IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v21y2013i3p561-583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cooperative value in a multiplicative model

Author

Abstract

In this study, we consider positive cooperative TU games with finitely many players. We assume that all agents use the same scale. Furthermore, the worth that a coalition of players can achieve by cooperation is measured as a multiple of a defined standard base. In this multiplicative setting we characterise and analyse a solution concept which is related to the well known Shapley value. From a statistical point of view, the methodology allows computing relative importance of individual factors on the expected value. In particular, we present a specific application to general insurance pricing. As a result, the value may be used to analyse the business mix of an insurance portfolio by measuring exposure to risk factors. Similar applications refer to credit scoring and customer relationship management. In this sense, the modelling approach may be embedded as a risk analysis technique within a risk management framework. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Karl Ortmann, 2013. "A cooperative value in a multiplicative model," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 21(3), pages 561-583, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:21:y:2013:i:3:p:561-583
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-012-0247-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10100-012-0247-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-012-0247-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tijs, S.H. & Otten, G.J.M., 1993. "Compromise values in cooperative game theory," Research Memorandum FEW 615, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Conklin, Michael & Powaga, Ken & Lipovetsky, Stan, 2004. "Customer satisfaction analysis: Identification of key drivers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(3), pages 819-827, May.
    3. Tijs, S.H. & Otten, G.J.M., 1993. "Compromise values in cooperative game theory," Other publications TiSEM 0f7c6f08-1cec-4b83-942a-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. K. Michael Ortmann, 2000. "The proportional value for positive cooperative games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 51(2), pages 235-248, April.
    5. Jean Derks & Gerard Laan & Valery Vasil’ev, 2006. "Characterizations of the Random Order Values by Harsanyi Payoff Vectors," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 64(1), pages 155-163, August.
    6. Sergiu Hart, 2006. "Shapley Value," Discussion Paper Series dp421, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    7. Marc Ryser & Stefan Denzler, 2009. "Selecting credit rating models: a cross-validation-based comparison of discriminatory power," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 23(2), pages 187-203, June.
    8. Emilio Calvo, 2008. "Random marginal and random removal values," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 37(4), pages 533-563, December.
    9. K. Ortmann, 1998. "Conservation of energy in value theory," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 47(3), pages 423-449, October.
    10. Hart, Sergiu & Mas-Colell, Andreu, 1989. "Potential, Value, and Consistency," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 589-614, May.
    11. Faigle, U & Kern, W, 1992. "The Shapley Value for Cooperative Games under Precedence Constraints," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 21(3), pages 249-266.
    12. Tijs, S.H. & Otten, G.J.M., 1993. "Compromise values in cooperative game theory," Other publications TiSEM 59116a16-eeef-4571-9c8d-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Monderer, Dov & Samet, Dov, 2002. "Variations on the shapley value," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 54, pages 2055-2076, Elsevier.
    14. Anna B. Khmelnitskaya & Theo S. H. Driessen, 2003. "Semiproportional values for TU games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 57(3), pages 495-511, August.
    15. Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2000. "A note on compromise values," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 51(3), pages 471-478, August.
    16. Xiaotie Deng & Christos H. Papadimitriou, 1994. "On the Complexity of Cooperative Solution Concepts," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 257-266, May.
    17. J.R. Fernández & E. Algaba & J.M. Bilbao & A. Jiménez & N. Jiménez & J.J. López, 2002. "Generating Functions for Computing the Myerson Value," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 143-158, January.
    18. Stef Tijs & Gert-Jan Otten, 1993. "Compromise values in cooperative game theory," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 1(1), pages 1-36, December.
    19. Annick Laruelle & Federico Valenciano, 2008. "Potential, value, and coalition formation," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 73-89, July.
    20. L C Thomas & R W Oliver & D J Hand, 2005. "A survey of the issues in consumer credit modelling research," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(9), pages 1006-1015, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barış Bülent Kırlar & Serap Ergün & Sırma Zeynep Alparslan Gök & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber, 2018. "A game-theoretical and cryptographical approach to crypto-cloud computing and its economical and financial aspects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 260(1), pages 217-231, January.
    2. Herrero, Carmen & Maschler, Michael & Villar, Antonio, 1999. "Individual rights and collective responsibility: the rights-egalitarian solution," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 59-77, January.
    3. Judith Timmer, 2006. "The Compromise Value for Cooperative Games with Random Payoffs," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 64(1), pages 95-106, August.
    4. Béal, Sylvain & Ferrières, Sylvain & Rémila, Eric & Solal, Philippe, 2018. "The proportional Shapley value and applications," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 93-112.
    5. Branzei, Rodica & Dimitrov, Dinko & Tijs, Stef, 2004. "Hypercubes and compromise values for cooperative fuzzy games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 733-740, June.
    6. Fukuda, E. & Tijs, S.H. & Brânzei, R. & Muto, S., 2002. "Compromising in Partition Function Form Games and Cooperation in Perfect Extensive Form," Other publications TiSEM 9374032a-efac-43dd-a3db-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Timmer, J.B., 2000. "The Compromise Value for Cooperative Games with Random Payoffs," Discussion Paper 2000-98, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    8. Fukuda, E. & Tijs, S.H. & Brânzei, R. & Muto, S., 2002. "Compromising in Partition Function Form Games and Cooperation in Perfect Extensive Form," Discussion Paper 2002-117, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    9. Timmer, J.B., 2000. "The Compromise Value for Cooperative Games with Random Payoffs," Other publications TiSEM 08aefe4e-00a8-4e58-9e54-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Timmer, J.B., 2001. "Cooperative behaviour, uncertainty and operations research," Other publications TiSEM 4a00d965-b7c4-4f43-8f76-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Casas-Mendez, Balbina & Garcia-Jurado, Ignacio & van den Nouweland, Anne & Vazquez-Brage, Margarita, 2003. "An extension of the [tau]-value to games with coalition structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(3), pages 494-513, August.
    12. Benjamin R. Auer & Tobias Hiller, 2021. "Cost gap, Shapley, or nucleolus allocation: Which is the best game‐theoretic remedy for the low‐risk anomaly?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 876-884, June.
    13. Fragnelli, Vito & Garcia-Jurado, Ignacio & Mendez-Naya, Luciano, 2004. "A note on bus games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 99-106, January.
    14. Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2008. "Comments on: Transversality of the Shapley value," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 54-57, July.
    15. Jan Libich & Dat Thanh Nguyen, 2022. "When a compromise gets compromised by another compromise," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 678-716, December.
    16. Zhengxing Zou & René Brink & Youngsub Chun & Yukihiko Funaki, 2021. "Axiomatizations of the proportional division value," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(1), pages 35-62, July.
    17. Gustavo Bergantiños & Luciano Méndez-Naya, 2000. "Implementation of the τ-value," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 8(1), pages 31-41, June.
    18. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2005. "The Consistent Coalitional Value," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 832-851, November.
    19. Zhengxing Zou & Qiang Zhang, 2018. "Harsanyi power solution for games with restricted cooperation," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 26-47, January.
    20. Frank Huettner, 2015. "A proportional value for cooperative games with a coalition structure," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 78(2), pages 273-287, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:21:y:2013:i:3:p:561-583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.