IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v117y2013i1p1-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing ensembles of climate change scenarios for “statistical significance”

Author

Listed:
  • Hans Storch
  • Francis Zwiers

Abstract

Climate impacts and adaptation research increasingly uses ensembles of regional and local climate change scenarios. To do so, the ensembles are examined to evaluate whether they describe a systematic difference between present states (and impacts) and envisaged future states—and such differences are often characterized as being statistically significant. This term “significance” is well defined by statistical terminology as the result of a test of a null hypothesis that is applied to samples of observations that are obtained with a defined sampling strategy. However such a statistical null hypothesis may not be a well-posed problem in the context of the evaluation of climate change scenarios. Therefore, the usage of terms such “statistically significant scenario” may be misunderstood in the general discourse about the certainty of projected climate change. We propose to employ instead a simple descriptive approach for characterizing the information in an ensemble of scenarios. Physical plausibility in the light of theoretical reasoning often adds robustness to the interpretation of climate change scenarios. Copyright The Author(s) 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Hans Storch & Francis Zwiers, 2013. "Testing ensembles of climate change scenarios for “statistical significance”," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 1-9, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:117:y:2013:i:1:p:1-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-012-0551-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10584-012-0551-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-012-0551-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James M. Murphy & David M. H. Sexton & David N. Barnett & Gareth S. Jones & Mark J. Webb & Matthew Collins & David A. Stainforth, 2004. "Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(7001), pages 768-772, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Nicholls & Barbara Zanuttigh & Jean Paul Vanderlinden & Ralf Weisse & Rodolfo Silva & Susan Hanson & Siddarth Narayan & Simon Hoggart & Richard C. Thompson & Wout de Vries & Phoebe Koundouri, 2015. "Developing a Holistic Approach to Assessing and Managing Coastal Flood Risk," DEOS Working Papers 1521, Athens University of Economics and Business.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ren, Jinfu & Liu, Yang & Liu, Jiming, 2023. "Chaotic behavior learning via information tracking," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    2. Simon Gosling & Glenn McGregor & Jason Lowe, 2012. "The benefits of quantifying climate model uncertainty in climate change impacts assessment: an example with heat-related mortality change estimates," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 217-231, May.
    3. Lingcheng Li & Liping Zhang & Jun Xia & Christopher Gippel & Renchao Wang & Sidong Zeng, 2015. "Implications of Modelled Climate and Land Cover Changes on Runoff in the Middle Route of the South to North Water Transfer Project in China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(8), pages 2563-2579, June.
    4. Getachew Tegegne & Assefa M. Melesse, 2020. "Multimodel Ensemble Projection of Hydro-climatic Extremes for Climate Change Impact Assessment on Water Resources," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(9), pages 3019-3035, July.
    5. A. Kay & R. Jones, 2012. "Comparison of the use of alternative UKCP09 products for modelling the impacts of climate change on flood frequency," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 211-230, September.
    6. Hu, Xinyu & Zhao, Jinfeng & Sun, Shikun & Jia, Chengru & Zhang, Fuyao & Ma, Yizhe & Wang, Kaixuan & Wang, Yubao, 2023. "Evaluation of the temporal reconstruction methods for MODIS-based continuous daily actual evapotranspiration estimation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Simon Gosling & Jason Lowe & Glenn McGregor & Mark Pelling & Bruce Malamud, 2009. "Associations between elevated atmospheric temperature and human mortality: a critical review of the literature," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 299-341, February.
    8. baptiste perrissin fabert & Etienne Espagne & Antonin Pottier & Franck Nadaus, 2012. "Disentangling the Stern/Nordhaus controversy. Why and how do beliefs and modelling choices matter?," EcoMod2012 4270, EcoMod.
    9. Ludovic Gaudard & Jeannette Gabbi & Andreas Bauder & Franco Romerio, 2016. "Long-term Uncertainty of Hydropower Revenue Due to Climate Change and Electricity Prices," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(4), pages 1325-1343, March.
    10. Wei, Yi-Ming & Mi, Zhi-Fu & Huang, Zhimin, 2015. "Climate policy modeling: An online SCI-E and SSCI based literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 70-84.
    11. A. Lopez & E. Suckling & F. Otto & A. Lorenz & D. Rowlands & M. Allen, 2015. "Towards a typology for constrained climate model forecasts," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 15-29, September.
    12. Andrew J. Wiltshire & Gillian Kay & Jemma L. Gornall & Richard A. Betts, 2013. "The Impact of Climate, CO 2 and Population on Regional Food and Water Resources in the 2050s," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Johannes Emmerling, 2018. "Sharing Of Climate Risks Across World Regions," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Lopes, Francis M. & Conceição, Ricardo & Silva, Hugo G. & Salgado, Rui & Collares-Pereira, Manuel, 2021. "Improved ECMWF forecasts of direct normal irradiance: A tool for better operational strategies in concentrating solar power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 755-771.
    15. Jürgen Scheffran, 2008. "Adaptive management of energy transitions in long-term climate change," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 259-286, May.
    16. Tarsia, Romano, 2024. "Heterogeneous effects of weather shocks on firm economic performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124251, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Wang, Ning & Shen, Ruifang & Wen, Zongguo & De Clercq, Djavan, 2019. "Life cycle energy efficiency evaluation for coal development and utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1-11.
    18. Rick Baker & Andrew Barker & Alan Johnston & Michael Kohlhaas, 2008. "The Stern Review: an assessment of its methodology," Staff Working Papers 0801, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    19. Johannes Emmerling & Massimo Tavoni, 2018. "Climate Engineering and Abatement: A ‘flat’ Relationship Under Uncertainty," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(2), pages 395-415, February.
    20. Timothy Osborn & Craig Wallace & Ian Harris & Thomas Melvin, 2016. "Pattern scaling using ClimGen: monthly-resolution future climate scenarios including changes in the variability of precipitation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 353-369, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:117:y:2013:i:1:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.