IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v32y2017i2d10.1007_s00180-017-0721-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Targeting Bayes factors with direct-path non-equilibrium thermodynamic integration

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Grzegorczyk

    (Groningen University)

  • Andrej Aderhold

    (Glasgow University)

  • Dirk Husmeier

    (Glasgow University)

Abstract

Thermodynamic integration (TI) for computing marginal likelihoods is based on an inverse annealing path from the prior to the posterior distribution. In many cases, the resulting estimator suffers from high variability, which particularly stems from the prior regime. When comparing complex models with differences in a comparatively small number of parameters, intrinsic errors from sampling fluctuations may outweigh the differences in the log marginal likelihood estimates. In the present article, we propose a TI scheme that directly targets the log Bayes factor. The method is based on a modified annealing path between the posterior distributions of the two models compared, which systematically avoids the high variance prior regime. We combine this scheme with the concept of non-equilibrium TI to minimise discretisation errors from numerical integration. Results obtained on Bayesian regression models applied to standard benchmark data, and a complex hierarchical model applied to biopathway inference, demonstrate a significant reduction in estimator variance over state-of-the-art TI methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Grzegorczyk & Andrej Aderhold & Dirk Husmeier, 2017. "Targeting Bayes factors with direct-path non-equilibrium thermodynamic integration," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 717-761, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:32:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s00180-017-0721-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-017-0721-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-017-0721-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-017-0721-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris J. Oates & Theodore Papamarkou & Mark Girolami, 2016. "The Controlled Thermodynamic Integral for Bayesian Model Evidence Evaluation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 634-645, April.
    2. N. Friel & A. N. Pettitt, 2008. "Marginal likelihood estimation via power posteriors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(3), pages 589-607, July.
    3. Calderhead, Ben & Girolami, Mark, 2009. "Estimating Bayes factors via thermodynamic integration and population MCMC," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4028-4045, October.
    4. Chib S. & Jeliazkov I., 2001. "Marginal Likelihood From the Metropolis-Hastings Output," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 270-281, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Will Penny & Biswa Sengupta, 2016. "Annealed Importance Sampling for Neural Mass Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Chris J. Oates & Mark Girolami & Nicolas Chopin, 2017. "Control functionals for Monte Carlo integration," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(3), pages 695-718, June.
    3. Vitoratou, Silia & Ntzoufras, Ioannis & Moustaki, Irini, 2016. "Explaining the behavior of joint and marginal Monte Carlo estimators in latent variable models with independence assumptions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57685, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Spezia, Luigi, 2020. "Bayesian variable selection in non-homogeneous hidden Markov models through an evolutionary Monte Carlo method," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    5. Joshua C. C. Chan & Liana Jacobi & Dan Zhu, 2022. "An automated prior robustness analysis in Bayesian model comparison," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 583-602, April.
    6. Luigi Spezia & Andy Vinten & Roberta Paroli & Marc Stutter, 2021. "An evolutionary Monte Carlo method for the analysis of turbidity high‐frequency time series through Markov switching autoregressive models," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(8), December.
    7. Christian Aßmann & Jens Boysen-Hogrefe & Markus Pape, 2024. "Post-processing for Bayesian analysis of reduced rank regression models with orthonormality restrictions," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 108(3), pages 577-609, September.
    8. Alzahrani, Naif & Neal, Peter & Spencer, Simon E.F. & McKinley, Trevelyan J. & Touloupou, Panayiota, 2018. "Model selection for time series of count data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 33-44.
    9. Filippone, Maurizio & Sanguinetti, Guido, 2011. "Approximate inference of the bandwidth in multivariate kernel density estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3104-3122, December.
    10. Joshua C. C. Chan & Eric Eisenstat, 2015. "Marginal Likelihood Estimation with the Cross-Entropy Method," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 256-285, March.
    11. Chan, Joshua C.C. & Grant, Angelia L., 2016. "Fast computation of the deviance information criterion for latent variable models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 847-859.
    12. Heaps, Sarah E. & Boys, Richard J. & Farrow, Malcolm, 2014. "Computation of marginal likelihoods with data-dependent support for latent variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 392-401.
    13. Perrakis, Konstantinos & Ntzoufras, Ioannis & Tsionas, Efthymios G., 2014. "On the use of marginal posteriors in marginal likelihood estimation via importance sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 54-69.
    14. Liu, Xiaobin & Li, Yong & Yu, Jun & Zeng, Tao, 2022. "Posterior-based Wald-type statistics for hypothesis testing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 83-113.
    15. Ehlers, Ricardo S., 2012. "Computational tools for comparing asymmetric GARCH models via Bayes factors," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 82(5), pages 858-867.
    16. Loza-Reyes, E. & Hurn, M.A. & Robinson, A., 2014. "Classification of molecular sequence data using Bayesian phylogenetic mixture models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 81-95.
    17. Ioannis Papageorgiou & Ioannis Kontoyiannis, 2023. "The Bayesian Context Trees State Space Model for time series modelling and forecasting," Papers 2308.00913, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    18. Mathias Drton & Martyn Plummer, 2017. "A Bayesian information criterion for singular models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(2), pages 323-380, March.
    19. Takahashi, Makoto & Watanabe, Toshiaki & Omori, Yasuhiro, 2016. "Volatility and quantile forecasts by realized stochastic volatility models with generalized hyperbolic distribution," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 437-457.
    20. Hajargasht, Gholamreza & Rao, D.S. Prasada, 2019. "Multilateral index number systems for international price comparisons: Properties, existence and uniqueness," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 36-47.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:32:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s00180-017-0721-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.