IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/bioerq/v2y2017i4d10.1007_s41247-017-0030-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Farm-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Oilseed Feedstocks in the Northern Great Plains

Author

Listed:
  • Devin Moeller

    (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology)

  • Heidi L. Sieverding

    (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology)

  • James J. Stone

    (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology)

Abstract

Second generation biofuel feedstocks such as carinata (Brassica carinata L. Braun) and camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) offer unique advantages over traditional bioenergy alternatives, such as canola (Brassica napus L.) or soybean (Glycine max L. Merr). As the global demand for food and livestock feed continues grow, the utility of canola and soybeans as a bioenergy resource is uncertain. This work focused on two oilseed alternatives for use as biofuel feedstocks across the semi-arid region of the Northern Great Plains. This analysis compared the geographic distribution of current yields, assessed the environmental impacts, and evaluated the energetic benefit of oilseed production at aggregated crop management zone levels through a life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The average regional LCA results for environmental and energetic impacts for carinata and camelina compared favorably to canola and soybeans and were found to represent sustainable biofuel feedstock alternatives for the study region. The estimated climate change impact of carinata and camelina offered a substantial benefit over that of canola and soybeans. The regional results for freshwater and marine eutrophication potential and the net energy results of carinata and camelina also compared favorably to canola and soybeans. The most environmentally and energetically beneficial feedstock varied based on geographic location within the region. Soybeans tended to perform well in southeastern South Dakota, canola performed well in northeastern North Dakota, and camelina and carinata remained strong alternatives comparatively across the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Devin Moeller & Heidi L. Sieverding & James J. Stone, 2017. "Comparative Farm-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Oilseed Feedstocks in the Northern Great Plains," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:bioerq:v:2:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s41247-017-0030-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s41247-017-0030-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41247-017-0030-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41247-017-0030-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J. Murphy & Michael Carbajales-Dale & Devin Moeller, 2016. "Comparing Apples to Apples: Why the Net Energy Analysis Community Needs to Adopt the Life-Cycle Analysis Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    2. MacWilliam, Susan & Sanscartier, David & Lemke, Reynald & Wismer, Monique & Baron, Vern, 2016. "Environmental benefits of canola production in 2010 compared to 1990: A life cycle perspective," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 106-115.
    3. Seungdo Kim & Bruce E. Dale, 2003. "Cumulative Energy and Global Warming Impact from the Production of Biomass for Biobased Products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 7(3‐4), pages 147-162, July.
    4. Escobar, José C. & Lora, Electo S. & Venturini, Osvaldo J. & Yáñez, Edgar E. & Castillo, Edgar F. & Almazan, Oscar, 2009. "Biofuels: Environment, technology and food security," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(6-7), pages 1275-1287, August.
    5. Gui, M.M. & Lee, K.T. & Bhatia, S., 2008. "Feasibility of edible oil vs. non-edible oil vs. waste edible oil as biodiesel feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1646-1653.
    6. Charles A.S. Hall & Bruce E. Dale & David Pimentel, 2011. "Seeking to Understand the Reasons for Different Energy Return on Investment (EROI) Estimates for Biofuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(12), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masum, Farhad Hossain & Coppola, Ed & Field, John L. & Geller, Daniel & George, Sheeja & Miller, Jonathan L. & Mulvaney, Michael J. & Nana, Sanjay & Seepaul, Ramdeo & Small, Ian M. & Wright, David & D, 2023. "Supply chain optimization of sustainable aviation fuel from carinata in the Southeastern United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Anda Fridrihsone & Francesco Romagnoli & Ugis Cabulis, 2020. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Rapeseed and Rapeseed Oil Produced in Northern Europe: A Latvian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Rabiee, Mohammad & Majidian, Majid & Alizadeh, Mohammad Reza & Kavoosi, Masoud, 2021. "Evaluation of energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emission in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) production in paddy fields of Guilan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Piernicola Masella & Incoronata Galasso, 2020. "A Comparative Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Study of Bio-Energy Feedstock from Camelina sativa , an Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salehi, Mohammad & Khajehpour, Hossein & Saboohi, Yadollah, 2020. "Extended Energy Return on Investment of multiproduct energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Mardhiah, H. Haziratul & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Masjuki, H.H. & Lim, Steven & Lee, H.V., 2017. "A review on latest developments and future prospects of heterogeneous catalyst in biodiesel production from non-edible oils," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1225-1236.
    3. Delannoy, Louis & Longaretti, Pierre-Yves & Murphy, David J. & Prados, Emmanuel, 2021. "Peak oil and the low-carbon energy transition: A net-energy perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    4. Rincón, L.E. & Jaramillo, J.J. & Cardona, C.A., 2014. "Comparison of feedstocks and technologies for biodiesel production: An environmental and techno-economic evaluation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 479-487.
    5. Bardhan, Soubhik K. & Gupta, Shelaka & Gorman, M.E. & Haider, M. Ali, 2015. "Biorenewable chemicals: Feedstocks, technologies and the conflict with food production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 506-520.
    6. Mansir, Nasar & Teo, Siow Hwa & Rashid, Umer & Saiman, Mohd Izham & Tan, Yen Ping & Alsultan, G. Abdulkareem & Taufiq-Yap, Yun Hin, 2018. "Modified waste egg shell derived bifunctional catalyst for biodiesel production from high FFA waste cooking oil. A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3645-3655.
    7. Bateni, Hamed & Karimi, Keikhosro & Zamani, Akram & Benakashani, Fatemeh, 2014. "Castor plant for biodiesel, biogas, and ethanol production with a biorefinery processing perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 14-22.
    8. Sarin, Amit & Singh, N.P. & Sarin, Rakesh & Malhotra, R.K., 2010. "Natural and synthetic antioxidants: Influence on the oxidative stability of biodiesel synthesized from non-edible oil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4645-4648.
    9. Hendrik Lambrecht & Steffen Lewerenz & Heidi Hottenroth & Ingela Tietze & Tobias Viere, 2020. "Ecological Scarcity Based Impact Assessment for a Decentralised Renewable Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Bharathiraja, B. & Jayamuthunagai, J. & Sudharsanaa, T. & Bharghavi, A. & Praveenkumar, R. & Chakravarthy, M. & Yuvaraj, D., 2017. "Biobutanol – An impending biofuel for future: A review on upstream and downstream processing tecniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 788-807.
    11. Zeke Marshall & Paul E. Brockway, 2020. "A Net Energy Analysis of the Global Agriculture, Aquaculture, Fishing and Forestry System," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27, June.
    12. Leung, Dennis Y.C. & Wu, Xuan & Leung, M.K.H., 2010. "A review on biodiesel production using catalyzed transesterification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1083-1095, April.
    13. Sarin, Amit & Arora, Rajneesh & Singh, N.P. & Sharma, Meeta & Malhotra, R.K., 2009. "Influence of metal contaminants on oxidation stability of Jatropha biodiesel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1271-1275.
    14. Li, Zhuoxue & Yang, Depo & Huang, Miaoling & Hu, Xinjun & Shen, Jiangang & Zhao, Zhimin & Chen, Jianping, 2012. "Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius) larvae: A new biodiesel resource," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 349-354.
    15. José Hidalgo-Crespo & César I. Alvarez-Mendoza & Manuel Soto & Jorge Luis Amaya-Rivas, 2022. "Towards a Circular Economy Development for Household Used Cooking Oil in Guayaquil: Quantification, Characterization, Modeling, and Geographical Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Tiziano Gomiero, 2015. "Are Biofuels an Effective and Viable Energy Strategy for Industrialized Societies? A Reasoned Overview of Potentials and Limits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-31, June.
    17. M. Mofijur & F. Kusumo & I. M. Rizwanul Fattah & H. M. Mahmudul & M. G. Rasul & A. H. Shamsuddin & T. M. I. Mahlia, 2020. "Resource Recovery from Waste Coffee Grounds Using Ultrasonic-Assisted Technology for Bioenergy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Cheng, Jay J. & Timilsina, Govinda R., 2011. "Status and barriers of advanced biofuel technologies: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3541-3549.
    19. D'Souza, Reena & Vats, Tripti & Chattree, Amit & Siril, Prem Felix, 2018. "Graphene supported magnetically separable solid acid catalyst for the single step conversion of waste cooking oil to biodiesel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1064-1073.
    20. Bergthorson, Jeffrey M. & Thomson, Murray J., 2015. "A review of the combustion and emissions properties of advanced transportation biofuels and their impact on existing and future engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1393-1417.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:bioerq:v:2:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s41247-017-0030-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.