IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comgts/v13y2016i2d10.1007_s10287-015-0243-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polyhedral approximation of ellipsoidal uncertainty sets via extended formulations: a computational case study

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Bärmann

    (FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Andreas Heidt

    (FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Alexander Martin

    (FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Sebastian Pokutta

    (Georgia Institute of Technology)

  • Christoph Thurner

    (FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg)

Abstract

Robust optimization is an important technique to immunize optimization problems against data uncertainty. In the case of a linear program and an ellipsoidal uncertainty set, the robust counterpart turns into a second-order cone program. In this work, we investigate the efficiency of linearizing the second-order cone constraints of the latter. This is done using the optimal linear outer-approximation approach by Ben-Tal and Nemirovski (Math Oper Res 26:193–205, 2001) from which we derive an optimal inner approximation of the second-order cone. We examine the performance of this approach on various benchmark sets including portfolio optimization instances as well as (robustified versions of) the MIPLIB and the SNDlib.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Bärmann & Andreas Heidt & Alexander Martin & Sebastian Pokutta & Christoph Thurner, 2016. "Polyhedral approximation of ellipsoidal uncertainty sets via extended formulations: a computational case study," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 151-193, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:13:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10287-015-0243-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10287-015-0243-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10287-015-0243-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10287-015-0243-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    2. Juan Pablo Vielma & Shabbir Ahmed & George L. Nemhauser, 2008. "A Lifted Linear Programming Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Mixed-Integer Conic Quadratic Programs," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 438-450, August.
    3. ,, 2000. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 287-299, April.
    4. Aharon Ben-Tal & Arkadi Nemirovski, 2001. "On Polyhedral Approximations of the Second-Order Cone," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 193-205, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreas Bärmann & Andreas Heidt & Alexander Martin & Sebastian Pokutta & Christoph Thurner, 2017. "Erratum to: Polyhedral approximation of ellipsoidal uncertainty sets via extended formulations: a computational case study," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-296, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gülpınar, Nalan & Pachamanova, Dessislava & Çanakoğlu, Ethem, 2013. "Robust strategies for facility location under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 21-35.
    2. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim & Jie Sun & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2010. "From CVaR to Uncertainty Set: Implications in Joint Chance-Constrained Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 470-485, April.
    3. Stefan Mišković, 2017. "A VNS-LP algorithm for the robust dynamic maximal covering location problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(4), pages 1011-1033, October.
    4. M. J. Naderi & M. S. Pishvaee, 2017. "Robust bi-objective macroscopic municipal water supply network redesign and rehabilitation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(9), pages 2689-2711, July.
    5. Ruiwei Jiang & Siqian Shen & Yiling Zhang, 2017. "Integer Programming Approaches for Appointment Scheduling with Random No-Shows and Service Durations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1638-1656, December.
    6. Mínguez, R. & García-Bertrand, R., 2016. "Robust transmission network expansion planning in energy systems: Improving computational performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 21-32.
    7. Dimitris Bertsimas & Agni Orfanoudaki, 2021. "Algorithmic Insurance," Papers 2106.00839, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    8. Rafael Epstein & Andres Neely & Andres Weintraub & Fernando Valenzuela & Sergio Hurtado & Guillermo Gonzalez & Alex Beiza & Mauricio Naveas & Florencio Infante & Fernando Alarcon & Gustavo Angulo & Cr, 2012. "A Strategic Empty Container Logistics Optimization in a Major Shipping Company," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 5-16, February.
    9. Zhang, Wei & (Ato) Xu, Wangtu, 2017. "Simulation-based robust optimization for the schedule of single-direction bus transit route: The design of experiment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 203-230.
    10. Enrico Bartolini & Dominik Goeke & Michael Schneider & Mengdie Ye, 2021. "The Robust Traveling Salesman Problem with Time Windows Under Knapsack-Constrained Travel Time Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 371-394, March.
    11. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    12. Hamed Mamani & Shima Nassiri & Michael R. Wagner, 2017. "Closed-Form Solutions for Robust Inventory Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1625-1643, May.
    13. Shunichi Ohmori, 2021. "A Predictive Prescription Using Minimum Volume k -Nearest Neighbor Enclosing Ellipsoid and Robust Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Hanks, Robert W. & Weir, Jeffery D. & Lunday, Brian J., 2017. "Robust goal programming using different robustness echelons via norm-based and ellipsoidal uncertainty sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 636-646.
    15. Roberto Gomes de Mattos & Fabricio Oliveira & Adriana Leiras & Abdon Baptista de Paula Filho & Paulo Gonçalves, 2019. "Robust optimization of the insecticide-treated bed nets procurement and distribution planning under uncertainty for malaria prevention and control," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1045-1078, December.
    16. Guanglei Wang & Hassan Hijazi, 2018. "Mathematical programming methods for microgrid design and operations: a survey on deterministic and stochastic approaches," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 553-608, November.
    17. Soyster, A.L. & Murphy, F.H., 2013. "A unifying framework for duality and modeling in robust linear programs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 984-997.
    18. Li, Ping & Han, Yingwei & Xia, Yong, 2016. "Portfolio optimization using asymmetry robust mean absolute deviation model," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 353-362.
    19. Lee, In Gyu & Yoon, Sang Won & Won, Daehan, 2022. "A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Support Vector Machine for Cost-Effective Group Feature Selection: Branch-Cut-and-Price Approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 1055-1068.
    20. Mohsen Jalalimajidi & SM Seyedhosseini & Ahmad Makui & Masoud Babakhani, 2018. "Developing a comprehensive model for new energy replacement in the country’s development program using a robust optimization approach," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(6), pages 868-890, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:13:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10287-015-0243-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.