IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v68y1974i04p1557-1568_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Separate and Unequal: Governmental Inequality in the Metropolis

Author

Listed:
  • Hill, Richard Child

Abstract

The political incorporation and municipal segregation of classes and status groups in the metropolis tend to divorce fiscal resources from public needs and to create and perpetuate inequality among urban residents in the United States. An investigation of data collected for a large number of metropolitan areas in 1960 reveals a number of variables associated with inequality in the distribution of fiscal resources among municipalities in metropolitan areas. The level of income inequality among municipal governments in metropolitan areas varies directly with: location in the South; age, size and density of the metropolis; nonwhite concentration; family income inequality; residential segregation among social classes; housing segregation by quality; and governmental fragmentation. The data provide support for the argument that governmental inequality occupies a central position in the urban stratification system.

Suggested Citation

  • Hill, Richard Child, 1974. "Separate and Unequal: Governmental Inequality in the Metropolis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(4), pages 1557-1568, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:68:y:1974:i:04:p:1557-1568_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400104009/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Sadler & Dayne Walling & Zac Buchalski & Alan Harris, 2020. "Are Metropolitan Areas Primed for Success? A Prosperity Risk Index for Evaluating Economic Development Patterns," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 323-337.
    2. David Lowery, 2013. "Remembering Vincent Ostrom: unhorsing a dominant paradigm," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 163-171, March.
    3. Juan C. Duque & Nancy Lozano‐Gracia & Jorge E. Patino & Paula Restrepo Cadavid, 2021. "Institutional fragmentation and metropolitan coordination in Latin American cities: Are there links with city productivity?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 1096-1128, August.
    4. Richard Sadler & Dayne Walling & Zac Buchalski & Alan Harris, 2020. "Are Metropolitan Areas Primed for Success? A Prosperity Risk Index for Evaluating Economic Development Patterns," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 323-337.
    5. Jaewoo Cho & Jae Hong Kim & Yonsu Kim, 2019. "Metropolitan governance structure and growth–inequality dynamics in the United States," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 598-616, May.
    6. Lee Hachadoorian, 2024. "Jurisdictional homogeneity and coterminous local government borders: a comparison of counties in New Jersey and New York State," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(3), pages 1045-1067, October.
    7. Peter Boettke & Christopher Coyne & Peter Leeson, 2011. "Quasimarket failure," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 209-224, October.
    8. A.J. Jacobs, 2003. "Embedded Autonomy and Uneven Metropolitan Development: A Comparison of the Detroit and Nagoya Auto Regions, 1969-2000," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(2), pages 335-360, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:68:y:1974:i:04:p:1557-1568_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.