IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v27y2019i4d10.1007_s10100-018-0560-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The network data envelopment analysis models for non-homogenous decision making units based on the sun network structure

Author

Listed:
  • Qingyou Yan

    (North China Electric Power University)

  • Fei Zhao

    (North China Electric Power University)

  • Xu Wang

    (North China Electric Power University)

  • Guoliang Yang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Tomas Baležentis

    (Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics)

  • Dalia Streimikiene

    (Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics)

Abstract

This paper seeks to propose a network data envelopment analysis (DEA) framework for analysis of heterogeneous systems. The paper introduces the dummy connector so that every network structure can be transformed into the sun network structure. In his case, the dummy connector allows for heterogeneity of the decision making units (DMUs) in terms of their inner structure. Based on the sun network structure, the static and dynamic network DEA models are established. Thus, DMUs with different structures can be evaluated according to the static and dynamic network DEA models. The efficiency of each sub-unit, each period and each sub-unit in each period can also be obtained. Two simulated examples are presented using the static and dynamic DEA models.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingyou Yan & Fei Zhao & Xu Wang & Guoliang Yang & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "The network data envelopment analysis models for non-homogenous decision making units based on the sun network structure," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(4), pages 1221-1244, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:27:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10100-018-0560-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-018-0560-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10100-018-0560-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-018-0560-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Q L Wei & T-S Chang, 2011. "Optimal system design series-network DEA models," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(6), pages 1109-1119, June.
    2. Magdalena Kapelko, 2018. "Measuring inefficiency for specific inputs using data envelopment analysis: evidence from construction industry in Spain and Portugal," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(1), pages 43-66, March.
    3. Du, Juan & Liang, Liang & Chen, Yao & Cook, Wade D. & Zhu, Joe, 2011. "A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 390-397, April.
    4. Chen, Chialin & Zhu, Joe & Yu, Jiun-Yu & Noori, Hamid, 2012. "A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 348-359.
    5. Chen, Yao & Cook, Wade D. & Zhu, Joe, 2010. "Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 138-142, April.
    6. Guo, Chuanyin & Abbasi Shureshjani, Roohollah & Foroughi, Ali Asghar & Zhu, Joe, 2017. "Decomposition weights and overall efficiency in two-stage additive network DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 896-906.
    7. Zhu, Joe, 2000. "Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 105-124, May.
    8. Chen, Yao & Cook, Wade D. & Kao, Chiang & Zhu, Joe, 2013. "Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 507-515.
    9. Li, Haitao & Chen, Chialin & Cook, Wade D. & Zhang, Jinlong & Zhu, Joe, 2018. "Two-stage network DEA: Who is the leader?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 15-19.
    10. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    11. Mehdi Toloo & Soroosh Nalchigar & Babak Sohrabi, 2018. "Selecting most efficient information system projects in presence of user subjective opinions: a DEA approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(4), pages 1027-1051, December.
    12. Fare, R. & Grabowski, R. & Grosskopf, S. & Kraft, S., 1997. "Efficiency of a fixed but allocatable input: A non-parametric approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 187-193, October.
    13. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2009. "Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 243-252, August.
    14. Josef Jablonsky, 2018. "Ranking of countries in sporting events using two-stage data envelopment analysis models: a case of Summer Olympic Games 2016," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(4), pages 951-966, December.
    15. G. Villa & S. Lozano, 2018. "Dynamic Network DEA approach to basketball games efficiency," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(11), pages 1738-1750, November.
    16. Lawrence M. Seiford & Joe Zhu, 1999. "Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(9), pages 1270-1288, September.
    17. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    18. Song, Malin & Peng, Jun & Wang, Jianlin & Zhao, Jiajia, 2018. "Environmental efficiency and economic growth of China: A Ray slack-based model analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 51-63.
    19. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    20. Emrouznejad, Ali & Parker, Barnett R. & Tavares, Gabriel, 2008. "Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 151-157, September.
    21. Seiford, Lawrence M. & Zhu, Joe, 1999. "An investigation of returns to scale in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 1-11, February.
    22. Cook, Wade D. & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Joe, 2010. "Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 423-430, December.
    23. Mahdiloo, Mahdi & Toloo, Mehdi & Duong, Thach-Thao & Farzipoor Saen, Reza & Tatham, Peter, 2018. "Integrated data envelopment analysis: Linear vs. nonlinear model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 255-267.
    24. Lim, Sungmook & Zhu, Joe, 2013. "Integrated data envelopment analysis: Global vs. local optimum," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 276-278.
    25. Park, K. Sam & Park, Kwangtae, 2009. "Measurement of multiperiod aggregative efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 567-580, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lívia Torres & Francisco S. Ramos, 2024. "Allocating Benefits Due to Shared Resources Using Shapley Value and Nucleolus in Dynamic Network Data Envelopment Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Luda Zhao & Bin Wang & Congyong Shen, 2021. "A multi-objective scheduling method for operational coordination time using improved triangular fuzzy number representation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-31, June.
    3. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) for the Assessment of Renewable Energy Technologies in a Household: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    2. Qingyou Yan & Youwei Wan & Jingye Yuan & Jieting Yin & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2017. "Economic and Technical Efficiency of the Biomass Industry in China: A Network Data Envelopment Analysis Model Involving Externalities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Chen, Ya & Li, Yongjun & Liang, Liang & Salo, Ahti & Wu, Huaqing, 2016. "Frontier projection and efficiency decomposition in two-stage processes with slacks-based measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 543-554.
    4. Tatiana Bencova & Andrea Bohacikova, 2022. "DEA in Performance Measurement of Two-Stage Processes: Comparative Overview of the Literature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 111-129.
    5. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2016. "Research fronts in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    6. Suvvari Anandarao & S. Raja Sethu Durai & Phanindra Goyari, 2019. "Efficiency Decomposition in two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis: An application to Life Insurance companies in India," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(2), pages 271-285, June.
    7. Li, Yongjun & Liu, Jin & Ang, Sheng & Yang, Feng, 2021. "Performance evaluation of two-stage network structures with fixed-sum outputs: An application to the 2018winter Olympic Games," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Chu, Junfei & Zhu, Joe, 2021. "Production scale-based two-stage network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 283-294.
    9. Li, Xiang, 2017. "A fair evaluation of certain stage in a two-stage structure: revisiting the typical two-stage DEA approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 155-167.
    10. AGRELL, Per & HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel, 2011. "Frontier-based performance analysis models for supply chain management; state of the art and research directions," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2011069, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    11. Ming-Fu Hsu & Ying-Shao Hsin & Fu-Jiing Shiue, 2022. "Business analytics for corporate risk management and performance improvement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 629-669, August.
    12. Khoveyni, Mohammad & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Eslami, Robabeh & Yang, Guo-liang, 2019. "Variations effect of intermediate products on the second stage in two-stage processes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 35-48.
    13. Tavakoli, Ibrahim M. & Mostafaee, Amin, 2019. "Free disposal hull efficiency scores of units with network structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1027-1036.
    14. Svetlana V. Ratner & Artem M. Shaposhnikov & Andrey V. Lychev, 2023. "Network DEA and Its Applications (2017–2022): A Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Zhang, Linyan & Chen, Kun, 2019. "Hierarchical network systems: An application to high-technology industry in China," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 118-131.
    16. Lim, Sungmook & Zhu, Joe, 2016. "A note on two-stage network DEA model: Frontier projection and duality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 342-346.
    17. An, Qingxian & Chen, Haoxun & Xiong, Beibei & Wu, Jie & Liang, Liang, 2017. "Target intermediate products setting in a two-stage system with fairness concern," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 49-59.
    18. Wu, Huaqing & Lv, Kui & Liang, Liang & Hu, Hanhui, 2017. "Measuring performance of sustainable manufacturing with recyclable wastes: A case from China’s iron and steel industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 38-47.
    19. Ang, Sheng & Chen, Chien-Ming, 2016. "Pitfalls of decomposition weights in the additive multi-stage DEA model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 139-153.
    20. Haitao Li & Jie Xiong & Jianhui Xie & Zhongbao Zhou & Jinlong Zhang, 2019. "A Unified Approach to Efficiency Decomposition for a Two-Stage Network DEA Model with Application of Performance Evaluation in Banks and Sustainable Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:27:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10100-018-0560-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.