IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jecstr/v4y2015i1p1-1810.1186-s40008-015-0022-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction of a multi-regional input-output table for Nagoya metropolitan area, Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Mitsuo Yamada

Abstract

Japan has many input-output tables, national and regional. We focus on the Nagoya metropolitan area, in which Toyota Motors is headquartered along with many industries manufacturing transport equipment, machine tools and other machinery. This area is included in the region covered by three prefectures; Aichi, Gifu, and Mie. To construct a multi-regional input-output table from these prefectures, we first break down each prefecture table with 186 sectors into several smaller sub-regional tables. Then we combine each table into one multi-regional input output table, consisting of 14 sub-regions. Transaction values among sub-regions of each sector are estimated by the gravity-RAS method, in which the initial values are obtained by the gravity model. Using the multi-regional table, we discuss the structural characteristics of the Nagoya metropolitan area. We then show a way to cope with the various inconsistencies of regional definitions, administrative and economic, in the input-output analysis. Copyright Yamada. 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Mitsuo Yamada, 2015. "Construction of a multi-regional input-output table for Nagoya metropolitan area, Japan," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jecstr:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:1-18:10.1186/s40008-015-0022-7
    DOI: 10.1186/s40008-015-0022-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1186/s40008-015-0022-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40008-015-0022-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tobias Kronenberg, 2009. "Construction of Regional Input-Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 32(1), pages 40-64, January.
    2. Ana L.M. Sargento & Pedro Nogueira Ramos & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, 2012. "Inter-Regional Trade Flow Estimation Through Non-Survey Models: An Empirical Assessment," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 173-193, March.
    3. Erik Dietzenbacher & Isidoro Romero, 2007. "Production Chains in an Interregional Framework: Identification by Means of Average Propagation Lengths," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 362-383, October.
    4. Satoshi Nakano & Kazuhiko Nishimura, 2013. "A nonsurvey multiregional input–output estimation allowing cross-hauling: partitioning two regions into three or more parts," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 50(3), pages 935-951, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sargento, Ana Lúcia Marto & Lahr, Michael L. & Ferreira, João Pedro & de la Torre Cuevas, Fernando, 2024. "Revisiting methods for estimating interregional input-output accounts: It's not just about trade flows," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 664-677.
    2. Gabela, Julio Gustavo Fournier, 2020. "On the accuracy of gravity-RAS approaches used for inter-regional trade estimation: evidence using the 2005 inter-regional input–output table of Japan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 521-539.
    3. Glyn Wittwer & Mark Horridge, 2018. "Prefectural Representation of the Regions of China in a Bottom-up CGE Model: SinoTERM365," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 3(2), pages 178-213, December.
    4. Balster, Andreas & Friedrich, Hanno, 2019. "Dynamic freight flow modelling for risk evaluation in food supply," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 4-22.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael L. Lahr & João Pedro Ferreira & Johannes R. Többen, 2020. "Intraregional trade shares for goods‐producing industries: RPC estimates using EU data," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(6), pages 1583-1605, December.
    2. Ageliki Anagnostou & Pawel Gajewski, 2021. "Multi-Regional Input–Output Tables for Macroeconomic Simulations in Poland’s Regions," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Chris Bachmann & Chris Kennedy & Matthew Roorda, 2015. "Estimating regional trade flows using commercial vehicle survey data," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 855-876, May.
    4. Mattia Cai, 2021. "Doubly constrained gravity models for interregional trade estimation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(2), pages 455-474, April.
    5. Los, Bart & Timmer, Marcel & Vries, Gaaitzen J. de, 2013. "Made in Europe? Trends in International Production Fragmentation," GGDC Research Memorandum GD-131, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
    6. De Backer, Koen & Miroudot, Sébastien, 2014. "Mapping global value chains," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 37176, May.
    7. Tranos, Emmanouil & Incera, Andre Carrascal & Willis, George, 2022. "Using the web to predict regional trade flows: data extraction, modelling, and validation," OSF Preprints 9bu5z, Center for Open Science.
    8. Bernhard Michel & Caroline Hambÿe & Bart Hertveldt, 2018. "The Role of Exporters and Domestic Producers in GVCs: Evidence for Belgium based on Extended National Supply-and-Use Tables Integrated into a Global Multiregional Input-Output Table," NBER Working Papers 25155, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Liis LILL, 2008. "Assessing Economic Complexity in some OECD countries with Input-Output Based Measures," EcoMod2008 23800082, EcoMod.
    10. Jiansuo Pei & Jan Oosterhaven & Erik Dietzenbacher, 2017. "Foreign exports, net interregional spillovers and Chinese regional supply chains," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(2), pages 281-298, June.
    11. Andre Fernandes Tomon Avelino, 2017. "Disaggregating input–output tables in time: the temporal input–output framework," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 313-334, July.
    12. Gunnar Lindberg, 2011. "On the appropriate use of (input-output) coefficients to generate non-survey regional input-output tables: Implications for the determination of output multipliers," ERSA conference papers ersa10p800, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Tobias Kronenberg, 2012. "Regional input-output models and the treatment of imports in the European System of Accounts (ESA)," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 32(2), pages 175-191, September.
    14. Zhang, Zengkai & Zhang, ZhongXiang & Zhu, Kunfu, 2020. "Allocating carbon responsibility: The role of spatial production fragmentation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Mark Thissen & Maureen Lankhuizen & Frank (F.G.) van Oort & Bart Los & Dario Diodato, 2018. "EUREGIO: The construction of a global IO DATABASE with regional detail for Europe for 2000-2010," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 18-084/VI, Tinbergen Institute.
    16. GARCIA-MUÑIZ, Ana Salome, 2013. "Modelling Linkages Versus Leakages Networks: The Case Of Spain," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 13(1), pages 43-54.
    17. Arne Geschke & Richard Wood & Keiichiro Kanemoto & Manfred Lenzen & Daniel Moran, 2014. "Investigating Alternative Approaches To Harmonise Multi-Regional Input-Output Data," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 354-385, September.
    18. Meiling Li & Lijie Zhang & Zhuangzhuang Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Digital Economy on Inter-Regional Trade: An Empirical Analysis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    19. García-Muñiz, Ana Salomé & Vicente, María Rosalía, 2014. "ICT technologies in Europe: A study of technological diffusion and economic growth under network theory," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 360-370.
    20. Jaime Flórez Bolanos, 2020. "Los efectos tributarios en los sectores de la economía colombiana," Apuntes del Cenes, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, vol. 39(70), pages 141-166, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Multi-regional input-output table; Gravity-RAS method; Average Propagation Lengths; Nagoya metropolitan area; Crosshauling; R15; R12;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jecstr:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:1-18:10.1186/s40008-015-0022-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.