IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p3795-d777843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Model Based on Extended VIKOR and MARCOS for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Organ Transplantation Networks for Healthcare Devices

Author

Listed:
  • Sina Salimian

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran 3319118651, Iran)

  • Seyed Meysam Mousavi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran 3319118651, Iran)

  • Jurgita Antucheviciene

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

The selection of proper healthcare device suppliers in sustainable organ transplantation networks has become an essential topic of increasing life expectancy. Assessment of sustainable healthcare device suppliers can be regarded as a complex multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem that consists of multiple alternative solutions with sustainable criteria. For this reason, this paper proposes a new integrated MCDM model based on combining an extended vlsekriterijuska optimizacija i komoromisno resenje (E-VIKOR) and measurement alternatives and ranking according to the compromise solution (MARCOS) approaches under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs). The aggregating technique of the E-VIKOR method is a strong point of this method compared to the original approach. The IVIFS is taken to cope with the uncertain situation of real-world applications. In this regard, an IVIF-similarity measure is introduced to compute weights of the decision-makers (DMs). The IVIF-Shannon entropy method is utilized to calculate the criteria weights, and a new hybrid proposed model is developed by presenting the IVIF-E-VIKOR method and IVIF-MARCOS, to calculate the ranking of sustainable supplier alternatives in organ transplantation networks to supply the surgery devices. Afterward, an illustrative example is introduced to evaluate the performance of the proposed model, and a comparative analysis is presented to confirm and validate the proposed approach. Moreover, sensitivity analysis for essential parameters of the proposed model is performed to assess their effects on outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sina Salimian & Seyed Meysam Mousavi & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2022. "An Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Model Based on Extended VIKOR and MARCOS for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Organ Transplantation Networks for Healthcare Devices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3795-:d:777843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3795/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3795/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ren-Jie Mao & Jian-Xin You & Chun-Yan Duan & Lu-Ning Shao, 2019. "A Heterogeneous MCDM Framework for Sustainable Supplier Evaluation and Selection Based on the IVIF-TODIM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jonas Šaparauskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2018. "Sustainability in Construction Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-7, June.
    3. Zahiri, B. & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. & Mohammadi, M. & Jula, P., 2014. "Multi-objective design of an organ transplant network under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 101-124.
    4. Tuncdan Baltacioglu & Erhan Ada & Melike D. Kaplan & Oznur Yurt And & Y. Cem Kaplan, 2007. "A New Framework for Service Supply Chains," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 105-124, March.
    5. Miomir Stanković & Željko Stević & Dillip Kumar Das & Marko Subotić & Dragan Pamučar, 2020. "A New Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Road Traffic Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, March.
    6. R. Rajaram & B. Castellani & A. N. Wilson, 2017. "Advancing Shannon Entropy for Measuring Diversity in Systems," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-10, May.
    7. Jiang, Wen-Hui & Xu, Ling & Chen, Zhen-Song & Govindan, Kannan & Chin, Kwai-Sang, 2022. "Financing equilibrium in a capital constrained supply Chain: The impact of credit rating," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Wenhao Qi & Zhixiong Huang & Hasan Dinçer & Renata Korsakienė & Serhat Yüksel, 2020. "Corporate Governance-Based Strategic Approach to Sustainability in Energy Industry of Emerging Economies with a Novel Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Hybrid Decision Making Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Frank Krysiak, 2009. "Risk Management as a Tool for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 483-492, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anastasios Sepetis & Paraskevi N. Zaza & Fotios Rizos & Pantelis G. Bagos, 2022. "Identifying and Predicting Healthcare Waste Management Costs for an Optimal Sustainable Management System: Evidence from the Greek Public Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Benedictus Rahardjo & Fu-Kwun Wang & Shih-Che Lo & Jia-Hong Chou, 2023. "A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model Combining DANP with VIKOR for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Electronics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Santonab Chakraborty & Rakesh D. Raut & T. M. Rofin & Shankar Chakraborty, 2024. "On solving a healthcare supplier selection problem using MCDM methods in intuitionistic fuzzy environment," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(2), pages 680-708, June.
    5. Madjid Tavana & Shahryar Sorooshian & Hassan Mina, 2024. "An integrated group fuzzy inference and best–worst method for supplier selection in intelligent circular supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 803-844, November.
    6. Minh-Tai Le & Nhat-Luong Nhieu & Thuy-Duong Thi Pham, 2022. "Direct-Use Geothermal Energy Location Multi-Criteria Planning for On-Site Energy Security in Emergencies: A Case Study of Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melda Kokoç & Süleyman Ersöz, 2021. "A literature review of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodologies," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(4), pages 89-116.
    2. Emilia Vann Yaroson & Soumyadeb Chowdhury & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Prasanta Kumar Dey, 2024. "Unearthing the interplay between organisational resources, knowledge and industry 4.0 analytical decision support tools to achieve sustainability and supply chain wellbeing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1321-1368, November.
    3. Yang, Yang & Liu, Jie & Hu, Taizhong, 2023. "Capital allocation and pricing decisions under trade credit with time-sensitive stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Chia-Nan Wang & Yu-Chi Chung & Fajar Dwi Wibowo & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen, 2023. "Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery Solution Evaluation in the Context of a Developing Country: A Novel OPA–Fuzzy MARCOS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Fernando Rojas & Peter Wanke & Víctor Leiva & Mauricio Huerta & Carlos Martin-Barreiro, 2022. "Modeling Inventory Cost Savings and Supply Chain Success Factors: A Hybrid Robust Compromise Multi-Criteria Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Haiyang Shang & Fang Su & Serhat Yüksel & Hasan Dinçer, 2021. "Identifying the Strategic Priorities of the Technical Factors for the Sustainable Low Carbon Industry Based on Macroeconomic Conditions," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    8. Alma Sheko & Alma Braimllari (Spaho), 2018. "Information Technology Inhibitors and Information Quality in Supply Chain Management: A PLS-SEM Analysis," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 7, November.
    9. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Dragan Pamucar & Abhijit Saha, 2024. "An integrated Pythagorean fuzzy fairly operator-based MARCOS method for solving the sustainable circular supplier selection problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 523-564, November.
    10. Maryam Hussain Abal-Seqan & Shaligram Pokharel & Khalid Kamal Naji, 2023. "Key Success Factors and Their Impact on the Performance of Construction Projects: Case in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Johnson, Mark & Mena, Carlos, 2008. "Supply chain management for servitised products: A multi-industry case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 27-39, July.
    12. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Thanh, Vo-Van, 2019. "A multi-objective mixed robust possibilistic flexible programming approach for sustainable seaport-dry port network design under an uncertain environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 13-39.
    13. Chia-Nan Wang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thanh-Tuan Dang, 2023. "Sustainable Evaluation of Major Third-Party Logistics Providers: A Framework of an MCDM-Based Entropy Objective Weighting Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, October.
    14. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Thanh, Vo-Van, 2021. "Toward sustainable microgrids with blockchain technology-based peer-to-peer energy trading mechanism: A fuzzy meta-heuristic approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. Shi, Yan & Zhang, Zhiyong & Tiwari, Sunil & Yang, Lei, 2023. "Pricing and replenishment strategy for a perishable product under various payment schemes and cap-and-trade regulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    16. Shabnam Rekabi & Ali Ghodratnama & Amir Azaron, 2022. "Designing pharmaceutical supply chain networks with perishable items considering congestion," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 4159-4219, September.
    17. Anas A. Makki & Reda M. S. Abdulaal, 2023. "A Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on Fuzzy MEREC-G and Fuzzy RATMI," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Akkermans, H.A. & Voss, C., 2013. "The service bullwhip effect," Other publications TiSEM 94cf4db3-1de0-4b53-897b-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Saba Pourreza & Misagh Faezipour & Miad Faezipour, 2022. "Eye-SCOR: A Supply Chain Operations Reference-Based Framework for Smart Eye Status Monitoring Using System Dynamics Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Zhalechian, M. & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. & Zahiri, B. & Mohammadi, M., 2016. "Sustainable design of a closed-loop location-routing-inventory supply chain network under mixed uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 182-214.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3795-:d:777843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.