IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v9y2003i1d10.1023_bcmot.0000012306.85541.8d.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Design of Post Corporation Structure Using Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Momčilo Kujačić

    (“Srbija” PTT Corporation)

  • Nebojša J. Bojović

    (University of Belgrade)

Abstract

A model for organizational design of post corporation structure is developed in this paper. Alternative organization solutions have been designed taking into account the post environment characterized by private operators' competition and development of new message transmission technologies. Criteria for organizational design have been considered as numerical and uncertain linguistic variables describes by fuzzy sets. The model has been tested on a numerical example.

Suggested Citation

  • Momčilo Kujačić & Nebojša J. Bojović, 2003. "Organizational Design of Post Corporation Structure Using Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 5-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:9:y:2003:i:1:d:10.1023_b:cmot.0000012306.85541.8d
    DOI: 10.1023/B:CMOT.0000012306.85541.8d
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000012306.85541.8d
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000012306.85541.8d?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burton, Richard M & Obel, Børge, 1977. "The multilevel approach to organizational issues of the firm--A critical review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 395-414.
    2. William J. Baumol & Tibor Fabian, 1964. "Decomposition, Pricing for Decentralization and External Economies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 1-32, September.
    3. Tim Carroll & Richard M. Burton, 2000. "Organizations and Complexity: Searching for the Edge of Chaos," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 319-337, December.
    4. Didier M. Perdu & Alexander H. Levis, 1998. "Adaptation as a Morphing Process: A Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Organizational Structures," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 5-41, March.
    5. Raymond E. Levitt & Jan Thomsen & Tore R. Christiansen & John C. Kunz & Yan Jin & Clifford Nass, 1999. "Simulating Project Work Processes and Organizations: Toward a Micro-Contingency Theory of Organizational Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(11), pages 1479-1495, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark E. Nissen, 2007. "Computational experimentation on new organizational forms: Exploring behavior and performance of Edge organizations," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 203-240, September.
    2. Jornsten, Kurt & Leisten, Rainer, 1995. "Decomposition and iterative aggregation in hierarchical and decentralised planning structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 120-141, October.
    3. Laura B. Cardinal & Scott F. Turner & Michael J. Fern & Richard M. Burton, 2011. "Organizing for Product Development Across Technological Environments: Performance Trade-offs and Priorities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 1000-1025, August.
    4. Regine Pei Tze Oh & Susan M. Sanchez & Thomas W. Lucas & Hong Wan & Mark E. Nissen, 2009. "Efficient experimental design tools for exploring large simulation models," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 237-257, September.
    5. Brian W. Kulik & Timothy Baker, 2008. "Putting the organization back into computational organization theory: a complex Perrowian model of organizational action," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 84-119, June.
    6. Biggiero, Lucio & Angelini, Pier Paolo, 2015. "Hunting scale-free properties in R&D collaboration networks: Self-organization, power-law and policy issues in the European aerospace research area," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 21-43.
    7. Timothy N. Carroll & Thomas J. Gormley & Vincent J. Bilardo & Richard M. Burton & Keith L. Woodman, 2006. "Designing a New Organization at NASA: An Organization Design Process Using Simulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 202-214, April.
    8. Charles Corbett & Frank Debets & Luk Wassenhove, 1996. "An efficient budget allocation policy for decentralisation of responsibility for site decontamination projects," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 7(3), pages 287-305, April.
    9. Truchon, Michel, 1988. "Programmation mathématique et théorie économique," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 64(2), pages 143-156, juin.
    10. Corbett, Charles J. & Debets, Frank J.C. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1995. "Decentralization of responsibility for site decontamination projects: A budget allocation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 103-119, October.
    11. Meijboom, B.R., 1983. "Decomposition-based planning procedures," Other publications TiSEM 5abab508-b9b6-4748-88f3-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Haberstroh, Martin & Wolf, Joachim, 2005. "Individuelle Autonomie in Projektteams," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 585, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    13. Ahlatcioglu, Mehmet & Tiryaki, Fatma, 2007. "Interactive fuzzy programming for decentralized two-level linear fractional programming (DTLLFP) problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 432-450, August.
    14. Sendil K. Ethiraj & Daniel Levinthal, 2009. "Hoping for A to Z While Rewarding Only A: Complex Organizations and Multiple Goals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 4-21, February.
    15. Rupak Rauniar & Greg Rawski & Donald Hudson, 2017. "Antecedents And Consequences Of Ippd Effectiveness," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-38, October.
    16. Nicolai j. Foss & Lars Frederiksen & Francesco Rullani, 2016. "Problem‐formulation and problem‐solving in self‐organized communities: How modes of communication shape project behaviors in the free open‐source software community," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(13), pages 2589-2610, December.
    17. Athanassopoulos, Antreas D., 1995. "Goal programming & data envelopment analysis (GoDEA) for target-based multi-level planning: Allocating central grants to the Greek local authorities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 535-550, December.
    18. Nasrallah, Walid F. & Qawasmeh, Suleiman J., 2009. "Comparing multi-dimensional contingency fit to financial performance of organizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(3), pages 911-921, May.
    19. Meijboom, B.R., 1986. "Planning in decentralized firms : a contribution to the theory on multilevel decisions," Other publications TiSEM 291e5a70-7bb8-4de3-be1f-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Nicolay Worren & Tore Christiansen & Kim Verner Soldal, 2020. "Using an algorithmic approach for grouping roles and sub-units," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:9:y:2003:i:1:d:10.1023_b:cmot.0000012306.85541.8d. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.