IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v316y2022i1d10.1007_s10479-021-04040-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A remote sensing satellite observation scheme evaluation method based on granular computing of intuitionistic linguistic preference relation

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoxuan Hu

    (Hefei University of Technology
    Ministry of Education)

  • Yanjun Wang

    (Hefei University of Technology
    Ministry of Education)

  • Haiquan Sun

    (Hefei University of Technology
    Ministry of Education)

  • Peng Jin

    (Hefei University of Technology
    Ministry of Education)

Abstract

With the sustainable development of remote sensing satellite observation technology, the effectiveness of the remote sensing satellite observation scheme has drawn wide attention in recent years. A suitable evaluation model can provide a credible improvement basis and guide observation technology’s continuous development. In this study, we present an original method based on granular computing to evaluate the remote sensing satellite observation schemes by employing intuitionistic linguistic preference relation, which is ideal for allowing evaluation team members to depict their actual opinions. The granulation of the intuitionistic linguistic preference relation is regarded as an optimization problem, solved by using the particle swarm optimization. The optimization criterion comprised of consensus and consistency is maximized by a suitable mapping of the intuitionistic linguistic preference relation on information granules. Once the granulation of the intuitionistic linguistic preference relation is completed, the solution to the evaluation problem is constructed by the selection process in virtue of the dominance levels of observation schemes and the prioritization relationship of evaluation team members. Finally, an experimental example about the evaluation of remote sensing satellite observation schemes is reported to support the feasibility and practicality of the proposed evaluation method. Furthermore, comparative analysis with other methods is also analyzed to further demonstrate the performance of the designed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoxuan Hu & Yanjun Wang & Haiquan Sun & Peng Jin, 2022. "A remote sensing satellite observation scheme evaluation method based on granular computing of intuitionistic linguistic preference relation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 343-364, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:316:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04040-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04040-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04040-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-04040-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen Jiang & Boya Wei, 2018. "Intuitionistic fuzzy evidential power aggregation operator and its application in multiple criteria decision-making," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(3), pages 582-594, February.
    2. Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. & Chiclana, F. & Luque, M., 2004. "Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(1), pages 98-109, April.
    3. Cabrerizo, Francisco Javier & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique & Pedrycz, Witold, 2013. "A method based on PSO and granular computing of linguistic information to solve group decision making problems defined in heterogeneous contexts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 624-633.
    4. F. J. Cabrerizo & S. Alonso & E. Herrera-Viedma, 2009. "A Consensus Model For Group Decision Making Problems With Unbalanced Fuzzy Linguistic Information," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(01), pages 109-131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fu, Chao & Yang, Shanlin, 2012. "An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 167-176.
    2. Cabrerizo, Francisco Javier & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique & Pedrycz, Witold, 2013. "A method based on PSO and granular computing of linguistic information to solve group decision making problems defined in heterogeneous contexts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 624-633.
    3. Fu, Chao & Yang, Shan-Lin, 2010. "The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 601-608, November.
    4. Bice Cavallo, 2019. "Coherent weights for pairwise comparison matrices and a mixed-integer linear programming problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 143-161, September.
    5. Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Cheng-Wei Lin & Yi-Shih Chung, 2014. "Comparison analysis for subjective and objective weights of financial positions of container shipping companies," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 241-250, May.
    6. Llamazares, Bonifacio & Pérez-Asurmendi, Patrizia, 2013. "Triple-acyclicity in majorities based on difference in support," MPRA Paper 52218, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Zhou-Jing Wang & Yuhong Wang & Kevin W. Li, 2016. "An Acceptable Consistency-Based Framework for Group Decision Making with Intuitionistic Preference Relations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 181-202, January.
    8. Wu, Zhibin & Huang, Shuai & Xu, Jiuping, 2019. "Multi-stage optimization models for individual consistency and group consensus with preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 182-194.
    9. Zhang, Hengjie & Dong, Yucheng & Chiclana, Francisco & Yu, Shui, 2019. "Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 580-598.
    10. Xunjie Gou & Zeshui Xu & Xinxin Wang & Huchang Liao, 2021. "Managing consensus reaching process with self-confident double hierarchy linguistic preference relations in group decision making," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 51-79, March.
    11. Chia-Hua Cheng & James J. H. Liou & Chui-Yu Chiu, 2017. "A Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relations Based ANP Model for R&D Project Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Tlili, Ali & Belahcène, Khaled & Khaled, Oumaima & Mousseau, Vincent & Ouerdane, Wassila, 2022. "Learning non-compensatory sorting models using efficient SAT/MaxSAT formulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 979-1006.
    13. Liu Fang & Peng Yanan & Zhang Weiguo & Pedrycz Witold, 2017. "On Consistency in AHP and Fuzzy AHP," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 128-147, April.
    14. Tien-Chin Wang & Chia-Nan Wang & Xuan Huynh Nguyen, 2016. "Evaluating the Influence of Criteria to Attract Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) to Develop Supporting Industries in Vietnam by Utilizing Fuzzy Preference Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Nannan Wu & Yejun Xu & D. Marc Kilgour, 2019. "Water allocation analysis of the Zhanghe River basin using the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with incomplete fuzzy preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Peláez, José Ignacio & Bernal, Rubén, 2016. "Selective majority additive ordered weighting averaging operatorAuthor-Name: Karanik, Marcelo," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 816-826.
    17. Carmen De Maio & Aurelio Tommasetti & Orlando Troisi & Massimiliano Vesci & Giuseppe Fenza & Vincenzo Loia, 2016. "Contextual Fuzzy-Based Decision Support System Through Opinion Analysis: A Case Study at University of the Salerno," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(05), pages 923-948, September.
    18. Chiclana, F. & Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. & Alonso, S., 2007. "Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 383-399, October.
    19. Matheus Pereira Libório & Petr Yakovlevitch Ekel & Oseias da Silva Martinuci & Letícia Ribeiro Figueiredo & Renato Moreira Hadad & Renata de Mello Lyrio & Patrícia Bernardes, 2022. "Fuzzy set based intra-urban inequality indicator," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 667-687, April.
    20. Tien-Chin Wang & Hsiu-Chin Hsieh & Xuan-Huynh Nguyen & Chin-Ying Huang & Jen-Yao Lee, 2022. "Evaluating the Influence of Criteria Revitalization Strategy Implementation for the Hospitality Industry in the Post-Pandemic Era," World, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:316:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04040-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.