IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v342y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-023-05680-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated group fuzzy inference and best–worst method for supplier selection in intelligent circular supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Madjid Tavana

    (La Salle University
    University of Paderborn)

  • Shahryar Sorooshian

    (University of Gothenburg)

  • Hassan Mina

    (Saito University College)

Abstract

Circular supplier evaluation aims at selecting the most suitable suppliers with zero waste. Sustainable circular supplier selection also considers socio-economic and environmental factors in the decision process. This study proposes an integrated method for evaluating sustainable suppliers in intelligent circular supply chains using fuzzy inference and multi-criteria decision-making. In the first stage of the proposed method, supplier evaluation sub-criteria are identified and weighted from economic, social, circular, and Industry 4.0 perspectives using a fuzzy group best–worst method followed by scoring the suppliers on each criterion. In the second stage, the suppliers are ranked and selected according to an overall score determined by a fuzzy inference system. Finally, the applicability of the proposed method is demonstrated using data from a public–private partnership project at an offshore wind farm in Southeast Asia.

Suggested Citation

  • Madjid Tavana & Shahryar Sorooshian & Hassan Mina, 2024. "An integrated group fuzzy inference and best–worst method for supplier selection in intelligent circular supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 803-844, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:342:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05680-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05680-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05680-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-023-05680-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:342:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05680-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.