IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v144y2017i2d10.1007_s10584-017-2037-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The power of the transplant: direct assessment of climate change impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Sabine S. Nooten

    (Western Sydney University)

  • Lesley Hughes

    (Macquarie University)

Abstract

Understanding the factors that limit species distributions has become increasingly important in the face of rapid climate change. Many approaches have been used to predict responses of species and communities to new environmental challenges, including species distribution modelling, glasshouse and growth cabinet experiments, and small-scale field manipulations, all of which have both advantages and limitations. Here, we review the use of a powerful, direct method to predict how species and communities will respond to the changing climate: the field transplant experiment. We discuss how transplant experiments can elucidate the factors that limit species distributions; disentangle the role of genetic change vs. phenotypic plasticity in species’ responses; and improve understanding of the role of species interactions in driving community change. Several generalisations about potential species’ responses to climate change are emerging from these studies, including the critical role of specific life stages in response to warming trends, the role of natural enemies and new hosts in limiting or promoting adaptive capacity, and the role of niche saturation in conferring community stability at a functional guild level. Transplant experiments have also confirmed likely mechanisms of recent range shifts and highlighted the potential for some modelling exercises to overestimate future range changes. With the prospect that accelerating warming over the next few decades will increase extinction rates and accelerate ecosystem degradation, we urge researchers to utilise this powerful but underused method more widely.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabine S. Nooten & Lesley Hughes, 2017. "The power of the transplant: direct assessment of climate change impacts," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 237-255, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:144:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10584-017-2037-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-2037-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-017-2037-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-017-2037-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jake M. Alexander & Jeffrey M. Diez & Jonathan M. Levine, 2015. "Novel competitors shape species’ responses to climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 525(7570), pages 515-518, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ilaria Bernabò & Viviana Cittadino & Sandro Tripepi & Vittoria Marchianò & Sandro Piazzini & Maurizio Biondi & Mattia Iannella, 2022. "Updating Distribution, Ecology, and Hotspots for Three Amphibian Species to Set Conservation Priorities in a European Glacial Refugium," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Avery P. Hill & Christopher B. Field, 2021. "Forest fires and climate-induced tree range shifts in the western US," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Duncan D. Smith & Mark A. Adams & Amanda M. Salvi & Christopher P. Krieg & Cécile Ané & Katherine A. McCulloh & Thomas J. Givnish, 2023. "Ecophysiological adaptations shape distributions of closely related trees along a climatic moisture gradient," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Mariana García Criado & Isla H. Myers-Smith & Anne D. Bjorkman & Signe Normand & Anne Blach-Overgaard & Haydn J. D. Thomas & Anu Eskelinen & Konsta Happonen & Juha M. Alatalo & Alba Anadon-Rosell & Is, 2023. "Plant traits poorly predict winner and loser shrub species in a warming tundra biome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Shengman Lyu & Jake M. Alexander, 2022. "Competition contributes to both warm and cool range edges," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Fatih Fazlioglu & Justin S. H. Wan, 2021. "Warming matters: alpine plant responses to experimental warming," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Clinton Carbutt & Dave I. Thompson, 2021. "Mountain Watch: How LT(S)ER Is Safeguarding Southern Africa’s People and Biodiversity for a Sustainable Mountain Future," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Thomas Dorey & Léa Frachon & Loren H. Rieseberg & Julia M. Kreiner & Florian P. Schiestl, 2024. "Biotic interactions promote local adaptation to soil in plants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Sandra Garcés-Pastor & Eric Coissac & Sébastien Lavergne & Christoph Schwörer & Jean-Paul Theurillat & Peter D. Heintzman & Owen S. Wangensteen & Willy Tinner & Fabian Rey & Martina Heer & Astrid Rutz, 2022. "High resolution ancient sedimentary DNA shows that alpine plant diversity is associated with human land use and climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:144:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10584-017-2037-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.