IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/anresc/v50y2013i3p935-951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A nonsurvey multiregional input–output estimation allowing cross-hauling: partitioning two regions into three or more parts

Author

Listed:
  • Satoshi Nakano
  • Kazuhiko Nishimura

Abstract

This paper describes a nonsurvey method for estimating multiregional trades without eliminating cross-hauling, when a national biregional input–output table is available. Domestic outflows are assigned by interpolating the biregional trades on the basis of the gravity ratio between the origin and the destinations, with parameters estimated from an earlier survey on interregional transactions. The method is then applied to evaluate multiregional industrial waste disposal and landfill attributed to consumption in the city of Nagoya. Three-regional input–output tables with and without cross-hauling are estimated by partitioning the biregional table between Aichi prefecture and the rest of Japan. Copyright The Author(s) 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Satoshi Nakano & Kazuhiko Nishimura, 2013. "A nonsurvey multiregional input–output estimation allowing cross-hauling: partitioning two regions into three or more parts," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 50(3), pages 935-951, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:50:y:2013:i:3:p:935-951
    DOI: 10.1007/s00168-012-0521-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00168-012-0521-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00168-012-0521-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Lahr & Louis de Mesnard, 2004. "Biproportional Techniques in Input-Output Analysis: Table Updating and Structural Analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 115-134.
    2. Anthony Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2011. "Regional Input-Output Tables and the FLQ Formula: A Case Study of Finland," ERSA conference papers ersa11p334, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Roberta Capello & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), 2009. "Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12874.
    4. Tobias Kronenberg, 2009. "Construction of Regional Input-Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 32(1), pages 40-64, January.
    5. Karen R. Polenske & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, 2004. "Trade and spatial economic interdependence," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Raymond J. G. M. Florax & David A. Plane (ed.), Fifty Years of Regional Science, pages 269-289, Springer.
    6. Matthias Ruth & Brynhildur Davidsdottir (ed.), 2009. "The Dynamics of Regions and Networks in Industrial Ecosystems," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13019.
    7. Polenske, Karen R., 1995. "Leontief's spatial economic analyses," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 309-318, August.
    8. A. T. Flegg & C. D. Webber, 2000. "Regional Size, Regional Specialization and the FLQ Formula," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 563-569.
    9. Allan L. Olson, 1972. "A Method For Estimating Regional Redistributions Of Economic Activity," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 181-189, January.
    10. Patrick Canning & Zhi Wang, 2005. "A Flexible Mathematical Programming Model to Estimate Interregional Input–Output Accounts," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 539-563, August.
    11. Geoff Riddington & Hervey Gibson & John Anderson, 2006. "Comparison of Gravity Model, Survey and Location Quotient-based Local Area Tables and Multipliers," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9), pages 1069-1081.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chris Bachmann & Chris Kennedy & Matthew Roorda, 2015. "Estimating regional trade flows using commercial vehicle survey data," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 855-876, May.
    2. Hiramatsu, Tomoru & Inoue, Hiroki & Kato, Yasuhiko, 2016. "Estimation of interregional input–output table using hybrid algorithm of the RAS method and real-coded genetic algorithm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 385-402.
    3. Mitsuo Yamada, 2015. "Construction of a multi-regional input-output table for Nagoya metropolitan area, Japan," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristinn Hermannsson, 2016. "Beyond Intermediates: The Role of Consumption and Commuting in the Construction of Local Input–Output Tables," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 315-339, July.
    2. Anthony T. Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2011. "A comment on Tobias Kronenberg's "Construction of regional input-output tables using nonsurvey methods: the role of cross-hauling"," Working Papers 20111111, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    3. Szabó, Norbert, 2015. "Methods for regionalizing input-output tables," MPRA Paper 73947, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Gunnar Lindberg, 2011. "On the appropriate use of (input-output) coefficients to generate non-survey regional input-output tables: Implications for the determination of output multipliers," ERSA conference papers ersa10p800, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Tobias Kronenberg, 2012. "Regional input-output models and the treatment of imports in the European System of Accounts (ESA)," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 32(2), pages 175-191, September.
    6. Michael L. Lahr & João Pedro Ferreira & Johannes R. Többen, 2020. "Intraregional trade shares for goods‐producing industries: RPC estimates using EU data," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(6), pages 1583-1605, December.
    7. Ageliki Anagnostou & Pawel Gajewski, 2021. "Multi-Regional Input–Output Tables for Macroeconomic Simulations in Poland’s Regions," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Anthony T. Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2013. "A Comment on Tobias Kronenberg’s “Construction of Regional Input-Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods: The Role of Cross-Haulingâ€," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 36(2), pages 235-257, April.
    9. Kronenberg, Tobias & Többen, Johannes, 2011. "Regional input-output modelling in Germany: The case of North Rhine-Westphalia," MPRA Paper 35494, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Lankhuizen, Maureen & Boonstra, Harm Jan & de Blois, Chris, 2020. "Unpacking freight – Identifying conditions driving regional freight transport in statistics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 415-435.
    11. Mattia Cai, 2021. "Doubly constrained gravity models for interregional trade estimation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(2), pages 455-474, April.
    12. Kowalewski, Julia, 2012. "Regionalization of national input-output tables: Empirical evidence on the use of the FLQ formula," HWWI Research Papers 126, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    13. Anthony T. Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2013. "Estimating regional input coefficients and multipliers: The Use of the FLQ is not a Gamble," Working Papers 20131302, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    14. Anthony Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2011. "Regional Input-Output Tables and the FLQ Formula: A Case Study of Finland," ERSA conference papers ersa11p334, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Jahn, Malte, 2015. "A location quotient-based interregional input-output (IRIOLQ) framework," HWWI Research Papers 161, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    16. Kowalewski, Julia, 2012. "Inter-industrial relations and sectoral employment development in German regions," HWWI Research Papers 127, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    17. Anthony T. Flegg & Leonardo J. Mastronardi & Carlos A. Romero, 2014. "Empirical evidence on the use of the FLQ formula for regionalizing national input-output tables: The case of the Province of C¨®rdoba, Argentina," Working Papers 20141406, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    18. Johannes Többen & Tobias Heinrich Kronenberg, 2015. "Construction Of Multi-Regional Input--Output Tables Using The Charm Method," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 487-507, December.
    19. repec:elg:eechap:14395_9 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Anthony T Flegg & Yongming Huang & Timo Tohmo, 2013. "Cross-hauling and regional input-output tables: the case of the province of Hubei, China," Working Papers 20131310, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    21. Yicheol Han & Stephan J. Goetz & Claudia Schmidt, 2021. "Visualizing Spatial Economic Supply Chains to Enhance Sustainability and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    C67; D57; R15;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
    • D57 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Input-Output Tables and Analysis
    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:50:y:2013:i:3:p:935-951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.