IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v42y2019i11d10.1007_s40264-019-00857-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Alogliptin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Author

Listed:
  • Kohei Kaku

    (Kawasaki Medical School)

  • Koichi Kisanuki

    (Japan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited)

  • Mari Shibata

    (Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited)

  • Takashi Oohira

    (Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited)

Abstract

The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) alogliptin is an oral, antidiabetic treatment that is approved in many countries to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), including the USA, Europe, and Japan. Alogliptin is efficacious both as monotherapy and as add-on/combination therapy with other commonly prescribed T2DM treatments, such as metformin and pioglitazone. Overall, alogliptin is well-tolerated in patients with T2DM, including older patients, those with renal and/or hepatic impairment, and those at high risk of cardiovascular events. There is a low risk of hypoglycemia, weight gain, acute pancreatitis, and gastrointestinal adverse events with alogliptin treatment, as demonstrated in long-term trials (lasting up to 4.5 years) and in a real-world setting. Additionally, alogliptin has a generally favorable or similar safety profile in comparison to other antidiabetic agents (metformin, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, α-glucosidase inhibitors, and insulin). However, further evaluation would be required to determine the mechanism and effect of alogliptin on heart failure, bullous pemphigoid, and inflammatory bowel disease. Of note, due to the ethnic diversity in the epidemiology of T2DM, alogliptin has been shown to be more efficacious in Asian patients than in non-Asian patients with T2DM, but with a similar tolerability profile. These data indicate that DPP-4is, including alogliptin, are important treatment options, especially for Asian patients with T2DM, for whom they have potential as a first-line therapy. This benefit-risk assessment aims to place alogliptin within the current armamentarium of T2DM and aid physicians when choosing optimal diabetes treatment for their patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Kohei Kaku & Koichi Kisanuki & Mari Shibata & Takashi Oohira, 2019. "Benefit-Risk Assessment of Alogliptin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(11), pages 1311-1327, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00857-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00857-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-019-00857-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-019-00857-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Health Organisation (WHO), 2016. "Global Report on Diabetes," Working Papers id:10553, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joan Gil & Paolo Li Donni & Eugenio Zucchelli, 2019. "Uncontrolled diabetes and health care utilisation: A bivariate latent Markov model approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(11), pages 1262-1276, November.
    2. Joan Gil & Antonio Sicras-Mainar & Eugenio Zucchelli, 2016. "The effects of non-adherence on health care utilisation: panel data evidence on uncontrolled diabetes," Working Papers 2016-06, FEDEA.
    3. Meeri Urite Tekanene & Masoud Mohammadnezhad & Sabiha Khan & Renita Maharaj, 2021. "Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) related to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) among Healthy Adults in Kiribati," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, May.
    4. Marcel Bilger & Mitesh Shah & Ngiap Chuan Tan & Cynthia Y. L. Tan & Filipinas G. Bundoc & Joann Bairavi & Eric A. Finkelstein, 2021. "Process- and Outcome-Based Financial Incentives to Improve Self-Management and Glycemic Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes in Singapore: A Randomized Controlled Trial," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(5), pages 555-567, September.
    5. Joan Gil & Antoni Sicras-Mainar & Eugenio Zucchelli, 2018. "Uncontrolled diabetes and health care utilisation: panel data evidence from Spain," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(6), pages 785-795, July.
    6. Sophie Relph & Trusha Patel & Louisa Delaney & Soha Sobhy & Shakila Thangaratinam, 2021. "Adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with diabetes-related microvascular disease and risks of disease progression in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Silvia Nanjala Walekhwa Hertzberg & Øystein K. Jørstad & Beáta Éva Petrovski & Ragnheidur Bragadottir & Leif Arthur Steffensen & Morten Carstens Moe & Emily A. Burger & Goran Petrovski, 2022. "Transition from Laser to Intravitreal Injections for Diabetic Retinopathy: Hospital Utilization and Costs from an Extended Healthcare Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Cherry Chay Lee Tan & Karis Kin Fong Cheng & Siew Wai Hwang & Ning Zhang & Eleanor Holroyd & Wenru Wang, 2020. "Effect of a Diabetes Self-Efficacy Enhancing Program on Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(5), pages 293-303, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00857-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.