IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/decfin/v37y2014i2p373-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio optimization for an investor with a benchmark

Author

Listed:
  • R. Korn
  • C. Lindberg

Abstract

The most common equity mandate in the financial industry is to try to outperform an externally given benchmark with known weights. The standard quantitative approach to do this is to optimize the portfolio over short time horizons consecutively, using one-period models. However, it is not clear that this approach actually yields good performance in the long run. We provide a theoretical justification to this methodology by verifying that applying the one-period benchmark-relative mean-variance portfolio, i.e., the industry standard optimal portfolio, continuously is in fact the solution to a specific continuous time portfolio optimization problem: a maximum expected utility problem for an investor who is compared against a benchmark and evaluates her performance based on exponential utility at a deterministic future date. Copyright Springer-Verlag Italia 2014

Suggested Citation

  • R. Korn & C. Lindberg, 2014. "Portfolio optimization for an investor with a benchmark," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 37(2), pages 373-384, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:decfin:v:37:y:2014:i:2:p:373-384
    DOI: 10.1007/s10203-013-0148-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10203-013-0148-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10203-013-0148-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanley R. Pliska, 1986. "A Stochastic Calculus Model of Continuous Trading: Optimal Portfolios," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 371-382, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zagst, Rudi & Kraus, Julia & Bertrand, Philippe, 2019. "Option-Based performance participation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 44-61.
    2. L. Rüschendorf & Steven Vanduffel, 2020. "On the construction of optimal payoffs," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(1), pages 129-153, June.
    3. van Staden, Pieter M. & Forsyth, Peter A. & Li, Yuying, 2024. "Across-time risk-aware strategies for outperforming a benchmark," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 776-800.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcos Escobar-Anel & Michel Kschonnek & Rudi Zagst, 2022. "Portfolio optimization: not necessarily concave utility and constraints on wealth and allocation," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 95(1), pages 101-140, February.
    2. Thai Nguyen & Mitja Stadje, 2020. "Utility maximization under endogenous pricing," Papers 2005.04312, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    3. Nicole Branger & An Chen & Antje Mahayni & Thai Nguyen, 2023. "Optimal collective investment: an analysis of individual welfare," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 17, number 5, September.
    4. Bernardo D'Auria & Jos'e Antonio Salmer'on, 2017. "Valuing the anticipative information on the stochastic short interest rates," Papers 1711.03642, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    5. Marcos Escobar-Anel, 2022. "A dynamic programming approach to path-dependent constrained portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 141-157, August.
    6. Wan-Kai Pang & Yuan-Hua Ni & Xun Li & Ka-Fai Cedric Yiu, 2013. "Continuous-time Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Stochastic Parameters," Papers 1302.6669, arXiv.org.
    7. Servaas van Bilsen & Roger J. A. Laeven & Theo E. Nijman, 2020. "Consumption and Portfolio Choice Under Loss Aversion and Endogenous Updating of the Reference Level," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 3927-3955, September.
    8. Duffie, Darrell, 2003. "Intertemporal asset pricing theory," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 11, pages 639-742, Elsevier.
    9. Christoph Czichowsky & Walter Schachermayer, 2014. "Duality Theory for Portfolio Optimisation under Transaction Costs," Papers 1408.5989, arXiv.org.
    10. L. Rüschendorf & Steven Vanduffel, 2020. "On the construction of optimal payoffs," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(1), pages 129-153, June.
    11. Junna Bi & Qingbin Meng & Yongji Zhang, 2014. "Dynamic mean-variance and optimal reinsurance problems under the no-bankruptcy constraint for an insurer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 43-59, January.
    12. Matoussi, Anis & Xing, Hao, 2018. "Convex duality for Epstein-Zin stochastic differential utility," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 82519, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Jessica A. Wachter, 2010. "Asset Allocation," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 175-206, December.
    14. Haluk Yener, 2015. "Maximizing survival, growth and goal reaching under borrowing constraints," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(12), pages 2053-2065, December.
    15. Thijs Kamma & Antoon Pelsser, 2019. "Near-Optimal Dynamic Asset Allocation in Financial Markets with Trading Constraints," Papers 1906.12317, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    16. Ye, Jinchun, 2019. "Stochastic utilities with subsistence and satiation: Optimal life insurance purchase, consumption and investment," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 193-212.
    17. Tsukasa Fujiwara, 2004. "From the Minimal Entropy Martingale Measures to the Optimal Strategies for the Exponential Utility Maximization: the Case of Geometric Lévy Processes," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 11(4), pages 367-391, December.
    18. Anis Matoussi & Hao Xing, 2016. "Convex duality for stochastic differential utility," Papers 1601.03562, arXiv.org.
    19. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5374 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Wayne King Ming Chan, 2015. "RAROC-Based Contingent Claim Valuation," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 3-2015, March.
    21. Jouini, Elyes, 2001. "Arbitrage and control problems in finance: A presentation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 167-183, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:decfin:v:37:y:2014:i:2:p:373-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.