IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/anresc/v73y2024i3d10.1007_s00168-023-01252-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Jurisdictional homogeneity and coterminous local government borders: a comparison of counties in New Jersey and New York State

Author

Listed:
  • Lee Hachadoorian

    (Temple University)

Abstract

Tiebout (J Polit Econ 64:416–424, 1956) argues that local public goods will be provided efficiently if households vote with their feet to move to the jurisdiction that best matches their preferences. This outcome may be impeded by overlapping jurisdictions of municipalities, school districts, and police agencies. To investigate the impact of coterminous borders on Tiebout sorting, two counties with similar demographics are chosen within the New York City metropolitan area. Differing histories lead to municipalities in Bergen County, NJ, always being coterminous with elementary school districts and police agencies, while few municipalities in Nassau County, NY, have their own police agencies and even fewer have their own school districts. Heterogeneity of sociodemographics and service quality are calculated between neighboring Census block groups, and absolute difference in median household income is regressed on these measures and interactions between the three kinds of service area borders. School district and police agency borders and quality are found to not be individually significant (with one minor exception). Police agency borders interacted with municipal borders increase income sorting, while school district borders interacted with police agency borders decrease income sorting. Income differences are also correlated with differences in the proportion of White and Black population in neighboring block groups, supporting previous findings that Tiebout sorting may exacerbate segregation. Municipal borders are an independently significant influence on income sorting across all specifications, indicating the important and independent role of local public goods other than education and public safety in residential location.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee Hachadoorian, 2024. "Jurisdictional homogeneity and coterminous local government borders: a comparison of counties in New Jersey and New York State," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(3), pages 1045-1067, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:73:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s00168-023-01252-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s00168-023-01252-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00168-023-01252-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00168-023-01252-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hilber, Christian A.L. & Mayer, Christopher, 2009. "Why do households without children support local public schools? Linking house price capitalization to school spending," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 74-90, January.
    2. Eberts, Randall W. & Gronberg, Timothy J., 1981. "Jurisdictional homogeneity and the Tiebout hypothesis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 227-239, September.
    3. Hill, Richard Child, 1974. "Separate and Unequal: Governmental Inequality in the Metropolis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(4), pages 1557-1568, December.
    4. Charles M. Tiebout, 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(5), pages 416-416.
    5. Ostrom, Vincent & Tiebout, Charles M. & Warren, Robert, 1961. "The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(4), pages 831-842, December.
    6. HyungGun Park, 2021. "Income sorting by specialized services: Service differentiation by overlapping governments," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2761-2775, November.
    7. Teske, Paul & Schneider, Mark & Mintrom, Michael & Best, Samuel, 1993. "Establishing The Micro Foundations of a Macro Theory: Information, Movers, and the Competitive Local Market for Public Goods," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(3), pages 702-713, September.
    8. Vincent Munley, 1982. "An alternate test of the Tiebout hypothesis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 211-217, January.
    9. Dawkins, Casey J., 2005. "Tiebout choice and residential segregation by race in US metropolitan areas, 1980-2000," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 734-755, November.
    10. Heikkila, Eric J., 1996. "Are municipalities Tieboutian clubs?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 203-226, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Boettke & Christopher Coyne & Peter Leeson, 2011. "Quasimarket failure," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 209-224, October.
    2. Lee Hachadoorian, 2016. "Homogeneity tests of Tiebout sorting: A case study at the interface of city and suburb," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(5), pages 1000-1021, April.
    3. Eric J. Heikkila & Jordy Coutin, 2024. "Tieboutian clubs revisited," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(3), pages 1097-1123, October.
    4. Matthew Lee Howell, 2014. "The Logic of Urban Fragmentation: Organisational Ecology and the Proliferation of American Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(5), pages 899-916, April.
    5. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Bruce A. Seaman, 1985. "Private Schooling and the Tiebout Hypothesis," Public Finance Review, , vol. 13(3), pages 293-318, July.
    6. Shawna Grosskopf & Kathy J. Hayes & Lori L. Taylor & William Weber, 1995. "On competition and school efficiency," Working Papers 9506, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
    7. David Lowery, 2013. "Remembering Vincent Ostrom: unhorsing a dominant paradigm," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 163-171, March.
    8. Hilber, Christian A.L., 2010. "New housing supply and the dilution of social capital," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 419-437, May.
    9. Deller, Steven C. & Hinds, David G. & Hinman, Donald L., 2001. "Local Public Services In Wisconsin: Alternatives For Municipalities With A Focus On Privatization," Staff Papers 12658, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    10. Christian A. L. Hilber, 2017. "The Economic Implications of House Price Capitalization: A Synthesis," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 45(2), pages 301-339, April.
    11. Tavares Antonio F., 2018. "Municipal amalgamations and their effects: a literature review," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 5-15, March.
    12. Gaigné, Carl & Riou, Stéphane & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2016. "How to make the metropolitan area work? Neither big government, nor laissez-faire," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 100-113.
    13. Peter J. Boettke & Liya Palagashvili, 2015. "Taming Leviathan," Supreme Court Economic Review, University of Chicago Press, vol. 23(1), pages 279-303.
    14. Mark Koyama, 2012. "Prosecution Associations in Industrial Revolution England: Private Providers of Public Goods?," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(1), pages 95-130.
    15. Dawkins, Casey J., 2005. "Tiebout choice and residential segregation by race in US metropolitan areas, 1980-2000," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 734-755, November.
    16. repec:wly:soecon:v:80:4:y:2014:p:926-937 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Jaewoo Cho & Jae Hong Kim & Yonsu Kim, 2019. "Metropolitan governance structure and growth–inequality dynamics in the United States," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 598-616, May.
    18. Lars-Erik Borge & Jan K. Brueckner & Jorn Rattso, 2012. "Partial Fiscal Decentralization and Public-Sector Heterogeneity: Theory and Evidence from Norway," CESifo Working Paper Series 3954, CESifo.
    19. Scott L. Minkoff, 2009. "Minding Your Neighborhood: The Spatial Context of Local Redistribution," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(3), pages 516-537, September.
    20. John William Hatfield & Katrina Kosec & Luke P. Rodgers, 2024. "Housing values and jurisdictional fragmentation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 83-122, October.
    21. Jiang, Boqian, 2018. "Homeownership and voter turnout in u.s. local elections," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 168-183.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    R21; R23; H41; H71; H73;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R21 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Housing Demand
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • H73 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:73:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s00168-023-01252-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.