IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v14y2016i3d10.1007_s40258-016-0223-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Aspects of a Sustainable Health Insurance System in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Pelster

    (Leuphana University of Lueneburg)

  • Vera Hagemann

    (Ruhr-University Bochum)

  • Franziska Laporte Uribe

    (German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases e. V. (DZNE), DZNE site Witten)

Abstract

Background The main goals of health-care systems are to improve the health of the population they serve, respond to people’s legitimate expectations, and offer fair financing. As a result, the health system in Germany is subject to continuous adaption as well as public and political discussions about its design. Objective This paper analyzes the key challenges for the German health-care system and the underlying factors driving these challenges. We aim to identify possible solutions to put the German health-care system in a better position to face these challenges. Methods We utilize a broad array of methods to answer these questions, including a review of the published and grey literature on health-care planning in Germany, semi-structured interviews with stakeholders in the system, and an online questionnaire. Results We find that the most urgent (and manageable) aspects that merit attention are holistic hospital planning, initiatives to increase (administrative) innovation in the health-care system, incentives to increase prevention, and approaches to increase analytical quality assurance. Conclusion We found that hospital planning, innovation, quality control, and prevention, are considered to be the topics most in need of attention in the German health system.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Pelster & Vera Hagemann & Franziska Laporte Uribe, 2016. "Key Aspects of a Sustainable Health Insurance System in Germany," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 293-312, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:14:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s40258-016-0223-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-016-0223-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-016-0223-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-016-0223-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael E. Porter & Clemens Guth, 2012. "Redefining German Health Care," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-10826-6, October.
    2. William D. Savedoff & Pablo Gottret, 2008. "Governing Mandatory Health Insurance : Learning from Experience," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6526.
    3. Hendrik Schmitz & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2017. "Does Price Framing Affect the Consumer Price Sensitivity of Health Plan Choice?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 52(1), pages 88-127.
    4. Ettelt, Stefanie & Fazekas, Mihaly & Mays, Nicholas & Nolte, Ellen, 2012. "Assessing health care planning – A framework-led comparison of Germany and New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 50-59.
    5. Tenbensel, Tim & Eagle, Samantha & Ashton, Toni, 2012. "Comparing health policy agendas across eleven high income countries: Islands of difference in a sea of similarity," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 29-36.
    6. Ozegowski, Susanne & Sundmacher, Leonie, 2012. "Ensuring access to health care—Germany reforms supply structures to tackle inequalities," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 105-109.
    7. Siadat, Banafsheh & Stolpe, Michael, 2005. "Reforming health care finance: What can Germany learn from other countries?," Kiel Economic Policy Papers 5, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramiro Guerrero & Sergio I. Prada & Dov Chernichovsky, 2014. "La doble descentralización en el sector salud: evaluación y alternativas de política pública," Cuadernos de Fedesarrollo 12019, Fedesarrollo.
    2. Kifmann, Mathias, 2017. "Competition policy for health care provision in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 119-125.
    3. Rudy Douven & Ron van der Heijden & Thomas McGuire & Erik Schut, 2017. "Premium levels and demand response in health insurance: relative thinking and zero-price effects," CPB Discussion Paper 366, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    4. Breyer Friedrich, 2018. "Was spricht gegen Zwei-Klassen-Medizin?," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 67(1), pages 30-41, May.
    5. Stefan Pichler & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2015. "The Pros and Cons of Sick Pay Schemes: Testing for Contagious Presenteeism and Shirking Behavior," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1509, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Gartner, Daniel & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "Scheduling the hospital-wide flow of elective patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 689-699.
    7. Drake, Coleman, 2019. "What are consumers willing to pay for a broad network health plan?: Evidence from covered California," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 63-77.
    8. Kurt Lavetti & Thomas DeLeire & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2023. "How do low‐income enrollees in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces respond to cost‐sharing?," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(1), pages 155-183, March.
    9. Pilny, Adam & Wübker, Ansgar & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2017. "Introducing risk adjustment and free health plan choice in employer-based health insurance: Evidence from Germany," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 330-351.
    10. Mathauer, Inke & Nicolle, Emmanuelle, 2011. "A global overview of health insurance administrative costs: what are the reasons for variations found?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 235-246.
    11. Juan Pablo Atal & Hanming Fang & Martin Karlsson & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2020. "Long-Term Health Insurance: Theory Meets Evidence," PIER Working Paper Archive 20-009, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    12. Weinhold, Ines & Wende, Danny & Schrey, Christopher & Militzer-Horstmann, Carsta & Schang, Laura & Sundmacher, Leonie, 2022. "Assessing patients’ acceptable and realised distances to determine accessibility standards for the size of catchment areas in outpatient care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(11), pages 1180-1186.
    13. Martelli, Nicolas & van den Brink, Hélène, 2014. "Special funding schemes for innovative medical devices in French hospitals: The pros and cons of two different approaches," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 1-5.
    14. Kettlewell, Nathan & Zhang, Yuting, 2024. "Financial incentives and private health insurance demand on the extensive and intensive margins," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. Carla Collicelli, 2013. "Subjective Indicators in the Health Sector and Their Usefulness in Policy Making," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 87-103, October.
    16. Pichler, Stefan & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2017. "The pros and cons of sick pay schemes: Testing for contagious presenteeism and noncontagious absenteeism behavior," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 14-33.
    17. Sundmacher, Leonie, 2013. "Trends and levels of avoidable mortality among districts: “Healthy” benchmarking in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 281-289.
    18. Alexander Karmann & Felix Roesel, 2017. "Hospital Policy and Productivity – Evidence from German States," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(12), pages 1548-1565, December.
    19. Hayen, Arthur P. & Klein, Tobias J. & Salm, Martin, 2021. "Does the framing of patient cost-sharing incentives matter? the effects of deductibles vs. no-claim refunds," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Schang, Laura & Morton, Alec & DaSilva, Philip & Bevan, Gwyn, 2014. "From data to decisions? Exploring how healthcare payers respond to the NHS Atlas of Variation in Healthcare in England," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 79-87.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:14:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s40258-016-0223-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.