 2017. "Capacity allocation under downstream competition and bargaining," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 97-107.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:17:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-016-9238-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.