IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/circec/v4y2024i2d10.1007_s43615-023-00316-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manufacturing Operations Scheduling Based in a Multidimensional Sustainable Manufacturing Index (SMIik)

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Angel Chica Urzola

    (University of Sinu
    Remington University)

Abstract

Many essential human needs can only be satisfied through goods and services provided by industry. The products of industry form the material basis of contemporary living standards. All nations rightly require and aspire to efficient industrial bases to satisfy changing needs (Brundtland in U N Comm 4:300 [1]). This aspiration has led nations into a race for industrialization, and this race, as well recognized by the Bruntland Report (Our Common Future, 1987), requires the permanent use of raw materials, constant increases in productivity, and generation of material goods in large quantities which have imposed a very high economic cost, as well as a heavy burden of environmental impacts (Brundtland in U N Comm 4:300 [1]). This document presents a production scheduling proposal for a manufacturing system, based on the maximization of the sustainable manufacturing index (SMIik) of each of the products to be manufactured. This model manages to develop a utility function that integrates the main dimensions that make up sustainable business development, offering a broader criterion than just economic utility as an element for making the production decision of a manufacturing system. Furthermore, it restricts this function to product demand and the capacity of the production system. In addition, it determines the existing correlation between the sustainable development (SD) dimensions, leading to the decision taken to seek a favorable correlation between them. This model makes it possible to obtain a production sequence oriented to the prioritization of those products that offer a greater contribution to business sustainability, offering, to decision-maker, a novel and synergic option to production scheduling.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Angel Chica Urzola, 2024. "Manufacturing Operations Scheduling Based in a Multidimensional Sustainable Manufacturing Index (SMIik)," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1339-1356, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:4:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s43615-023-00316-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s43615-023-00316-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43615-023-00316-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43615-023-00316-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohan Munasinghe, 2001. "Sustainable development and climate change: applying the sustainomics transdisciplinary meta-framework," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 13-55.
    2. Santagata, R. & Ripa, M. & Ulgiati, S., 2017. "An environmental assessment of electricity production from slaughterhouse residues. Linking urban, industrial and waste management systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P2), pages 175-188.
    3. Marc A. Rosen & Hossam A. Kishawy, 2012. "Sustainable Manufacturing and Design: Concepts, Practices and Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Lanka Thabrew & Debra Perrone & Alexandra Ewing & Mark Abkowitz & George Hornberger, 2018. "Using triple bottom line metrics and multi-criteria methodology in corporate settings," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(1), pages 49-63, January.
    5. Rupert J. Baumgartner & Daniela Ebner, 2010. "Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(2), pages 76-89.
    6. Eguzki Urteaga, 2009. "Las teorías económicas del desarrollo sostenible," Cuadernos de Economía - Spanish Journal of Economics and Finance, Asociación Cuadernos de Economía, vol. 32(89), pages 113-162, Mayo-Agos.
    7. Vildåsen, Sigurd Sagen & Keitsch, Martina & Fet, Annik Magerholm, 2017. "Clarifying the Epistemology of Corporate Sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 40-46.
    8. Nasser Amaitik & Ming Zhang & Zezhong Wang & Yuchun Xu & Gareth Thomson & Yiyong Xiao & Nikolaos Kolokas & Alexander Maisuradze & Oscar Garcia & Michael Peschl & Dimitrios Tzovaras, 2022. "Cost Modelling to Support Optimum Selection of Life Extension Strategy for Industrial Equipment in Smart Manufacturing," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1425-1444, December.
    9. Beemsterboer, Bart & Land, Martin & Teunter, Ruud & Bokhorst, Jos, 2017. "Integrating make-to-order and make-to-stock in job shop control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1-10.
    10. Accinelli Gamba Elvio & Fuente García José Luis de la, 2013. "Responsabilidad social corporativa, actividades empresariales y desarrollo sustentable Modelo matemático de las decisiones en la empresa," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 58(3), pages 227-248, julio-sep.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tseng, Ming-Lang & Wu, Kuo-Jui & Ma, Li & Kuo, Tsai Chi & Sai, Fuyume, 2019. "A hierarchical framework for assessing corporate sustainability performance using a hybrid fuzzy synthetic method-DEMATEL," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 524-533.
    2. Thaís Vieira Nunhes & Merce Bernardo & Otávio José de Oliveira, 2020. "Rethinking the Way of Doing Business: A Reframe of Management Structures for Developing Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, February.
    3. Andrea Cardoni & Evgeniia Kiseleva & Rosa Lombardi, 2020. "A sustainable governance model to prevent corporate corruption: Integrating anticorruption practices, corporate strategy and business processes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1173-1185, March.
    4. Zhang, XiaoLi & Liu, ChenGuang & Li, WenJuan & Evans, Steve & Yin, Yong, 2017. "Effects of key enabling technologies for seru production on sustainable performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 290-307.
    5. Alison Ashby, 2016. "From global to local: reshoring for sustainability," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 75-88, December.
    6. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Saba Sharif, 2022. "The Impact of Firm Sustainability on Firm Growth: Evidence from USA," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2014. "Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 214-222.
    8. Miethlich, Boris & Oldenburg, Anett G., 2019. "Social Inclusion Drives Business Sales: A Literature Review on the Case of the Employment of Persons With Disabilities," EconStor Conference Papers 200752, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    9. Jungmin An & Dong-Kwan Kim & Jinyeong Lee & Sung-Kwan Joo, 2021. "Least Squares Monte Carlo Simulation-Based Decision-Making Method for Photovoltaic Investment in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Andrea Lučić, 2020. "Measuring Sustainable Marketing Orientation—Scale Development Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Nurisyal Muhamad & Sofiah Md Auzair & Amizawati Mohd Amir & Md Daud Ismail, 2016. "Measuring Sustainability Performance Measurement System," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 3(12), pages 182-199, JUNE.
    12. Xilin Zhang & Yuejin Tan & Zhiwei Yang, 2018. "Rework Quantification and Influence of Rework on Duration and Cost of Equipment Development Task," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Viju Raghupathi & Jie Ren & Wullianallur Raghupathi, 2020. "Identifying Corporate Sustainability Issues by Analyzing Shareholder Resolutions: A Machine-Learning Text Analytics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Estephania Delgadillo & Tatiana Reyes & Rupert J Baumgartner, 2021. "Towards territorial product-service systems: A framework linking resources, networks and value creation," Post-Print halshs-03520232, HAL.
    15. Hariyani, Dharmendra & Mishra, Sanjeev & Hariyani, Poonam & Sharma, Milind Kumar, 2023. "Drivers and motives for sustainable manufacturing system," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(1).
    16. Ming Tang & Huchang Liao & Zhengjun Wan & Enrique Herrera-Viedma & Marc A. Rosen, 2018. "Ten Years of Sustainability (2009 to 2018): A Bibliometric Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    17. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    18. João M. Lopes & Sofia Gomes & Rosselyn Pacheco & Elizabete Monteiro & Carolina Santos, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainable Innovation Strategies for Increased Competition among Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Edgars Sedovs & Tatjana Volkova, 2024. "Sustainability: Is It a Strategic Management Research Fashion?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Anna M. Hansson & Eja Pedersen & Niklas P. E. Karlsson & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2023. "Barriers and drivers for sustainable business model innovation based on a radical farmland change scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8083-8106, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:4:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s43615-023-00316-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.