IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v340y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-022-05084-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of change in environment on reliability growth modeling integrating fault reduction factor and change point: a general approach

Author

Listed:
  • Vikas Dhaka

    (University of Delhi)

  • Nidhi Nijhawan

    (University of Delhi)

Abstract

This paper presents a generalized software reliability modeling framework that predominantly encompasses randomness of field environment, fault reduction factor (FRF), and change point to study their simultaneous effect on software bug removal process. To address and capture unpredicted randomness of the field environment in testing phase it is assumed that the environment before and after a change point may not be the same and therefore there is a need to consider distinct environment factors before and after the change point in the modeling of bug removal action. Based on the general approach, three new change point-based software reliability growth models (SRGMs) are proposed incorporating time-dependent exponentiated Weibull (EW) FRF and distinct random environment distributions. To elaborate, in SRGM-I and SRGM-II, a steady environment is supposed before the change point whereas one-parameter exponential environment is assumed after the change point in SRGM-I and a two-parameter Gamma environment is considered after the change point in SRGM-II while in SRGM-III, exponential environment before change point and Gamma environment after change point are taken into consideration. In addition, a few established FRF-based models are deduced from the proposed general approach. Estimation of parameters of proposed SRGMs is carried out in two phases using three real test data sets and their validation is evaluated through several performance measures including coefficient of determination, mean square error, bias, variation, root mean square prediction error and Akaike information criteria. Fitting of the models to the datasets is also examined in related goodness of fit curves. Further, numerical illustration is worked out to conduct a cost-reliability assessment and suggest optimum release time.

Suggested Citation

  • Vikas Dhaka & Nidhi Nijhawan, 2024. "Effect of change in environment on reliability growth modeling integrating fault reduction factor and change point: a general approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 181-215, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:340:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-05084-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-05084-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-05084-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-022-05084-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madhu Jain & T. Manjula & T.R. Gulati, 2014. "Imperfect debugging study of SRGM with fault reduction factor and multiple change point," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 155-175.
    2. Yuka Minamino & Shinji Inoue & Shigeru Yamada, 2016. "NHPP-based change-point modeling for software reliability assessment and its application to software development management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(1), pages 85-101, September.
    3. Nidhi Nijhawan & Anu G. Aggarwal & Vikas Dhaka, 2018. "An SRGM for Multi-Release Open Source Software System," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Hoang Pham, 2006. "System Software Reliability," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-295-9, February.
    5. Mark A. Youngren, 1991. "Dependence in target element detections induced by the environment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(4), pages 567-577, August.
    6. P.K. Kapur & Hoang Pham & A. Gupta & P.C. Jha, 2011. "Software Reliability Assessment with OR Applications," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-0-85729-204-9, February.
    7. Babu Zachariah, 2015. "Optimal stopping time in software testing based on failure size approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 771-784, December.
    8. Subhashis Chatterjee & Shobhit Nigam & Jeetendra Bahadur Singh & Lakshmi Narayan Upadhyaya, 2012. "Effect of change point and imperfect debugging in software reliability and its optimal release policy," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 539-551, March.
    9. Tjur, Tue, 2009. "Coefficients of Determination in Logistic Regression Models—A New Proposal: The Coefficient of Discrimination," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 63(4), pages 366-372.
    10. Shinji Inoue & Jun Ikeda & Shigeru Yamada, 2016. "Bivariate change-point modeling for software reliability assessment with uncertainty of testing-environment factor," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(1), pages 209-220, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avinash K. Shrivastava & Vivek Kumar & P. K. Kapur & Ompal Singh, 2020. "Software release and testing stop time decision with change point," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(2), pages 196-207, July.
    2. Avinash K. Shrivastava & Vivek Kumar & P. K. Kapur & Ompal Singh, 0. "Software release and testing stop time decision with change point," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 0, pages 1-12.
    3. Subhashis Chatterjee & Ankur Shukla, 2017. "An Ideal Software Release Policy for an Improved Software Reliability Growth Model Incorporating Imperfect Debugging with Fault Removal Efficiency and Change Point," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(03), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Anshul Tickoo & P. K. Kapur & A. K. Shrivastava & Sunil K. Khatri, 2016. "Testing effort based modeling to determine optimal release and patching time of software," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 7(4), pages 427-434, December.
    5. Triet Pham & Hoang Pham, 2019. "A generalized software reliability model with stochastic fault-detection rate," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(1), pages 83-93, June.
    6. P. K. Kapur & Saurabh Panwar & Ompal Singh & Vivek Kumar, 2022. "Joint optimization of software time-to-market and testing duration using multi-attribute utility theory," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 305-332, May.
    7. Subhashis Chatterjee & Ankur Shukla & Hoang Pham, 2019. "Modeling and analysis of software fault detectability and removability with time variant fault exposure ratio, fault removal efficiency, and change point," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 246-256, April.
    8. Subhashis Chatterjee & Ankur Shukla, 2016. "Change point–based software reliability model under imperfect debugging with revised concept of fault dependency," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(6), pages 579-597, December.
    9. Da Hye Lee & In Hong Chang & Hoang Pham, 2020. "Software Reliability Model with Dependent Failures and SPRT," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Subhashis Chatterjee & Deepjyoti Saha & Akhilesh Sharma & Yogesh Verma, 2022. "Reliability and optimal release time analysis for multi up-gradation software with imperfect debugging and varied testing coverage under the effect of random field environments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 65-85, May.
    11. Mengmeng Zhu & Hoang Pham, 2022. "A generalized multiple environmental factors software reliability model with stochastic fault detection process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 525-546, April.
    12. Yoshinobu Tamura & Shoichiro Miyamoto & Lei Zhou & Adarsh Anand & P. K. Kapur & Shigeru Yamada, 2024. "OSS reliability assessment method based on deep learning and independent Wiener data preprocessing," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(6), pages 2668-2676, June.
    13. Ingo Geishecker & Philipp J. H. Schröder & Allan S⊘rensen, 2019. "One‐off export events," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 93-131, February.
    14. Daifeng Xiang & Gangsheng Wang & Jing Tian & Wanyu Li, 2023. "Global patterns and edaphic-climatic controls of soil carbon decomposition kinetics predicted from incubation experiments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Pellerey, Franco & Shaked, Moshe & Yasaei Sekeh, Salimeh, 2012. "Comparisons of concordance in additive models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(11), pages 2059-2067.
    16. Anu Aggarwal & Sudeep Kumar & Ritu Gupta, 2024. "Testing coverage based NHPP software reliability growth modeling with testing effort and change-point," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(11), pages 5157-5166, November.
    17. Liviu Adrian COTFAS & Andreea DIOSTEANU, 2010. "Software Reliability in Semantic Web Service Composition Applications," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(4), pages 48-56.
    18. Laurion, Henry, 2020. "Implications of Non-GAAP earnings for real activities and accounting choices," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1).
    19. Laura H. Antão & Benjamin Weigel & Giovanni Strona & Maria Hällfors & Elina Kaarlejärvi & Tad Dallas & Øystein H. Opedal & Janne Heliölä & Heikki Henttonen & Otso Huitu & Erkki Korpimäki & Mikko Kuuss, 2022. "Climate change reshuffles northern species within their niches," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(6), pages 587-592, June.
    20. Viral Gupta & P. K. Kapur & Deepak Kumar, 2019. "Prioritizing and Optimizing Disaster Recovery Solution using Analytic Network Process and Multi Attribute Utility Theory," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 171-207, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:340:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-05084-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.