IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v45y2022i7d10.1007_s40264-022-01190-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Prediction of Adverse Event Probability Due to Pharmacokinetic Interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Tod

    (Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
    Université Lyon 1
    Université Lyon 1)

  • Thomas Rodier

    (Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse)

  • Marine Auffret

    (Université Lyon 1
    Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Pharmacotoxicologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon)

Abstract

Introduction Iatrogeny due to drug–drug interactions is insufficiently documented, due to the high number of possible combinations. Objective This study aimed to design a simple but general method to predict the variation of adverse events (AE) frequency due to a pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction. Methods Three prediction models were designed using a logistic probability density function. Each prediction model was based on three components: the AE odds ratio of each drug in the combination, and the area under the curve ratio (Rauc) of the pharmacokinetic interaction, if any. Pharmacodynamic interaction was assumed to be additive on logit scale. Rauc was predicted using a well-validated mechanistic static model, freely available online. No combination study is required. The method was evaluated against a wide range of AEs (28 High Level Terms) and 211 drug combinations (involving 43 victim drugs and 55 perpetrators), by comparing the observed and predicted frequencies. The observed odds ratios were estimated with a disproportionality analysis from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, using an approach that minimizes biases. Results With the best model, the rate of prediction considered as correct (within 50–200% of the observed value) was 72%, and the bias was negligible (-5%). The AE odds ratio due to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions was equally well predicted. Conclusions A simple workflow to implement the method in practice is proposed. This method may help to foresee and to anticipate the harmful consequences associated with drug–drug interactions, at virtually no experimental cost, when the odds ratio of an AE is known for each drug alone and the AUC ratio is known or predicted by a suitable model.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Tod & Thomas Rodier & Marine Auffret, 2022. "Quantitative Prediction of Adverse Event Probability Due to Pharmacokinetic Interactions," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 45(7), pages 755-764, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01190-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01190-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-022-01190-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-022-01190-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, Gary & Nielsen, Richard, 2019. "Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 435-454, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N'dri, Lasme Mathieu & Kakinaka, Makoto, 2020. "Financial inclusion, mobile money, and individual welfare: The case of Burkina Faso," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).
    2. Christophe Loussouarn & Carine Franc & Yann Videau & Julien Mousquès, 2021. "Can General Practitioners Be More Productive? The Impact of Teamwork and Cooperation with Nurses on GP Activities," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 680-698, March.
    3. Bryan Roberts & Fynnwin Prager & Charles Baschnagel & Adam Rose & Brett Shears, 2021. "The economic benefits of trade facilitation: U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Centers of Excellence and Expertise programme," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 346-366, February.
    4. Philipp vom Berge & Achim Schmillen, 2023. "Effects of mass layoffs on local employment—evidence from geo-referenced data," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 509-539.
    5. Takahashi, Ryo, 2021. "How to stimulate environmentally friendly consumption: Evidence from a nationwide social experiment in Japan to promote eco-friendly coffee," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    6. Camboni, Riccardo & Corsini, Alberto & Miniaci, Raffaele & Valbonesi, Paola, 2021. "Mapping fuel poverty risk at the municipal level. A small-scale analysis of Italian Energy Performance Certificate, census and survey data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Badruddoza, Syed & Amin, Modhurima Dey, 2023. "Impacts of Teaching Modality on U.S. COVID-19 Spread in Fall 2020 Semester," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 5(1), January.
    8. Harleman, Max & Weber, Jeremy G., 2023. "Can Collective Action Institutions Outperform the State? Evidence from Treatment of Abandoned Mine Drainage," MPRA Paper 119861, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Dolores Añón Higón & Ioannis Bournakis, 2024. "Participation in global value chains (GVCs) and markups: firm evidence from six European countries," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 515-539, May.
    10. NISHIHATA Masaya & TAHARA Hidenori & KOBAYASHI Yohei, 2023. "Does Sending Teachers Abroad Enhance Their Quality and Ability?," Discussion papers 23055, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    11. Florian Gunsilius & Yuliang Xu, 2021. "Matching for causal effects via multimarginal unbalanced optimal transport," Papers 2112.04398, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    12. Akoh Fabien Yao & Maxime Sèbe & Laura Recuero Virto & Abdelhak Nassiri & Hervé Dumez, 2024. "The effect of LNG bunkering on port competitiveness using multilevel data analysis [L'effet du soutage par GNL sur la compétitivité des ports à l'aide de l'analyse de données à plusieurs niveaux]," Post-Print hal-04611804, HAL.
    13. Gavious, Ilanit & Livne, Gilad & Chen, Ester, 2022. "Does tax avoidance increase or decrease when tax enforcement is stronger? Evidence using CSR heterogeneity perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    14. Alloush, Mo & Bloem, Jeffrey R., 2022. "Neighborhood violence, poverty, and psychological well-being," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Muhammad Farhan Malik & Yuan George Shan & Jamie Yixing Tong, 2022. "Do auditors price litigious tone?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1715-1760, April.
    16. Zixuan He & Xiangming Fang & Nathan Rose & Xiaodong Zheng & Scott Rozelle, 2021. "Rural minimum living standard guarantee (rural Dibao) program boosts children's education outcomes in rural China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 54-77, January.
    17. Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman Bhuiyan & Keshav Lall Maharjan, 2022. "Impact of Farmer Field School on Crop Income, Agroecology, and Farmer’s Behavior in Farming: A Case Study on Cumilla District in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Pates, Nicholas J. & Kim, GwanSeon & Mark, Tyler B. & Ritter, Matthias, 2020. "Windfalls or wind falls? The Local Effects of Turbine Development on US Agricultural Land Values," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304611, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Qi Guo & Lawrence Kryzanowski & Mingyang Li & Jie Zhang, 2021. "Share‐loan pledging and relaxation of share‐repurchase restrictions in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(5), pages 5925-5964, December.
    20. Grace Sum & Silvia Yu Hui Sim & Junxing Chay & Soon Hoe Ho & Mimaika Luluina Ginting & Zoe Zon Be Lim & Joanne Yoong & Chek Hooi Wong, 2023. "An Integrated Patient-Centred Medical Home (PCMH) Care Model Reduces Prospective Healthcare Utilisation for Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Complex Needs: A Matched Observational Study in Singapo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(19), pages 1-15, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:45:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s40264-022-01190-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.