IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v340y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-022-05100-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the system resilience of project portfolio network considering risk propagation

Author

Listed:
  • Xingqi Zou

    (Kunming University of Science and Technology)

  • Qing Yang

    (University of Science and Technology Beijing)

  • Qinru Wang

    (University of Science and Technology Beijing)

  • Bin Jiang

    (DePaul University)

Abstract

The paper presents the model resilience measurement based on the complex network theory and analyzes the resilience of project portfolio network considering risk propagation. The model can be used to evaluate the resilience and improve its success probability of projects in the portfolio network. Firstly, the research analyzes the dynamic changes of the portfolio network derived from the construction of the project portfolio matrix, as well as the main factors to be taken into consideration in measuring the resilience of the project portfolio. Further, the research measures the resilience of the project portfolio network according to the node attributes (project) and the relationship attributes (the relationship that one project will impact another in the portfolio network) respectively. Then, to integrate the resilience of the projects and influence relationship between projects, the research proposes the dynamic PageRank algorithm to analyze the resilience of the project portfolio based on the analysis of traditional PageRank algorithm. In addition, resilience is not only affected by the projects and its influence relationship between them, but is also affected by risk propagation. Therefore, the research presents a model for analyzing the portfolio network resilience considering multiple risk propagation. Finally, a research and development project portfolio are taken as an example to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method presented in this research. Our approach can be used by managers to identify the scores of project resilience capacity in portfolio network. Our method explicitly allows to uncover the most resilient projects considering the resilience of project (node) and their influence relationship (network structure), and the risk propagation. Utilizing the outcomes of this research can enhance the capacity of the whole project portfolio to manage risks and improve the success probability of the whole project portfolio by enhancing network resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingqi Zou & Qing Yang & Qinru Wang & Bin Jiang, 2024. "Measuring the system resilience of project portfolio network considering risk propagation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 693-721, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:340:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-05100-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-05100-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-05100-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-022-05100-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Foroogh Ghasemi & Mohammad Hossein Mahmoudi Sari & Vahidreza Yousefi & Reza Falsafi & Jolanta Tamošaitienė, 2018. "Project Portfolio Risk Identification and Analysis, Considering Project Risk Interactions and Using Bayesian Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Li, Yuhong & Zobel, Christopher W., 2020. "Exploring supply chain network resilience in the presence of the ripple effect," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Alexandre Dolgui & Dmitry Ivanov, 2021. "Ripple effect and supply chain disruption management: new trends and research directions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 102-109, January.
    4. Plaza, Malgorzata & Rohlf, Katrin, 2008. "Learning and performance in ERP implementation projects: A learning-curve model for analyzing and managing consulting costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 72-85, September.
    5. Ritesh Ojha & Abhijeet Ghadge & Manoj Kumar Tiwari & Umit S. Bititci, 2018. "Bayesian network modelling for supply chain risk propagation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(17), pages 5795-5819, September.
    6. Christopher N. Kaiser-Bunbury & James Mougal & Andrew E. Whittington & Terence Valentin & Ronny Gabriel & Jens M. Olesen & Nico Blüthgen, 2017. "Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function," Nature, Nature, vol. 542(7640), pages 223-227, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    2. Madhukar Chhimwal & Saurabh Agrawal & Girish Kumar, 2021. "Measuring Circular Supply Chain Risk: A Bayesian Network Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Vimal K.E.K & Simon Peter Nadeem & Mahadharsan Ravichandran & Manavalan Ethirajan & Jayakrishna Kandasamy, 2022. "Resilience strategies to recover from the cascading ripple effect in a copper supply chain through project management," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 440-460, June.
    4. Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2021. "OR-methods for coping with the ripple effect in supply chains during COVID-19 pandemic: Managerial insights and research implications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    5. Zhimei Lei & Li Cui & Jing Tang & Lujie Chen & Bingbing Liu, 2024. "Supply chain resilience in the context of I4.0 and I5.0 from a multilayer network ripple effect perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1149-1192, November.
    6. Niels Bugert & Rainer Lasch, 2023. "Analyzing upstream and downstream risk propagation in supply networks by combining Agent-based Modeling and Bayesian networks," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(5), pages 859-889, July.
    7. Alam, Md Fahim Bin & Tushar, Saifur Rahman & Ahmed, Tazim & Karmaker, Chitra Lekha & Bari, A.B.M. Mainul & de Jesus Pacheco, Diego Augusto & Nayyar, Anand & Islam, Abu Reza Md Towfiqul, 2024. "Analysis of the enablers to deal with the ripple effect in food grain supply chains under disruption: Implications for food security and sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    8. Liu, Ming & Lin, Tao & Chu, Feng & Ding, Yueyu & Zheng, Feifeng & Chu, Chengbin, 2023. "Bi-objective optimization for supply chain ripple effect management under disruption risks with supplier actions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    9. Yang, Qing & Zou, Xingqi & Ye, Yunting & Yao, Tao, 2022. "Evaluating the criticality of the product development project portfolio network from the perspective of risk propagation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 593(C).
    10. Sajid, Zaman, 2021. "A dynamic risk assessment model to assess the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) on the sustainability of the biomass supply chain: A case study of a U.S. biofuel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    11. Giovanna Culot & Matteo Podrecca & Guido Nassimbeni & Guido Orzes & Marco Sartor, 2023. "Using supply chain databases in academic research: A methodological critique," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(1), pages 3-25, January.
    12. Lin, Edward M.H. & Sun, Edward W. & Yu, Min-Teh, 2020. "Behavioral data-driven analysis with Bayesian method for risk management of financial services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Lin-Lin Wang & Zachary Y. Huang & Wen-Fei Dai & Yong-Ping Yang & Yuan-Wen Duan, 2024. "Mixed effects of honey bees on pollination function in the Tibetan alpine grasslands," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Yu Gong & Xiaojiang Xu & Changping Zhao & Tobias Schoenherr, 2024. "Multi-Tier Supply Chain Learning Networks: A Simulation Study Based on the Experience-Weighted Attraction (EWA) Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    15. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2022. "Stochastic optimization of supply chain resilience under ripple effect: A COVID-19 pandemic related study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    16. Clavijo-Buritica, Nicolás & Triana-Sanchez, Laura & Escobar, John Willmer, 2023. "A hybrid modeling approach for resilient agri-supply network design in emerging countries: Colombian coffee supply chain," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    17. Yijun Liu & Xiaokun Jin & Yunrui Zhang, 2024. "Identifying risks in temporal supernetworks: an IO-SuperPageRank algorithm," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Wei Xu & Dong-Ping Song, 2022. "Integrated optimisation for production capacity, raw material ordering and production planning under time and quantity uncertainties based on two case studies," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2343-2371, July.
    19. Liu, Ming & Ding, Yueyu & Chu, Feng & Dolgui, Alexandre & Zheng, Feifeng, 2024. "Robust actions for improving supply chain resilience and viability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    20. Li, Siyu & Huo, Baofeng & Han, Zhaojun, 2022. "A literature review towards theories and conceptual models of empirical studies on supply chain integration and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:340:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-05100-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.