IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/dyngam/v6y2016i4d10.1007_s13235-015-0168-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mean-Field Game Approach to Admission Control of an M/M/ $$\infty $$ ∞ Queue with Shared Service Cost

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Więcek

    (Wrocław University of Technology)

  • Eitan Altman

    (INRIA Sophia Antipolis)

  • Arnob Ghosh

    (University of Pennsylvania)

Abstract

We study a mean-field approximation of the M/M/ $$\infty $$ ∞ queueing system. The problem we deal is quite different from standard games of congestion as we consider the case in which higher congestion results in smaller costs per user. This is motivated by a situation in which some TV show is broadcast so that the same cost is needed no matter how many users follow the show. Using a mean-field approximation, we show that this results in multiple equilibria of threshold type which we explicitly compute. We further derive the social optimal policy and compute the price of anarchy. We then study the game with partial information and show that by appropriate limitation of the queue-state information obtained by the players, we can obtain the same performance as when all the information is available to the players. We show that the mean-field approximation becomes tight as the workload increases, thus the results obtained for the mean-field model well approximate the discrete one.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Więcek & Eitan Altman & Arnob Ghosh, 2016. "Mean-Field Game Approach to Admission Control of an M/M/ $$\infty $$ ∞ Queue with Shared Service Cost," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 538-566, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:dyngam:v:6:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s13235-015-0168-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s13235-015-0168-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13235-015-0168-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13235-015-0168-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uri Yechiali, 1971. "On Optimal Balking Rules and Toll Charges in the GI / M /1 Queuing Process," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 349-370, April.
    2. Eitan Altman & Nahum Shimkin, 1998. "Individual Equilibrium and Learning in Processor Sharing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 776-784, December.
    3. Shaler Stidham & Richard R. Weber, 1989. "Monotonic and Insensitive Optimal Policies for Control of Queues with Undiscounted Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 611-625, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghosh, Souvik & Hassin, Refael, 2021. "Inefficiency in stochastic queueing systems with strategic customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 1-11.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pengfei Guo & Refael Hassin, 2011. "Strategic Behavior and Social Optimization in Markovian Vacation Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 986-997, August.
    2. A.C. Brooms, 2004. "On the Nash equilibria for the FCFS queueing system with load-increasing service rate," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 0407, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.
    3. Xuanming Su & Stefanos Zenios, 2004. "Patient Choice in Kidney Allocation: The Role of the Queueing Discipline," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 280-301, June.
    4. Refael Hassin & Ran I. Snitkovsky, 2020. "Social and Monopoly Optimization in Observable Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 1178-1198, July.
    5. E. J. Collins & A. C. Brooms, 2005. "The Bernoulli Feedback Queue with Balking: Stochastic Order Results and Equilibrium Joining Rules," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 0517, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.
    6. Erim Kardeş & Fernando Ordóñez & Randolph W. Hall, 2011. "Discounted Robust Stochastic Games and an Application to Queueing Control," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 365-382, April.
    7. De Munck, Thomas & Chevalier, Philippe & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien, 2023. "Managing priorities on on-demand service platforms with waiting time differentiation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    8. Balachandran, Kashi R. & Radhakrishnan, Suresh, 1996. "Cost of congestion, operational efficiency and management accounting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 237-245, March.
    9. Fajardo, Val Andrei & Drekic, Steve, 2015. "Controlling the workload of M/G/1 queues via the q-policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 607-617.
    10. Parlakturk, Ali & Kumar, Sunil, 2004. "Self-Interested Routing in Queueing Networks," Research Papers 1782r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    11. Delasay, Mohammad & Ingolfsson, Armann & Kolfal, Bora & Schultz, Kenneth, 2019. "Load effect on service times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 673-686.
    12. Refael Hassin & Ricky Roet-Green, 2017. "The Impact of Inspection Cost on Equilibrium, Revenue, and Social Welfare in a Single-Server Queue," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 804-820, June.
    13. van Ackere, Ann, 1995. "Capacity management: Pricing strategy, performance and the role of information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 89-100, June.
    14. Ety Zohar & Avishai Mandelbaum & Nahum Shimkin, 2002. "Adaptive Behavior of Impatient Customers in Tele-Queues: Theory and Empirical Support," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 566-583, April.
    15. John Duffy & Andreas Blume & Ted Temzelides, 2006. "Self-Organized Criticality in a Dynamic Game," Working Paper 276, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, revised Dec 2009.
    16. Shu Zhang & Jeffrey W. Ohlmann & Barrett W. Thomas, 2018. "Dynamic Orienteering on a Network of Queues," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 691-706, June.
    17. Zhang, Shu & Ohlmann, Jeffrey W. & Thomas, Barrett W., 2014. "A priori orienteering with time windows and stochastic wait times at customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 70-79.
    18. Mark Fackrell & Peter Taylor & Jiesen Wang, 2021. "Strategic customer behavior in an M/M/1 feedback queue," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 223-259, April.
    19. Bradley, James R., 2005. "Optimal control of a dual service rate M/M/1 production-inventory model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(3), pages 812-837, March.
    20. Cripps, Martin W. & Thomas, Caroline D., 2019. "Strategic experimentation in queues," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(2), May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:dyngam:v:6:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s13235-015-0168-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.